If the gal doesn't suck cocks!

Marlo Manson

Hello Sexy girl how your Toes doing?
Ok the title would have been a little lengthy so I had too shorten it!

I've got this notion that if a gal doesn't suck cocks or perform B/G hardcore sex on DVD / photo galleries the gal ISN'T a legitimate PORNSTAR in my eyes!

I am sure there are many of you who will disagree and you have that right! all I am saying is for example eg. a girl who does nude posing / softcore modeling for penthouse or whatever nude work she does, is not should not be classified or considered as legitimate pornstars IMO.

I also feel that lesbian starlets are barely actual pornstars!

Technically, yes they are pornstars because they perform sex on DVD and photo galleries, but in my eyes lesbian performers are just a tease!

Of course this just my opinion because I don't care for lesbian sex scene's @ all!! I have often wondered who are they made for the guys or the gals??

I am a heterosexual male and lesbian sex does nothing for me in the way of entertainment or arousal! so is the whole lesbian sex thing for the gals then??

I can't relate too it other than seeing it. sure watching too beautiful females is nice but its boring as hell!! I think the girls are better served with a man??

So in review if the gal doesn't suck cocks or perform hardcore with guys she isn't really a PORNSTAR atleast that how I feel about it!!

So ummm do more of you agree with me or not?? remember this is only my opinion, there is NO RIGHT and NO WRONG answers!! I am more or less asking for your opinions on the subject!! its simple either you agree or you don't!! :dunno: :hatsoff:
 
Last edited:
In my mind, when i think pornstar i think hardcore and i think heterosexual or bisexual (FFM) actions (not pictures). So i agree with you, Marlo Manson.

While lesbian scenes are arousing in my books, it still is in the same category as gay scenes (which arent arousing at all for me). Those performers are also pornstars tho.

Just a matter of perception i guess :dunno:
 
IMO MM lesbian activities ARE porn. Most other sources--i.e. IaFD--lump it in with regular BG porn. At least you're able to distinguish types of porn on those types of sites.
 
Ehhh I guess most people don't agree with me?? I just have a hard time calling those gals that just pose nude or shoot photo sets / perform on a DVD using a dildo too get themselves off being refer to and called a pornstar in the true sense of its word / meaning!! :dunno:

When I think of pornstar.. I think of a sexy gal suckin a guys cock too almost all normal guys admiration and enthusiastic pleasure in everyway imaginable..

What follows a sexy gal giving a great messy blowjob?? hmmm lets see what fits?? :rolleyes: errr HARDCORE SEX!!! :nanner: IMHO thats the true definition of what being refered too as a genuine pornstar entails and describes!! :bowdown:

I think the proper term for softcore, naked photography, self pleasuring models and entertainers (dildo's / plugs...basically softcore) and lesbian sex should be considered and defined as adult nude photography / modeling, or a simple name for such a performer / entertainer should be an adultModel which is already used but should not be confused or included in the realm of being refered too as a pornstar!! :rolleyes:
 
I believe if they want to stay in the business they need to progress or find another line of work. But, that's their choice.

It's porn, but not penetration porn.

Which Nikki Nova needs to do. :tongue:

Also, Franziska Facella. She's been all talk so far.

She said in an interview, "I want to make lots of porno movies with guys and girls".
 
I believe if they want to stay in the business they need to progress or find another line of work. But, that's their choice.

It's porn, but not penetration porn.

Which Nikki Nova needs to do. :tongue:

Also, Franziska Facella. She's been all talk so far.

She said in an interview, "I want to make lots of porno movies with guys and girls".

I hear ya!! I am not saying or suggesting FO's should change their policies on who they determine too be pornstars or anything!

I am simply making a point on gorgeous girls like (eg.) Shay Laren whom I consider an adult model, despite the fact she performs in lesbian scene's!!

I want too see her (shay) and girls in the same context as (shay) sucking cock and having hardcore sex with a guy, then she is a PORNSTAR IMHO!! :rolleyes:
 
I'd have to agree with you. It's a little hard to classify Aria Giovanni and Nikki Nova as pornstars.

There's nothing more I'd like than to see Aria get fucked and for her to smoke the pole.

Shame it hasn't happened yet.
 
I disagree ONLY with the lesbian issue. I consider that sex, just like if a girl blows a guy, but doesn't fuck him, it's still sex. If the sex is in the form of DVD, internet, or still pictures doesn't matter either.
 
if she don't suck dick, kick her in the teeth.
 
i think lesbians are for me as well classified under "porn". They have sex with one another, or is sucking on a clit not woth mentioning, does it have to be a dick ???
Okay, if you only do vibrators ore machinery, even as arrousing as it is sometimes, it's not real penetration and for me not called "porn", i put it underneath "exotic scenery" because strippers are "exotic dansers",not "pornstars", even posing softcore I call "exotic scenery" and the girls who do it "exotic models" not "pornstars" ...
 
I disagree ONLY with the lesbian issue. I consider that sex.

I know its sex and I don't have as much a problem with lesbian starlets being refered too as PORNSTARS as I do with a nude adult model who just poses naked and or pleasuring herself with dildo's, plugs..etc..

i think lesbians are for me as well classified under "porn". They have sex with one another, or is sucking on a clit not woth mentioning, does it have to be a dick ???
...

I was trying not too let my personal feelings about WATCHING lesbian sex scene's interfere with my reasoning that lesbian starlets should or shouldn't be refered too as PORNSTARS, but I have never really enjoyed lesbian scene's?

*general question for all*

Not saying your answer will be how the majority feel about the issue, but, nobody has elaborated on my question... is lesbian sex, for guys or gals? both, hetrosexual guys? what gender or [what group of sexual orientation] is lesbian sex marketed for?? whether it be internet, DVD, or photo galleries??
 
Last edited:
the word pornSTAR is to me a misnomer.
lets face it, all a girl needs to have in this era to be a so called pornstar is a vagina and the abilty to allow a penis to enter it.

Clint Eastwood is a movie STAR.
Geoffrey Lewis is an actor.

Nikki Tyler is a porn STAR
Persuasion from bangmypussy.com is a porn actress.

:2 cents:
 
the word pornSTAR is to me a misnomer.
lets face it, all a girl needs to have in this era to be a so called pornstar is a vagina and the abilty to allow a penis to enter it.

Clint Eastwood is a movie STAR.
Geoffrey Lewis is an actor.

Nikki Tyler is a porn STAR
Persuasion from bangmypussy.com is a porn actress.

:2 cents:

Agree'd! I am saying girls who pose nude, pleasure themselves with dildo's / plugs should not be considered Pornstars..

I was just saying lesbian starlets are just barely Pornstars IMO! :thumbsup:

persuasion who? :D:dunno::hatsoff:
 
I know its sex and I don't have as much a problem with lesbian starlets being refered too as PORNSTARS as I do with a nude adult model who just poses naked and or pleasuring herself with dildo's, plugs..etc..



I was trying not too let my personal feelings about WATCHING lesbian sex scene's interfere with my reasoning that lesbian starlets should or shouldn't be refered too as PORNSTARS, but I have never really enjoyed lesbian scene's?

*general question for all*

Not saying your answer will be how the majority feel about the issue, but, nobody has elaborated on my question... is lesbian sex, for guys or gals? both, hetrosexual guys? what gender or [what group of sexual orientation] is lesbian sex marketed for?? whether it be internet, DVD, or photo galleries??

I think lesbian sex is for both. Some guys really dig watching 2 girls, I will, but only if the girls themselves really get to me. I know guys that say they like it because they can just picture themselves as "the meat in that sandwich". I would imagine that if homosexuals rent, or buy gay porn, a lesbian would rent or buy all girl movies. I personally think the term porn star is used a little to loosely. If a girl enters the adult industry, and makes one movie, she's a "porn star", but in my opinion, thats not really what a star is. Is she an adult actress, sure, but star power is something else. However, I surely will not begin to try and raise the issue of what constitutes a star. Back on topic...Girls Gone Wild, is not porn to me, PattyCake on line, is not a porn star...shes an adult model, but not a porn star. Peachez was an adult model, until she took that first cock in her mouth on the internet, now I believe she's a porn actress...with HUGE star potential, I think many would agree. I guess I could have made this easier by saying it like this. In a magazine, or on the intern, still pictures, solo girl = adult model. Boy girl, girl girl, soft core is adult material, hard core is porn. On the internet, or dvd/video, solo girl (including masturbation, and penetration), and soft core boy girl, and girl girl is adult material, but not porn, and hard core boy girl, or girl girl IS porn. Of course to try and relieve myself of some sort of backlash, I will state clearly...THIS IS ONLY MY OPINION, and not fact.
 
I agree with you Marlo. To be a pornstar means some sort of interaction with other people at some point. If a woman is only posing naked with sextoys, then soft porn. These women are nude centerfolds.
 
Back
Top