A high-risk sex offender may soon be released

[Will E Worm]

Man classified as sexual predator seeks release to rural Fairfield neighborhood

Solano County officials are getting the word out that a man classified by the state as a high-risk sex offender may soon be released to live in a rural Fairfield community.

Fraisure E. Smith, 51, is now in custody at a state hospital. He was sent to prison in 2006 after pleading no contest to a charge of assault with intent to commit a sex crime. The state’s dadabase of sex offenders classifies Smith as a sexually violent predator. The database shows a prior conviction for forcible rape.

A review of court records indicates that Smith’s initial release date was in October 2007, but he was classified as a sexually violent predator under the state’s Sexually Violent Predators Act and kept in custody after a jury agreed with the state’s assessment. He was placed with the state Department of Mental Health for an indeterminate period.

Smith is seeking release to live in a home on Willotta Drive in rural Fairfield. Willotta Drive is located off Rockville Road, east of Suisun Valley Road and near the Solano Community College campus.

The Sheriff’s Office has scheduled a community meeting at 6 p.m. Thursday at the Clayton Fire House so those who are interested in Smith’s case can have their questions answered. The fire house is located at 4965 Clayton Road in rural Suisun City.

A public hearing about the state’s placement recommendation for Smith is scheduled at 9 a.m. March 24 in Department 18 of Solano County Superior Court, 530 Union Ave. in Fairfield.

High-risk sex offenders are identified by the state Department of Justice as those who have a high risk of reoffending and who may pose a greater danger to the public than other offenders, according to a Sheriff’s Office press release.

Information about Smith’s recommended release to the Willotta Drive area was released under Penal Code Section 290, which is commonly known as Megan’s Law. Megan’s Law also led to the creation of the state’s database of sex offenders, which is accessible to the public at meganslaw.ca.gov. It’s illegal to use the information contained in the sex registry to discriminate against or to harass a sex registrant.

For more information on the case, call Detective Carrie Hollar of the Sheriff’s Office’s Investigation’s Bureau at 784-7050.

http://www.dailyrepublic.com/news/c...eeks-release-to-rural-fairfield-neighborhood/


Why?

He's high-risk, he should have been executed.


At least placed in a high security work camp.

 

[Deepcover]

I am against execution. I'm sure he'll be under watch by LE

 

[Johan]

He was placed with the state Department of Mental Health for an indeterminate period.

So basically, Will wants to execute people with mental issues. You know who used to do that ? The Nazis.

 

[Will E Worm]

I am against execution. I'm sure he'll be under watch by LE

How about executions for the most violent and unremorseful?

Work camps for life, for the others.

So basically, Will wants to execute people with mental issues. You know who used to do that ? The Nazis.

Who said that? Not me.

Also, 'nazis?'


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law

Most lawyers will say anything to get their clients off.


Even thought they know they are gukltiy. Like Hillary did with a pedophile.

 

[Luxman]

Most sex offenders have psychological problems, especially child molesters, but most sex offenders are also created because they grew up in abusive and/or sexist environments and they don't think it's wrong or they believe that they have the right to commit a sex crime.
Most criminals can be successfully rehabilitated with audio subliminal programming, but unfortunately this won't happen, because there's more money in a system with a lot of criminals to process.

 

[Deepcover]

How about executions for the most violent and unremorseful?

I am against it and the same goes for torture and (even though you didn't ask me) i'm anti-war so there you have it