Performer Guide Netvideogirls.com
- Thread starter Sithlord
- Start date
Yes, toward the end
.
Well... I would not give extreme credence to that Discover Magazine article, as much as it purports to be scientific. We may see from the comment writers that not all are swayed, and many sound pretty knowledgeable. Even the article writer is not conclusively convinced: "So there you have it: it’s probably just *** after all!"
From what I have come to believe based on sources I've read, the emitted fluids have traces of *****, but most of the liquid is something else. Even here (while the point here is that it's mostly *****) that concession is made in their "conclusions": "Although a marginal contribution of prostatic secretions to the emitted fluid often exists.”
At any rate, the composition of the liquid is not as critical as the process. Any man who has been with a woman who squirts knows that her wondrous ejaculating has nothing to do with peeing. Peeing is a steady stream of getting rid of bodily wastes. Squirting involves a short burst of released fluids resulting from sexual excitement. Squirting is not incontinence... otherwise, the emission of the "*****" would continue. (You know, once you start the urination process, it's hard to stop.) Those who equate squirting with peeing need to pause before arriving at that dastardly conclusion; I love women who squirt, not every woman can squirt, and the last thing we would want to do is to give women the stigma of doing a disgusting thing, and discourage them from squirting (and also give them a roadblock to their sexual enjoyment)... particularly given conflicting scientific studies.
.
Well... I would not give extreme credence to that Discover Magazine article, as much as it purports to be scientific. We may see from the comment writers that not all are swayed, and many sound pretty knowledgeable. Even the article writer is not conclusively convinced: "So there you have it: it’s probably just *** after all!"
From what I have come to believe based on sources I've read, the emitted fluids have traces of *****, but most of the liquid is something else. Even here (while the point here is that it's mostly *****) that concession is made in their "conclusions": "Although a marginal contribution of prostatic secretions to the emitted fluid often exists.”
At any rate, the composition of the liquid is not as critical as the process. Any man who has been with a woman who squirts knows that her wondrous ejaculating has nothing to do with peeing. Peeing is a steady stream of getting rid of bodily wastes. Squirting involves a short burst of released fluids resulting from sexual excitement. Squirting is not incontinence... otherwise, the emission of the "*****" would continue. (You know, once you start the urination process, it's hard to stop.) Those who equate squirting with peeing need to pause before arriving at that dastardly conclusion; I love women who squirt, not every woman can squirt, and the last thing we would want to do is to give women the stigma of doing a disgusting thing, and discourage them from squirting (and also give them a roadblock to their sexual enjoyment)... particularly given conflicting scientific studies.
.
Zothy, you are absolutely entitled to stop, especially given your sensational record of being so giving and helpful in the past. (And I'm sure you haven't really "stopped," at least not entirely, because like the scorpion who takes a piggyback ride on the back of that frog, it's in your nature to be giving.)
But for the rest of us, what should this mean? Every man for himself?
If so, what would be the purpose of boards like these?
In my past posts in this thread, I have squawked about the general nature of Freeones members. (Not just Freeones, of course, but since we are at Freeones, we should single it out.) Many members exhibit no personality. No warmth. (Their robotic three-word comments make it less fun to participate.) It's just in and out, for many; they want something, and as soon as they get it, they're out. Many are ill-mannered. They rarely give credit to the gracious Zothys of the world who help them out. Many begin threads and lack the responsibility to upkeep them. I can go on and on.
But what can you do? Sure, you can throw up your hands and declare, these sons of bitches are on their own. On the other hand... that's just the ugly reality we have come to accept. Those of us who are helpful and wish to impart information others may benefit by will continue to do so.
In addition, those of us who have a "knack" to provide knowledge should not assume everyone is like them. Even when something is Googled, the answer isn't always immediately there. And even if the answers are readily available, it's very nice of those who provide the answers, to save the nogoodniks the trouble of looking around. (Sometimes we find ourselves to be needy, and in the ranks of those very nogoodniks... even the best of us.)
From my perspective, I am deeply appreciative to those such as Sweetmullet who have consistently taken the trouble to let us know about the new broad on the block. Now if those of us who have been unselfishly performing such a service feel like they have had enough and quit, I would not blame them one bit... they will always deserve our undying thanks. Yet let us not lose sight of the purpose of this thread: if we know something relevant that is new... or old... it is our duty to report it. So that everyone may benefit, now and in the future.
.
This is a wrong link to Samantha Roxx,,,,,,,,,, should be Angelina Bonnet new on Free ones from ATK
Last edited:
How do I put a photo up?
try reading stuff. the amber girl has been identified years ago. try searching. mommy isn't here to do the work for you.
.
I have not been keeping up with NVG, but today I familiarized myself with a few of the new. (New for me, anyway.) There was one called Julia (pictured at left) that I knew I wasn't going to be able to get into, because her bodily deformation was just too busy. (She is very pretty otherwise.) Then there was Scarlett (whom I had recently identified as Scarlet Datz... but only because I was at one of those two modeling agency sites and the name matched), and I thought, this is more like it. What an extremely attractive young woman...
Premium Link Upgrade Premium Link Upgrade ................... Premium Link Upgrade Premium Link Upgrade
... Then she took her clothes off, and I was surprised that I couldn't watch. Normally, I can think beyond the horrible ink and focus on the "good parts," but she had a gigantic thing on her left shoulder that kept ramming into my eye, and the rest of the clutter kept getting in the way ... wow. I had to stop. It actually started to get painful.
She's beautiful, too. What a shame.
I noticed a lot of new actresses have been appearing in recent NVG/CCHD episodes, and things have been getting very quiet on this thread. So I thought I'd perform a service by visiting those two modeling sites (we were told 90% of the women come from those sites, so I figured I'd manage to snatch some I.D.'s); one lady who played "Karsen" in a an episode from last month (already identified as Karson Kennedy) caught my eye, because I thought, okay, pretty, and at least she hasn't deformed herself but then I saw another yucky mark, and took a closer look. (See Premium Link Upgrade .)
Even though Ms. Kennedy deserves kredit for not going overboard, you'd think she would pick something that's nice (like, I dunno, a butterfly or something) but... of all things... she went with a skull and crossbones?? (Has ugliness become the new beauty? Yes, it may be liberating, but...)
Interestingly, I couldn't come up with one I.D. There's an actress who looks very nice (Sophia. See Premium Link Upgrade ), and for some reason I thought she'd be a sure bet. It's possible many of the new NVG ladies were featured on these modeling agency sites, but I didn't recognize anybody. ('Course, unless an actress looks very distinctive, you need to really familiarize yourself with a lady's appearance.) It's not easy. (At least it's not easy for some of us; probably most of us.) All the more reason for us to be grateful to those who have been kind enough to consistently share their I.D. findings.
.
I have not been keeping up with NVG, but today I familiarized myself with a few of the new. (New for me, anyway.) There was one called Julia (pictured at left) that I knew I wasn't going to be able to get into, because her bodily deformation was just too busy. (She is very pretty otherwise.) Then there was Scarlett (whom I had recently identified as Scarlet Datz... but only because I was at one of those two modeling agency sites and the name matched), and I thought, this is more like it. What an extremely attractive young woman...
Premium Link Upgrade Premium Link Upgrade ................... Premium Link Upgrade Premium Link Upgrade
... Then she took her clothes off, and I was surprised that I couldn't watch. Normally, I can think beyond the horrible ink and focus on the "good parts," but she had a gigantic thing on her left shoulder that kept ramming into my eye, and the rest of the clutter kept getting in the way ... wow. I had to stop. It actually started to get painful.
She's beautiful, too. What a shame.
I noticed a lot of new actresses have been appearing in recent NVG/CCHD episodes, and things have been getting very quiet on this thread. So I thought I'd perform a service by visiting those two modeling sites (we were told 90% of the women come from those sites, so I figured I'd manage to snatch some I.D.'s); one lady who played "Karsen" in a an episode from last month (already identified as Karson Kennedy) caught my eye, because I thought, okay, pretty, and at least she hasn't deformed herself but then I saw another yucky mark, and took a closer look. (See Premium Link Upgrade .)
Even though Ms. Kennedy deserves kredit for not going overboard, you'd think she would pick something that's nice (like, I dunno, a butterfly or something) but... of all things... she went with a skull and crossbones?? (Has ugliness become the new beauty? Yes, it may be liberating, but...)
Interestingly, I couldn't come up with one I.D. There's an actress who looks very nice (Sophia. See Premium Link Upgrade ), and for some reason I thought she'd be a sure bet. It's possible many of the new NVG ladies were featured on these modeling agency sites, but I didn't recognize anybody. ('Course, unless an actress looks very distinctive, you need to really familiarize yourself with a lady's appearance.) It's not easy. (At least it's not easy for some of us; probably most of us.) All the more reason for us to be grateful to those who have been kind enough to consistently share their I.D. findings.
.
Hello, Bitcher, and welcome to Freeones. I sensed your hesitation, as you asked your question.
Next time you are looking for an I.D. for a [NOBABE]Net Video Girl, [/NOBABE]best way to start is to travel to the "Page 57" Premium Link Upgrade and run a page search. (CONTROL key + "F" key.) If your lady appeared in an episode after the guide endpoint (June 2016), then conduct a thread search. (See at top right, where you see "Thread Tools, Search Thread, Rate This Thread, Display"? These are only visible after you sign in. "Search Thread" is what you need to click on.)
On my page of results (and after I matched the face on the portrait you provided with the video), the top Premium Link Upgrade by Roynroyn (dated 2017-01-30, which I believe coincides with the release date of the episode) gives us the answer; her name is Premium Link Upgrade .
.
has anyone ID ally
Thank you very much. From next time onwards I'll try what you have suggested. Thank you.
Please check page 57 first, I think there have been a couple Ally's, if you don't see her look at thread 1754 above
