9/11 Inside Work?

That was a argument from authority fallacy I believe. The evidence is all that matters. Just saying "I have a friend..." doesn't cut it. An anecdote about a hypothteical Phd. chemist... dunno. Name of expert, and EVIDENCE.


What conspiracies?

Well.your comments let me know that you don't know what you are talking about.My friends degree isn't "hypothetical" neither anecdotal.

My point was that with his first hand knowledge of chemistry and being part of the scientific community,he can corroborate some of the scientific facts that were presented in the movie Zeitgeist to a far better degree more than just some average Joe that doesn't know the difference between a beaker and a Bunsen Burner.

Unless someone else here is a Phd Chemist,I think that I'll sway more to his side of what's true and not in regards to the chemistry subjects discussed in the film.
 

Facetious

Moderated
I thought that this thread was more or less a hypothetical, ummm sampler, if you will. No need for elevated blood pressures. This is fun stuff !


[ . . Apparently lots of folks had daddys they couldn't trust or something . . .]

if at all, looking at the demographics of the last 20 + years. :(
But that's OK, "we're here to help", said the government. We shall follow suit. :)


OK, now more esoteric stuff - :shy:

What do you guys say to those individuals, (not me now !, I just want a reaction) who say that an errant airliner did not crash into the Pentagon ?
 
Most engineers disagree about the steel being weakened. Steel loses half of it's strengh at 1100 degrees. Jet fuel burn from 800 degrees to 1500 degress. Also, the crash propelled jet fuel through building, and knocked off fire proofing. Although the latter was probably less of a factor actually.























Why would it have? The leading hypothesis that steel weaken and floors sagged which put stress on the columns on the sides which started collapse.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=4

Well, regular houses could reach upto 1500 degress, we call that a flashover, so I would think that jet fuel and other combustibles in the building would reach a higher temp.?

Well, also thats the tricky part with buildings, some weaken on the sides to make a "V", other fall on one side & some pancake! It seems that the buildings pancaked but, at a rapid pace thats what is kinda puzzling/weird!!
 

ratbastid

Closed Account
They can't just, you know, lower the plane?? The WTC are the highest buildings in New York City aren't they?

Didn't they go through pilot training?



umm no.
Its not that easy....they would have had to be guided in, courses completely re-written and lower the plane well before those "tallest buildings in New York" were even close to being within site.
This was an "approved" mission (from the inside- It Would HAVE to be!!!!), and well planned out. Not by cave dwellers half the world away.
 

Violator79

Take a Hit, Spunker!
umm no.

This was an "approved" mission (from the inside- It Would HAVE to be!!!!), and well planned out. Not by cave dwellers half the world away.

Not only that, but I've read reports and heard experts say that not a single one of those terrorists could even fly a plane, not to mention a plane the size of the jets that were expertly guided into the buildings by some aviation expert and not some third world person with a limited education and a lack of flying abilities.

Let's assume for a second that the terrorists were flying the planes, and take into account they had no flight training at all. Those planes would've gone down long before they even reached NYC, let alone flying them with expert precision into 2 buildings. Terrorists flying those planes without help? I don't think so.
 
One more thing.

The towers were build to withstand the impact of a 747 jet, and not fall to the ground.

Ask the people who were in the ground floor about how they felt an explosion from the basement before the planes hit.

People need to realize that your governing officials don't care about you at all. They care about money. They just know that in order for people to follow what they beleive in, they need to strike fear into you.

People are as stupid as they think you are. And they enjoy the fact that you support them. It just means that you accept that they own you, and can tell you to do whatever they want you to do, and you will do it willingly.

You hate it when people tell you what to do, so why should a bunch of fuck face low life assholes have control over what descisions you make in life? Just because they throw around words and act like they are higher ranked than you doesn't mean they are any better. The fact that you let these people have that authority gives them that power. They are no better than you. You are a human being, they are a human being. No more, no less.

Wake the fuck up, or commit suicide. One of the two.
 
Foreign wars costing money? The Iraq war is one of the most profitable wars ever surely?

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/19/washington/19cost.html

I don't know how much the US has earned thanks to the war in Iraq, but it cost quite a lot according to the article I posted.

I cannot say for sure if there's a profit or a loss, but looking at the costs, I'm gonna guess it's a loss & not a profit the US is making in Iraq at the moment.
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/19/washington/19cost.html

I don't know how much the US has earned thanks to the war in Iraq, but it cost quite a lot according to the article I posted.

I cannot say for sure if there's a profit or a loss, but looking at the costs, I'm gonna guess it's a loss & not a profit the US is making in Iraq at the moment.

The costs of a war are paid through tax-money. The profits are earned by companies. So the politician who "coincidently" owns (or has ties to) these particular companies (for example oil & construction) can expect fat profits.
...while not one dollar of the warcost is from his pocket. It´s your pocket the money for a war comes from. Destroy and rebuild is the golden rule to earn (personal) profits.
 
For all you Idoits out there that think it was an inside job, Put 500lbs on your back . hold it for 45 mins and let someone some and take your legs out, get it?
 

ratbastid

Closed Account
For all you Idoits out there that think it was an inside job, Put 500lbs on your back . hold it for 45 mins and let someone some and take your legs out, get it?

the evidence is all there, .....if you choose to look :dunno:
 

ChefChiTown

The secret ingredient? MY BALLS
For all you Idoits out there that think it was an inside job, Put 500lbs on your back . hold it for 45 mins and let someone some and take your legs out, get it?

No, I don't get it.

You're calling people idiots, but you're comparing human legs to a skyscraper? Leg muscles get tired; steel doesn't. So, what are you trying to say?

:dunno:
 
I know it's hard for some people to believe, but usually the simplest most common sense answers really are the truth instead of some convoluted conspiracy theories that have to rely on an ever more fantastic turns of events to occur.
 
All im trying to say is the heat comprimised the steel. Once it gave it was all over. Idiots may have been a bit much, But I have never been one to fall into the "Inside stuff". Sure secret bomb and Military testing I agree, but killing Americans. Shutting down Wall Street umm i dont think so.
 
I know it's hard for some people to believe, but usually the simplest most common sense answers really are the truth instead of some convoluted conspiracy theories that have to rely on an ever more fantastic turns of events to occur.

Unfortunately,this was a very unusual situation with very unusual circumstances.

I don't think that Occam's Razor applies here.
 
on this topic i just attended a talk given by a couple of profs not far from where i live it was free and widely advertised on the radio and in the paper about 60 people attended and was mainly a large group of local PHDs and teachers doctors and intellectuals my self not included just open minded . there is an ever growing movement by these people throughout the world called Truthers seeking the truth and wanting a full investigation into 9/11
 
on this topic i just attended a talk given by a couple of profs not far from where i live it was free and widely advertised on the radio and in the paper about 60 people attended and was mainly a large group of local PHDs and teachers doctors and intellectuals my self not included just open minded . there is an ever growing movement by these people throughout the world called Truthers seeking the truth and wanting a full investigation into 9/11

They're all morons.

Every single one.

:cool:
 
Suppose 9/11 was indeed an inside job, how would the average American react? Would it create a revolution or would you just let it go?
 
Suppose 9/11 was indeed an inside job, how would the average American react? Would it create a revolution or would you just let it go?

First let me say I do think for one second it was any type of 'inside job".Was some negligence involved, probably (it was ridiculously easy for them to get control of those airplanes,all you needed was hardened closed cockpit doors to prevent that) but no inside job.

But if as you say lets suppose it was, while maybe not a revolution there would be a lot of reaction.If that ever was proven those involved would be in real danger of being executed and even I as someone against the death penalty would only half heartedly argue for life imprisonment.9/11 caused so much death and expenditure and disruption for america that the anger and demand for their blood would be overwhelming.
 
Top