Search results

Reform Jews side with the Palestinians. lol Oh please. Advocating a two state solution is not siding with the Palestinians. If it was every president since Ike would be guilty of doing so. That doesn’t make them vermin, it makes them retarded. Yeah because, having never experienced any, jews...

I appreciate the irony of this dumb (not to mention incredibly juvenile) fuck calling anyone else dumb :thumbsup:

I'd think y'all would agree with that take. After all, most american jews are liberals. Which equates to being vermin, according to you two.

Well gee instead of "dismantling" me you're just affirming what I've said. From your first link: Founded in 1866, the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) extended into almost every southern state by 1870 and became a vehicle for white southern resistance to the Republican Party’s Reconstruction-era policies...

Are the peddlers of leftwing propaganda “ opportunists” also? Yeah some of them are. I like moments like these because the rabid leftwinger in you pops out from under the mask of perceived reason LOL Uh huh. Relating historical fact is being a rabid leftwinger :rolleyes: I like moments like...

Remember who founded the KKK? Democrats. Yeah, Georges. Southern democrats. Who were all hard core conservatives. Maybe brush up on american history before walking out on that unsupportable plank again.

That means so much coming from a guy who's destroyed his own credibility.

I appreciate that he can relate to my need to present ID when I buy groceries. :rofl:

The guy is nothing more than an opportunist preying on the dumb cuntery of the modern right. And there's certainly no lack of that. Cha ching $$$ One elemental fact utterly destroys his whole premise: the historical democrats he demonizes were all hard right conservatives. But in this day...

:) Yeah that had nothing to do with the fact he used what he knew to be dubious and/or cherry picked intel to get approval for pre-emptively invading a sovereign nation we'd been warned by onsite inspectors had no WMD only to find that...surprise!...it did in fact have no WMDs. As a result over...

Trump isn’t fueled by emotion I'm sorry you're right. Actually he's fueled by a combination of ego and emotion. Name five books Obama is known for reading. I'll give you a whole lot more than 5 https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/16/politics/barack-obama-reading-list-mitch-landrieu/index.html...

Boy do I hear that. Here are just a few things I hated about that **** stain... 1) I hated having a thoughtful, classy, mature adult as president. Much better to have an emotion-driven ******. 2) I hated having a well read intellectual as president. Give me a comic book reader with the...

Can't stand any of them. Even as a *** I thought they tasted like ****.

So would that make her a red snapper? :confused:

They are. Wait. She said the defense budget was increased by 700 billion? Dios mio that IS idiotic. I even coached her on this but apparently she wasn't listening. Looks like it's time for papi to apply the paddle :spanking:

,,, Go Russia Go! :nanner: Fuck those NATO deadbeats :thefinger

For the sake of what argument? He WAS being misleading (to put it mildly). I'm not going to revisit what Obama did or didn't do for the 40th time. His explanation makes complete sense to me. We KNOW had he ponied up pre-election you'd have blown a gasket over him committing unbridled election...

Yeah pretty much. But I already told you I'm working with her on that ;)

I'm content with Obama's explanation of why he didn't go public before the election. It makes complete sense to me. But all I'm really addressing here is that when Limply revisited Obama's comments on rigging elections he lied about their context. Not that that's earth-shattering news. It's...

... That's my girl! :heart:

Agree he would get demolished. Saw him on one of the late night talk shows last night and when the idea was brought up the response from the audience was definitely underwhelming.

Surprise surprise. Fake news from Limpy. Who, according to the article, claimed "Obama was telling everybody the Russians could not hack the presidential election. Obama was telling people that it was too massive and widespread and intricate, it couldn’t be done.” In fact Obama wasn't...

Oh baby!

lol No "then and now" photos allowed. Candidates to be judged on photos posted. Really?? Well then, you can be my wing man anytime :nannerf1:

I don't think a meltdown is necessary. He made some 'uge promises so sluggish growth or flat lining would probably leave Trump vulnerable. Plenty of other issues to ****** him on, as well. We were already on our way to that near all time record low unemployment when he took office, so :dunno:

Some new nominees...yeah or nay?

Obama dropped a few bombs. But there's no way he comes close to matching the sheer volume of Trump, or the complete refusal to retract or correct.

I can't speak for the supporters of any of those three. Like Johan they probably think they can win without a meltdown, so no need to root for one. I just think they're wrong.

That was great. Well worth the watch.

They're probably upset that, despite their best efforts, they can't even begin to match the liar-in-chief. The man really IS a wonder.

I agree. Again with the one disclaimer being if another major economic disaster hits in the interim.

This BOMBSHELL is 3 months old. Was filed by a Trump toady representing a pro Trump organization. Any recent news or can we just add this to the dumpster?

She's my current girlfriend, so obviously she gets a major :thumbsup: from me. BC I totally agree on the grannyish thing. That's why some of these nominees worked for me in their youth but don't anymore. I'm closing in on 60 but my wife is 36.

Not even a young Brittany or Swede? Wow. Ok then. You're only one behind now. My ******* told me she caught a ban at one point, but not a perma ban. Ha ha I found a nice post she made to you :D https://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?79668-Myspace&p=785283&viewfull=1#post785283 :rubbel:

Kim Ahn looks ok for 60 plus, and I do like asians, but I've already got one of these in my stable - McConnell's wife - so I'll pass here. Both of them would have been definite yeahs early in their careers. Remember when Brittany was an OCSM? omg she was a wild thang. Didn't she end up...

They really are sinister. All these years Billy Boy pretended to like George when in fact he was just waiting for his former doctor to take a bike ride.

Assuming I'm just supposed to choose which photo appeals to me the most without considering who the models are I'll go with Gig Gangel.

The Clintons again, eh?

Really hoping this lying, self-promoting, Putin operative gets all that's coming to him. Guy is pure trash.

Georges maybe you're forgetting that unemployment was already low and steadily falling as he left office. And yeah, there are vulnerabilities to this economy. Let's just hope it doesn't fall prey to them.

:wtf: I read the article. He's imploring dems to steer a moderate course. Is there something wrong with that that I'm missing somehow?

I don't like tats either, but I'd jump Ivy Snow any day. I'd probably even give Anna Bell Peaks a shot just cause I like her face, eyes, hair and general fitness. Your thoughts?

Her face/eyes are essentially nice, imo. But she's another who, over time, really packed on some tonnage that detracted from the appeal of both body and face. Not so much petite necessarily but it's true I have a narrower range of body types I'm attracted to than you, so yeah that contributes...

Nina Mercedez - no, although you did chose a good picture of her, Georges. No to Dannii, Sharon and Aileen Yes to Denisse Gomez (you're doing good so far, fox) I think that puts me ahead by 3 in the pickiest competition :D

So far we're tied, but BC hasn't chimed in on georges last three yet. she's a mighty fine woman. I'll tell her you said hi. Asshole :thefinger

Porcha and Nina get nos. Brit never had a great face but I'd still have given her a go up until about Y2K. After that she started getting very hard and matronly looking, body included, which would lead to a nay.

Yeah yeah rub it in my face again that you did Jill Stein and I didn't. Fuckin asshole :thefinger

:1orglaugh That's actually a perfect description :thumbsup: That's why I used the word "female" in the OP - 3 times! Can't trust these fuckers :1orglaugh

John you are right. Jill Kelly is a heavy no. Never did find her attractive. To me she always had a very ho hum and kinda grandmotherly face plus a pretty bad boob job. Worse yet, an actress colleague of hers I was tight with informed me she was a total bitch. Jesse Jane is a yes. Gets...