2-way street?

[atxraised]

Names are fictional it's just for story purposes.

A friend of mine Bill wants to have a threesome with his wife ***** and her best friend Jane. Jane is bi and wants to do it. You would figure ***** would be ok with it but she said no. Reason: She doesn't trust Bill to have the threesome and ended there. Bill did cheat on ***** with a co-worker of his.

But ***** wants to have a threesome with Bill and his best friend George. George, who I know very well, has been wanting to bone ***** for some time. So when ***** asked Bill if they could have a threesome with George, he said no. Bill had the same reason as ***** of why he didn't want to do it. ***** is pissed off cuz she said Bill has no reason to feel that way. ***** has been suspected of cheating on Bill but never been actually caught.

Well at the end Bill didn't get his threesome but ***** did.

So the question is: Is it ok for Bill not to get his threesome but for ***** is cool. Is it also ok for ***** to get so pissed off at Bill for his concerns?

What you guys think?

 

[Namreg]

trust issues are between you and your wife, bill. talk to her.

 

[Spleen]

I think ***** is a bitch.

 

[GregCentauro]

What you guys think?

I don't think. Never. It hurts my brain.

 

[JacknCoke]

uh Bill should have never done the 3some with George unless wifey agrees to do a 3some with the girl of his choosing. However the wife should no longer be with Bill since he is untrustworthy in the first place.

 

[LaLiLuLeLohan]

uh Bill should have never done the 3some with George unless wifey agrees to do a 3some with the girl of his choosing. However the wife should no longer be with Bill since he is untrustworthy in the first place.

Yeah, I don't understand why "Bill" would be cool with his best friend fucking his wife to begin with, but especially while feeling slighted on the deal.

Sounds to me that maybe "Bill" and "*****" should have really worked on their relationship, and figured out what they want from each other and what they what to do for each other, before complicated things even more by bringing in other people.

If both of them are open enough to explore the idea of bringing somebody else into the bedroom, there should have been a lot more communication and thought, rather than negotiation.

 

[Shadowfax 10]

'***** have been suspected of cheating on Bill'

Have Bill got evidence of ***** wrong doing, If Bill haven't then I think Bill should talk to ***** about it.

If Bill have got evidence here what I think.

I don't think it fair that ***** should have a threesome when Bill can't have a threesome. ***** sound like a bitch so I think Bill should go and have a threesome whether ***** like it or not, that way Bill and ***** are even then perhap they should talk about the future of their relationship.

 

[jasonk282]

You both need to go to counceling. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

 

[jod0565]

They should not be married.

 

[Hot Mega]

Names are fictional it's just for story purposes.

A friend of mine Bill wants to have a threesome with his wife ***** and her best friend Jane. Jane is bi and wants to do it. You would figure ***** would be ok with it but she said no. Reason: She doesn't trust Bill to have the threesome and ended there. Bill did cheat on ***** with a co-worker of his.

But ***** wants to have a threesome with Bill and his best friend George. George, who I know very well, has been wanting to bone ***** for some time. So when ***** asked Bill if they could have a threesome with George, he said no. Bill had the same reason as ***** of why he didn't want to do it. ***** is pissed off cuz she said Bill has no reason to feel that way. ***** has been suspected of cheating on Bill but never been actually caught.

Well at the end Bill didn't get his threesome but ***** did.

So the question is: Is it ok for Bill not to get his threesome but for ***** is cool. Is it also ok for ***** to get so pissed off at Bill for his concerns?

What you guys think?

Solution: Bill and ***** get divorced so Bill can fuck Jane and ***** can fuck George all they want.:o

 

[~~whimsy~~]

They should not be married.

That's what I'm thinking.

They seem to want best of both worlds and secretly more. Both cheating on each other. Well, one suspected, but yeah. Whatever.

Kind of messed up I guess.

 

[DJCowboy]

Names are fictional it's just for story purposes.

A friend of mine Bill wants to have a threesome with his wife ***** and her best friend Jane. Jane is bi and wants to do it. You would figure ***** would be ok with it but she said no. Reason: She doesn't trust Bill to have the threesome and ended there. Bill did cheat on ***** with a co-worker of his.

But ***** wants to have a threesome with Bill and his best friend George. George, who I know very well, has been wanting to bone ***** for some time. So when ***** asked Bill if they could have a threesome with George, he said no. Bill had the same reason as ***** of why he didn't want to do it. ***** is pissed off cuz she said Bill has no reason to feel that way. ***** has been suspected of cheating on Bill but never been actually caught.

Well at the end Bill didn't get his threesome but ***** did.

So the question is: Is it ok for Bill not to get his threesome but for ***** is cool. Is it also ok for ***** to get so pissed off at Bill for his concerns?

What you guys think?

I believe the trains will pass each other at 4:50pm.

 

[knowone]

I believe the trains will pass each other at 4:50pm.

That was last week's test. This one is which tunnel the train gets to go in.

 

[JacknCoke]

Solution: Bill and ***** get divorced so Bill can fuck Jane and ***** can fuck George all they want.:o

Yeah precisely:nanner:

 

[hillhopper]

That was last week's test. This one is which tunnel the train gets to go in.

It would be the Red tunnel!

Sounds like both have been wanting to practice 'open' marriage but if its a tit for tat thing it won't work unless both parties agree to things satisfactorily of both.

 

[lostwood_7]

I know a lawyer named "Neal" that could draw up the paperwork on this