I didn't say or even imply that anywhere.
A large number of climate scientists who have spent collectively hundreds of years studying this **** agree with a high degree of certainty that the climate is changing and that carbon emissions have a significant role to play. Cancers like ace boobtoucher up there latch onto "high degree of certainty" and make the claim that this proves that they are wrong, while anyone with a basic understanding of scientific method knows that high degree of certainty is about as close to a guarantee as the scientific community is ever going to get you. But to me, what's most frustrating is the arrogance of scum like him who think they know better than all of these people who have studied for years and dedicated their lives to figuring this out. The ignorance coming out of the right these last few years is trying to pull us into a new dark age of stupidity and intolerance. For a good example of how stupid ace actually is, click on his last link up there and read it, it actually contradicts his argument, while the third one is an op-ed from forbes by a single contributor saying that all the climatologists who explained the cause of this winter's polar vortexes are clearly wrong because duh.
FFS, the most compelling case for climate change is being made by the republicans, if they don't believe it, then it must be real, they're so consistently wrong about everything else, Benghazi, IRS, Obamacare, you'd think they'd learn to keep their god damn mouths shut.
Premium Link
Upgrade
"Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities, and most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position" but that's just fucking NASA, wtf do they know about science???
This is old news, the emails intercepted that showed the group who did most of the factfinding for the UN Report on GW had to hide contrary info so the report would show GW is a fact...busted.
And how fake numbers didn't work for the Demotard Talking points, so only the hardcore Demotards (like the oh so lame MondoIdiot) keep trying to convince other Demotards to nod wisely amongst themselves when talking about GW and the denier GOP.
Welll: guess what? NOTHINGS changed!
Premium Link
Upgrade
Analysis: Warmist John Cook’s fallacy ’97% consensus’ study is a marketing ploy — ‘Cook’s study shows 66% of papers didn’t endorse man-made global warming Cook calls this ‘an overwhelming consensus’ — ‘What does a study of 20 years of abstracts tell us about the global climate? Nothing. But it says quite a lot about the way government funding influences the scientific process…New paper confounds climate research with financial ******, is based on the wrong assumptions, uses fallacious reasoning, wasn’t independent, and confuses a consensus of climate scientists for a scientific consensus, not that a consensus proves anything anyway, if it existed. Given the monopolistic funding of climate science in the last 20 years, the results he finds are entirely predictable’ — ‘The number of papers is a proxy for funding’: ‘As government funding grew, scientists redirected their work to study areas that attracted grants. It’s no conspiracy, just Adam Smith at work. There was no funding for skeptical scientists to question the IPCC or the theory that man-made climate science exaggerates the warming. More than $79 billion was poured into climate science research and technology from 1989 to 2009. No wonder scientists issued repetitive, irrelevant, and weak results. How hard could it be? Taxpayers even paid for research on climate resistant oysters. Let no barnacle be unturned’
‘‘There were almost 12,000 studies — two-thirds of which (i.e, 8,000) expressed
no opinion. What consensus?‘
In a new soon to be published paper, John Cook claims ‘consensus’ on 32.6% of scientific papers that endorse man-made global warming: ‘You have to wonder how somebody can write (let alone read) the claims made here in the press release by Cook with a straight face."
It helps to be a Demotard, then it's
easy to keep a sincere idiot look pasted on their visiages!
According to MondoIdiot, ol"You're so fucking stupid it's painful to watch", 32.6% of the climatology researchers total hundreds of years among them; I guess that means those who DO NOT ENDORSE Global Warming /Man Caused Climate Change, total thousands of years of experience and they get the nod of credibility.
Well, MondoIdiot, I guess that means what I've always said,"You're so fucking stupid it's painful to watch.", is proven true once again.
:rofl2:
athead:
