Abizaid: Mideast wars may last 50 years

We're still in Germany and Italy. I'm pretty sure it's that kind of "over-watch" role we'll be filling that far down the road... assuming the entire Middle East doesn't just start nuking eachother. My money is on Israel just getting sick of everyone messing with them and start launching missiles into every country that surrounds them.
 
My money is on Israel just getting sick of everyone messing with them and start launching missiles into every country that surrounds them.
No neg rep by me... :)

But can you name any incident when Israel has attacked pre-emptively / aggressively?

Yes, you can! Lebanon 2006. Forget about Olmert... :crash: There'll be more adept administrations ahead. :shock:


















Vote Likud in 2008! flylicker
 
What irks me is just how short-sighted the vision of our "Leaders" is. Devoting all those lives and so much money to maintain a controlling presence in a region that contains only enough oil to keep us going for - at our current and projected consumption rates - a few more decades. Not only is it selfish like a toddler who hasn't learned better (they have what we want, so we will use simple brute ***** to take it; although imagine the self-righteous moral rhetoric if another country that was capable actually invaded us to take something on/under our soil), it's also delusional and boneheaded beyond belief. Instead of emptying our coffers for those last few drops, why not devote that money to the development of some truly alternative energies/fuels?? We would also be tackling the global warming issue head on, instead of continuing to suck up a resource that the burning/consumption of which is endangering the future of the place we live. I think Dick Cheney & Co. just get such a hard-on when they think of their garages filled with SUVs, and the mighty gas-powered and oil-lubed engines that they love to rev up on their way to the golf course, that they just refuse to consider that such a lifestyle might EVER have to come to an end. As it is, we are driving ourselves, literally and figuratively, right into a corner. Some of us want to put the brakes on and turn around, but those in power just want to hit the gas and see what happens. Reckless, shameless.

You and AFA are making fantastically great points on this subject, fascinating discussion. F.K. your post appeals to the sensibilities that most of us humans possess: compassion, an open mind, and the ability to look beyond immediate self when evaluating a situation and developing a policy. The problem now is that those in the Bush administration lack any of those qualities. American politics, and this administration in particular, is dominated by Double High Authoritarian/Social Dominator personalities. These are power mad maniacs with no desire for equality and a complete lack of morality that are in charge of our country right now. These people lack any regard for anything but their immediate gratification. They are mental midgets, whose psychological make up allow them only to stomp whatever is in their way, viewing any dissenting opinion as a severe threat to their mere survival. They have no ability to debate and lack the behavioral maturity needed for intelligent discussion with anyone except those who blindly follow their orders.

These are the overwhelmingly prevalent personalities at work in our government today. The neocons are fully entrenched in our power seats and are destroying any international good will this once great country ever had. What else should we expect. All you have to do is go to a Walmart and see the swirling cess pool of idiots that make up this nation's electoral population.

"Conservatives Without Conscience" by John Dean is a great book that details the ascent of the ultra conservative right over the last 30 years. I'm halfway through reading. So far he has detailed the psychological make up of the various mad men in power today. Hopefully the second half of the book has some good ideas as to what we, as citizens, can do to reverse the horrifying trend that is currently taking place in our country.

I'll let you know.
 
Once the US goes someplace, they tend not to leave. This article claims the US has military bases in around 130 countries, but I've heard other numbers.
Premium Link Upgrade

Here's two gratuitous shots of beautiful Holly Morgan for Facial King, who was a bit upset my previous posting on this thread had no gratuitous naked chick. Sorry, won't happen again!

Premium Link Upgrade
Premium Link Upgrade

All better now?
 
Six Day War in 1967;
Premium Link Upgrade

1981: Israel bombs Baghdad nuclear reactor;
Premium Link Upgrade
Right!

Six Day War: An anticipated Yom Kippur scenario was thwarted.... The greatest military achievement in human history! :bowdown:

Osirak: Israel made Colin Powell's reasoning obsolete. Begin was 12 years ahead of Bush before Dubya even realized there was a place like Iraq. :confused:

Please don't call these actions pre-emptive / aggressive. Just because Israel managed to act five minutes before its Arab counterparts could destroy it, doesn't mean that it went to war preposterously.





... I would have forgiven you mentioning Lebanon '82 .... including Sabra, Shatila and all... :)
 
That's a subject I don't know enough about. I was just backing up your assertion that it happens. One of the recent films I watched warned about the danger of trusting and then allowing military strikes as preemptive and that is what the Bush administration had/is planning and outright suggesting in terms of both Iraq and Iran.
 
There is never going to be a peaceful middle east so whats the point in trying, and now that we've fucked it up even more ......
 
There is never going to be a peaceful middle east so whats the point in trying, and now that we've fucked it up even more ......

It's pretty clear that the reason to go in Iraq was to increase US power in the area, and that most of the money was spent as payback in sweetheart deals to corporations in the military business and friends of the administration. 9/11 was the catalyst for the urgent need to get going against a threat that simply wasn't there. Their planning was and is non existant. Anyone voicing opposition to the proposals is removed. It does however follow in the mold of Wolfowitz's own pre 9/11 beliefs about a New American Century in which the US played a more strategic and aggressive role in the region. A build up of military might to just bash and lie about goals and functions in the future.

Premium Link Upgrade
 
Of course it was to increase US power. And as the 'worlds policeman' were all going to be bowing to the US flag in 50 years
 
Of course it was to increase US power. And as the 'worlds policeman' were all going to be bowing to the US flag in 50 years


The candidate Mitt Romney has already made a strong pre election commitment to building a vastly bigger, better military, so how much bigger does it have to get with no real threat from the Russians anymore?
 
Once the US goes someplace, they tend not to leave. This article claims the US has military bases in around 130 countries, but I've heard other numbers.
Premium Link Upgrade

Here's two gratuitous shots of beautiful Holly Morgan for Facial King, who was a bit upset my previous posting on this thread had no gratuitous naked chick. Sorry, won't happen again!

Premium Link Upgrade
Premium Link Upgrade

All better now?

(oh, I'm all better now now, coors - thanks!)

:glugglug:

That's an interesting rundown of America's international military bases, too - I just saw Chalmers Johnson in one of those documentaries that AFA & I were talkin' about. Smart, interesting fellow!
 
That's an interesting rundown of America's international military bases, too - I just saw Chalmers Johnson in one of those documentaries that AFA & I were talkin' about. Smart, interesting fellow!

I'm going to get Sorrows of Empire when I finish Fiasco and other books on my desk;
Premium Link Upgrade

Holly Morgan was nice. :)
 
The candidate Mitt Romney has already made a strong pre election commitment to building a vastly bigger, better military, so how much bigger does it have to get with no real threat from the Russians anymore?

To stay one step ahead of their rivals. So they can still be the big dog in town:thefinger
 
To stay one step ahead of their rivals. So they can still be the big dog in town:thefinger

He has softened his ads about that quite a bit. I think he's the whack job of the bunch. In one interview I saw, he condemned McCain for changing his position on issues and then the host show film clips of he himself changing his position, but according to Romney, that was different.
 
He has softened his ads about that quite a bit. I think he's the whack job of the bunch. In one interview I saw, he condemned McCain for changing his position on issues and then the host show film clips of he himself changing his position, but according to Romney, that was different.

I think I was watching "Hardball" with Chris Matthews and his guests were joking that the latest criticism about Mitt is he looks more like a Nightly News Anchor then a president. I thought that was funny.

You're exactly right. When Mitt talks about other candidate's changing positions and flip-flopping...I just roll my eyes and laugh....:rolleyes:
 
There is never going to be a peaceful middle east so whats the point in trying, and now that we've fucked it up even more ......

It's widely said the Bush administration is the best thing that could have happened to unifying Arabs the world over.
 
Back
Top