CNN reporter: Hillary Clinton became physically abusive after election night loss

Histrionics. That's what I'm watching with Megyn Kelly right now and her comparing Trump to a "hostage taker" and her the "hostage." Promoting her book of course.

I actually watched the election returns on CNN and not Fox because I couldn't bear to watch her cheering against Trump all night.

BTW Wolf Blitzer and John King did a smoking job on election night.
 

Mr. Daystar

In a bell tower, watching you through cross hairs.
I don't think so. Me thinks that when she started seeing the polls were wrong and states falling, she found herself a darkened room and softly sobbed. Couldn't face the ballroom of campaign supporters with balloons never to fall from the rafters. I hope she is feeling the warmth from those thousands of protesters that represented her base she hoped would vote for her.

Im going with this line of thinking. I have taken enough combinations of chemicals and ***** to know, if she was ***** and on even 10 mg of Valium, or any benzo, she would be sad and sullen, but shes not gonna be in a violent mood. Pissed at best. ***** only, hell yeah. Benzo only, doubt it. Mood leveler...not sure, never have, nor would take one for fun.
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
I took ativan for a couple weeks when I was having issues ********, that **** worked like a fucking charm.
 

Luxman

#TRE45ON
Are you actually trying to say that the housing bubble burst somehow makes GWB's presidency a disaster?

He actually dealt with it before Obama took office.

There was at least some economic prosperity during his tenure.

All Obama is concerned with is bringing people from the third world into this country, controlling 1/6 of the economy and climate change. That's it.

We haven't enjoyed 3 percent GDP under Obama.

That recession was going to happen whether Bush or Kerry were president.

Yes, Bush's presidency was a disaster.
The housing bubble, which cost Americans trillions, is still affecting the economy.
It could have been prevented, there were many people who warned Bush years before it happened, but as always, greed was the deciding factor.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/21/business/21admin.html


Then there's the little skirmish in Iraq, which was started by Bush, Cheney and their corporate warmonger buddies lying about WMD's.
In the Iraq invasion aka corporate war for profit, thousands of American soldiers were ********, tens of thousands of others were disabled for life, all their families were devastated, hundreds of thousands of Iraqis ****** and millions more had their lives destroyed...
It cost trillions of taxpayer dollars, most of which went into the pockets of Bush, Cheney and their buddies, the corporate arms dealers. And Americans will continue to pay for decades to come for Bush & Cheney's disastrous presidency.
Republican policies are driven primarily by greed.
You will never say anything against your party because to you it would be blasphemous, it's almost like a religion.
But that's all in the past, let's pretend it didn't happen, look forward and change all the laws to favor republican ideology, so we can feel smug about it...
 
Then there's the little skirmish in Iraq, which was started by Bush, Cheney and their corporate warmonger buddies lying about WMD's.

There's a difference between being wrong and lying. The Bush admin may have been wrong about WMDs and Iraq (along with British intelligence) but Barack Hussein LIED to the American people about his affordable care act. He knew at the time that "If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor." was false. The bill needed to be ****** before the public knew what was in it per Nancy Pelosi.


You will never say anything against your party because to you it would be blasphemous, it's almost like a religion.

It's almost like religion? Devoid of traditional religion, politics IS the religion of the left. That's why you see the tears flowing and the riots in the streets.


without getting into specifics, do you work Luxman?

I do, and it's for one of these evil corporations you rail against. And I have a job and make a decent living (for my tastes at least) because they're able to post a profit.

The profit motive gets things done.
 
Devoid of traditional religion (for the most part), politics IS the religion of the left. That's why you see the tears flowing and the riots in the streets.

Corrected. But even for them (liberal fucking catholics and others), political ideology is higher on the load order.
 
Yes, Bush's presidency was a disaster.
The housing bubble, which cost Americans trillions, is still affecting the economy.
It could have been prevented, there were many people who warned Bush years before it happened, but as always, greed was the deciding factor.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/21/business/21admin.html


Then there's the little skirmish in Iraq, which was started by Bush, Cheney and their corporate warmonger buddies lying about WMD's.
In the Iraq invasion aka corporate war for profit, thousands of American soldiers were ********, tens of thousands of others were disabled for life, all their families were devastated, hundreds of thousands of Iraqis ****** and millions more had their lives destroyed...
It cost trillions of taxpayer dollars, most of which went into the pockets of Bush, Cheney and their buddies, the corporate arms dealers. And Americans will continue to pay for decades to come for Bush & Cheney's disastrous presidency.
Republican policies are driven primarily by greed.
You will never say anything against your party because to you it would be blasphemous, it's almost like a religion.
But that's all in the past, let's pretend it didn't happen, look forward and change all the laws to favor republican ideology, so we can feel smug about it...

2004 called, it wants its whining back.
This economy is not symptomatic of the housing bubble, ********** regulations Obamacare Cap and Trade are what ails it.

Even Roosevelt and Truman didn't milk the Great Depression as Obama did the recession.
We'll be at 4 percent growth within 2 years.

BTW I can't stand GWB but I do like Cheney.
 
Because today's Democrats are the single most threat to this Republic.

Hands down.
For years Republicans told us that Obama was gonna find a way to stay in office even after his 2nd term will be over. Democrats didn't even achieve to bring the Republic down when they had control over the White House and the senate, I don't see how they would do that now that the GOP will control the White House, The Senate, the House of Representatives and the Supreme Court.
Or maybe you think Obama is gonna declare martial law before his 2nd term is over, to kep Trump out of the White House...
 
For years Republicans told us that Obama was gonna find a way to stay in office even after his 2nd term will be over. Democrats didn't even achieve to bring the Republic down when they had control over the White House and the senate, I don't see how they would do that now that the GOP will control the White House, The Senate, the House of Representatives and the Supreme Court.
Or maybe you think Obama is gonna declare martial law before his 2nd term is over, to kep Trump out of the White House...

Oh just zip it.

I don't recall anyone here claiming Obama was gonna impose martial law.

We have things under control over here now.

Don't you have some fucked up things to mind over on your end?
 
Are you actually trying to say that the housing bubble burst somehow makes GWB's presidency a disaster?

He actually dealt with it before Obama took office.

There was at least some economic prosperity during his tenure.

All Obama is concerned with is bringing people from the third world into this country, controlling 1/6 of the economy and climate change. That's it.

We haven't enjoyed 3 percent GDP under Obama.

That recession was going to happen whether Bush or Kerry were president.






+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The housing bubble was caused by the repeal of the something called the Glass/Stiegel act in 1990s by congress/senate and pres Clinton.
Some activity was in the 1960s admittedly

The glass/steagall act was put in from the great depression days to separate finance from commercial banking.
I remember there was one law maker who voted against it and warned of problems


Glass/steagall act

This article is about four specific provisions of the Banking Act of 1933, which is also called the Glass–Steagall Act. For the earlier piece of economic legislation, see Glass–Steagall Act of 1932.

The Glass–Steagall Act describes four provisions of the U.S. Banking Act of 1933 that limited securities, activities, and affiliations within commercial banks and securities firms.[1]

The Glass–Steagall Act also is used to refer to the entire Banking Act of 1933, after its Congressional sponsors, Senator Carter Glass (Democrat) of Virginia, and Representative Henry B. Steagall (D) of Alabama.[2] This article deals with only the four provisions separating commercial and investment banking. The article 1933 Banking Act describes the entire law, including the legislative history of the Glass–Steagall provisions separating commercial and investment banking. A separate 1932 law also known as the Glass–Steagall Act is described in the article Glass–Steagall Act of 1932.

Starting in the early 1960s, federal banking regulators interpreted provisions of the Glass–Steagall Act to permit commercial banks and especially commercial bank affiliates to engage in an expanding list and volume of securities activities.[3] Congressional efforts to "repeal the Glass–Steagall Act", referring to those four provisions (and then usually to only the two provisions that restricted affiliations between commercial banks and securities firms),[4] culminated in the 1999 Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act (GLBA), which repealed the two provisions restricting affiliations between banks and securities firms.[5]

By that time, many commentators argued Glass–Steagall was already "dead."[6] Most notably, Citibank's 1998 affiliation with Salomon Smith Barney, one of the largest US securities firms, was permitted under the Federal Reserve Board's then existing interpretation of the Glass–Steagall Act.[7] President Bill Clinton publicly declared "the Glass–Steagall law is no longer appropriate."[8]

Many commentators have stated that the GLBA's repeal of the affiliation restrictions of the Glass–Steagall Act was an important cause of the financial crisis of 2007–08.[9][10] Economists at the Federal Reserve, such as Ben Bernanke, have argued that the activities linked to the financial crisis were not prohibited (or, in most cases, even regulated) by the Glass–Steagall Act.[11][12][13]

the root cause was pure greed
 
You won't say that 2 years from now...

When 25 democrat seats are up in the senate vs. 8 for the the republicans?

Super majority? Trump has flipped the rust belt for the GOP. He said he'd show the republicans how to win and he did. They are coming to him and not vice versa.

bow down and recanize.

Make America Great Again.
 

Luxman

#TRE45ON
I don't **** people who vote republican, I just feel pity for them because they have delusional blind faith in their political and religious "leaders".
Most of them probably have never even read the bible. And most promises made by republican politicians are BS empty lies.
Took me a few years to realize that ALL religions were created by corrupt men to control and manipulate people.
I read the entire bible twice, when I was 15, and then at about 20. What was obvious was that what is written in the bible, and what is preached in church and practiced by religious people, were two different things. Most religious people are not even following the teachings in the bible correctly.
ALL religions are blasphemous against God, they all use God's name in vain.
The more I rejected religion and learned about science, the more I believed in a God.
Religion decreased my faith in a God. Science restored my faith in a God.
 
I don't **** people who vote republican, I just feel pity for them because they have delusional blind faith in their political and religious "leaders".

for fuck sake. Or maybe they voted Republican because they don't like the alternative? (See Donald Trump).

you are projecting like a ****** fucker.

who is hysterical after this election vs. 2012? Who had school **** singing praises to Barrack Hussein Obama .... mmm ..mmm. mmm? Religious blind faith and stupidity is prevalent on your side, otherwise the democrats would not be a viable party. You'd have the the leftist intellectuals and that's it. D.C. is solid democrat forever.
 

Luxman

#TRE45ON
for fuck sake. Or maybe they voted Republican because they don't like the alternative? (See Donald Trump).

you are projecting like a ****** fucker.

who is hysterical after this election vs. 2012? Who had school **** singing praises to Barrack Hussein Obama .... mmm ..mmm. mmm? Religious blind faith and stupidity is prevalent on your side, otherwise the democrats would not be a viable party.

Every time you write stuff like that you only re-affirm what I wrote.
Obama probably isn't Christian, he just said he was to get the religious votes, he's probably a Muslim.
 
Remember in the Wizard of Oz how the Wicked Witch of the West yells about how she's melting near the end? In that same tone of voice, I can almost imagine Hillary yelling, "But it was MY TURN. IT WAS MYYYYYY TURRRRNNNNNNNNNNNN" when she lost. Sadly, she didn't melt. The whole thing would be as funny as hell except for how horrible this whole thing is going to be for almost everybody else.
 
Every time you write stuff like that you only re-affirm what I wrote.
Obama probably isn't Christian, he just said he was to get the religious votes, he's probably a Muslim.

Obama is a liberal, first and foremost. It begins and ends there.

he's a true believer.

Wish we had a true idealogue like Obama in the white house but we'll make do.
 
Top