Help ID please?

will856

Bronze Member
Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2474.jpeg
    IMG_2474.jpeg
    102 KB · Views: 88
Not the right answer though, is it?

Your babe has brown eyes whereas Lara Hayes doesn't. And looking at those Babepedia pics... that girl appears to have much thicker eyebrows.
 
Not the right answer though, is it?

Your babe has brown eyes whereas Lara Hayes doesn't. And looking at those Babepedia pics... that girl appears to have much thicker eyebrows.
I got the ID off a FAP site which had that pic. I just ran it again and found it on a different FAP site which had the watermark of Lara Hayes OnlyFans web link on it.

However, another FAP site had the same pic with two different OnlyFans links, almost on top of each other and reversed. After "flipping" the pic, The top link read as emiliabrookss:
Premium Link Upgrade ​

The bottom link was partially readable, but I managed to find a second pic with just that link which read as emiliagivesessweets:
Premium Link Upgrade ​

To add to the confusion, I found another FAP which had two different OnlyFans links, again they were almost on top of each other and reversed, with one reading as something Parker.

On the OF page for Emilia Brooks girl, the profile pic didn't look anything like the original girl. On the other one, the OnlyFans page is not working.

Further digging seems to indicate Brooks and Sweets are supposedly the same girl with the aliases being:
_emilybrooksss_, emiliabrookss, emiliagivessweets, justemilia​
​
With all this convoluted mess, I'm questioning if the pic is really from OnlyFans. If so, it needs to be deleted. I'll let you make this call.
 
I got the ID off a FAP site which had that pic. I just ran it again and found it on a different FAP site which had the watermark of Lara Hayes OnlyFans web link on it.

However, another FAP site had the same pic with two different OnlyFans links, almost on top of each other and reversed. After "flipping" the pic, The top link read as emiliabrookss:
Premium Link Upgrade ​

The bottom link was partially readable, but I managed to find a second pic with just that link which read as emiliagivesessweets:
Premium Link Upgrade ​

To add to the confusion, I found another FAP which had two different OnlyFans links, again they were almost on top of each other and reversed, with one reading as something Parker.

On the OF page for Emilia Brooks girl, the profile pic didn't look anything like the original girl. On the other one, the OnlyFans page is not working.

Further digging seems to indicate Brooks and Sweets are supposedly the same girl with the aliases being:
_emilybrooksss_, emiliabrookss, emiliagivessweets, justemilia​
​
With all this convoluted mess, I'm questioning if the pic is really from OnlyFans. If so, it needs to be deleted. I'll let you make this call.
I didn't pull it from Onlyfans. I'm aware that's not allowed. I don't remember exactly where, but it wasn't OF.
 
Yes, it is 100% emiliabrookss IMO.

If you look at her OnlyFans profile pic, it is taken from the exact same angle (by herself) and enables you to compare her eyes/nose/features and it's an exact match.

Premium Link Upgrade

Anyway, it doesn't matter which website you get the image from - just where the actual image originates from. e.g. the website Fapello basically exists just to share pirated OnlyFans content and things of that nature, so if you see the fapello watermark in the corner then chances are it has been ripped off from somewhere.

The OnlyFans watermark is always conveniently cropped out of their pics.

So if we can all agree that this is the correct answer then we can safely dispose of the image and/or thread.
 
With all the bullshit of Photoshop and AI causing mass confusion, I have to question why someone would remove the watermark and replace it with a different watermark of another girl.

Some people are just fucking stupid!
 
Back
Top