Afghan president: US ****** ****** 16 civilians

Premium Link Upgrade


KABUL, Afghanistan – President Hamid Karzai condemned a U.S. operation he said ****** 16 Afghan civilians, while hundreds of villagers denounced the American military during an angry demonstration Sunday.

Karzai said the ******* of innocent Afghans during U.S. military operations "is strengthening the terrorists."

He also announced that his Ministry of Defense sent Washington a draft technical agreement that seeks to give Afghanistan more oversight over U.S. military operations. The same letter has also been sent to NATO headquarters.

Karzai in recent weeks has increasingly lashed out at his Western backers over the issue of civilian casualties, even as U.S. politicians and a top NATO official have publicly criticized Karzai for the slow pace of progress here.

The back-and-forth comes as the new administration of President Barack Obama must decide whether to support Karzai as he seeks re-election later this year as part of the United States' overall Afghan strategy.

Karzai's latest criticism follows a Saturday raid in Laghman province that the U.S. says ****** 15 armed militants, including a woman with an RPG, but that Afghan officials say ****** civilians.

Two women and three ******** were among the 16 dead civilians, Karzai said in a statement."







Looks like the relationship between the originally american backed Karzai govt and the US govt is getting pretty strained.This policy is making us safer from more radicalization of the region and preventing future attacks against america?? Doesn't sound like it.
 
are you surprised to hear this? there was one a while ago where a U.S pilot accidentaly ****** a team of british soldiers because he didnt listen.
and when the u.s pilot accidentaly blew up the wrong village and ****** like, 60+ innocent villagers.
this **** always happens, and im not being nasty or anything, but how would "the best military on the planet" keep fucking up so much.
or is it just the pilots that are ****, because its always them
 
are you surprised to hear this? there was one a while ago where a U.S pilot accidentaly ****** a team of british soldiers because he didnt listen.

I'm pretty sure that it happened to the Canadians, not the British.
 
civilian casualties are mainly the result of accidents, faulty intelligence and simply people in the wrong place at the wrong time "collateral damage." As demonized as the American solider is, it is very rare that they maliciously and intentionally target non-combatants.

Most of the time they can't be blamed, and they don't even know that they are doing it. Of course you could argue that they knew what they were doing when they choose to join the military or accepted orders without question.

What it really boils down to the simple honest and ugly truth is that civilian casualties are an unavoidable part of warfare, and the people responsible know it. They choose to engage in warfare with the full knowledge that innocent people will die, and it is considered acceptable to them.
 
warfare, on the other hand, is often quite avoidable. unless your oil is starting to get expensive.
 
Back
Top