Too bad continued scientific understanding on the subject has ruined my ********* nostalgia for dinosaurs now that I know things like deinonychus had feathers and the T-rex probably couldn't outrun a human. :1orglaugh
Shhh D-Rock. In the dino era we all know cute short hair redheads in leather were owning that age. The schools are just too chicken (heh heh) to teach the truth!
Omg Adam came inside my topic!!!
Quick! Clean up. Would you like something to *****? Don't mind the mess. Renovations and such.
Omg Adam is here :bowdown:
Ok... yeah.
Yeah dinosaurs. What's the deal with them? Feathers? How's that feather pillow????
:1orglaugh
- - - Updated - - -
I **** myself... I had one
One fucking chance![]()
Research seems to always find new "discoveries", sometimes even going full circle. After all, Pre-Jurrassic Park T-Rex was a lumbering sloth, and now it's gone back to that again. So you, and the games you play can take whatever interpretation you want and no one can prove you wrong. Well, until some billionaire manages to clone dinoDNA and open a theme park.Too bad continued scientific understanding on the subject has ruined my ********* nostalgia for dinosaurs now that I know things like deinonychus had feathers and the T-rex probably couldn't outrun a human. :1orglaugh
Research seems to always find new "discoveries", sometimes even going full circle. After all, Pre-Jurrassic Park T-Rex was a lumbering sloth, and now it's gone back to that again. So you, and the games you play can take whatever interpretation you want and no one can prove you wrong. Well, until some billionaire manages to clone dinoDNA and open a theme park.
I heard they are giving Pluto back too.
They basically imposed an arbitrary set of criteria of what qualifies as a "planet"... almost specifically so that Pluto wouldn't make the list.I get the feeling a lot of the people that complained about Pluto being reclassified as a dwarf planet would be the same type of people that would probably complain someday when they find 50 other Pluto like objects out there and be expected to memorize them because nobody can come up with a rational reason why Pluto is any more significant or special than the rest of them, and they would annoyed about how they would now have dozens of "planets".
They basically imposed an arbitrary set of criteria of what qualifies as a "planet"... almost specifically so that Pluto wouldn't make the list.
If we're imposing arbitrary rules, then we should just make one that says: If you weren't considered a planet at the time the original Sailor Moon aired, that you don't qualify as a full planet. Enjoy your dwarf planet status.
I would argue it would not be difficult to come up with a planet classification system that includes Pluto but excludes Eris and Sedna. And of course there are many that would have included Pluto along with the others. I assert that the line was drawn fairly arbitrarily, and it at least gave some consideration that Pluto wouldn't make it. Maybe there was someone who didn't like Hades, IDK. But hey, I'm not an astronomer, so feel free to explain why IAU chose that set of rules that resulted in that cut off. Pure Water freezes & Boils at certain temperatures, that's why they chose 0 & 100 degrees. There are objective reasons for these cutoffs. Why is "clearing the neighborhood" a criteria instead of something else that Pluto would qualify for? Like I said, I don't know, other than it being an arbitrary line.I don't think the group of the world's top astronomers had some conspiracy to single-handedly demote Pluto, or that what they came up with was just blindly arbitrary and they did it for the hell of it.
...They wanted it kept the way it was for sentimental nostalgic reasons and not because of logic or empirical evidence.