White Liberals and Politically Correct Racism

July 31, 2010
White Liberals and Politically Correct Racism
Edmund Standing

The white liberal is an unhealthy type of creature that you will undoubtedly have encountered, if not in real life, certainly via the media. By ‘liberal’, I do not mean simply someone who has a generally liberal outlook, in the sense of a ‘live and let live’ philosophy, nor do I mean liberals in the sense of the classical liberals of the conservative tradition. By ‘white liberal’, I mean a white Western individual who is likely to come from a middle class background and have a university education, considers him or herself to be both ‘left-wing’ and socially ‘liberal’, and almost certainly reads The Guardian or The Independent. White liberals espouse an artificial and pretentious form of ‘egalitarianism’, a patronising and hypocritical approach to ethnic minorities and non-Western cultures, and – in a re-hash of the notion of the ‘white man’s burden’ – devote themselves to a delusional Messianism in which they seek to ‘save the world’ through protesting against war (in real terms, protesting against non-white people having a chance at freedom and democracy), Israel (the one truly liberal society in the Middle East), globalisation (thereby opposing the one great vehicle by which poorer nations can develop), and so on, while making themselves feel and look ‘good’ by flaunting their pious support for campaigns to end poverty in the Third World (which will do no such thing, as Dambisa Moyo, Stephen Pollard, Marian L. Tupy, and others rightly point out ), and boasting about how ‘progressive’ they are by showing ‘solidarity’ with genocidal Islamists in Gaza.

White liberals, despite viewing themselves as intelligent and open-minded, are actually some of the most illiberal and narrow-minded people in society today. Their reactions to the idea that anyone might think differently to them range from gut-wrenching despair to pure hatred of the kind seen in the most fanatical of ‘true believers’. White liberals are, by and large, incapable of serious adult debate (preferring innuendo and accusations of bigotry), or of dealing with the fact that not everyone will agree with them (despite their supposed love of pluralism and a multiplicity of different ‘voices’), and tend to see any view which deviates from their cultic leftist script as a form of irredeemable moral evil. White liberals do not base their world-view on rational analysis and sensible argument, but instead on an almost religious faith that they possess the ‘truth’, and just as we see in so many fundamentalist religious cults and sects, the devotees of the white liberal faith burn with hatred for the ‘sin’ that surrounds them, and indeed, all too often for the ‘sinners’ themselves. White liberals, who are the intellectual equivalent of stroppy, rebellious teenagers, have sought to subvert and undermine Western civilisation, and some offer support for authoritarian and even terrorist movements as part of their attack on ‘racism’ and ‘colonialism’.

White liberals approach issues of race and racism from an essentially irrational, moralistic standpoint. White liberals do not simply judge racism to be based on bad thinking and criticise it for its illogical collectivism. Instead, white liberals make the issue of racism, as with other issues, all about them. White liberals have colonised the discourse of racism and anti-racism because it offers them an opportunity to boast of the superiority of their virtue and to demonstrate their purity and holiness through ostentatious and vacuous public displays of self-flagellation. Just as early Christianity imbued adherents with a deep sense of guilt and sinfulness, so the white liberal finds in reflecting on the history of white racism the opportunity to both revel in the guilt of the sinner and to make atonement through ‘anti-racist’ initiatives, thereby offering them the opportunity to further present themselves as a holy elite tasked with saving the world. And just as at various points in the history of Christianity an overarching sense of guilt derived from an intense awareness of, and obsession with, the supposedly inherent sinfulness of human beings and of the ‘world’ led ‘holy’ men and women to conclude that the path to holiness is found in the hatred of self, world, and the human condition, white liberals indulge in a form of self-hatred which is designed to project the image of penitence and sanctity, while actually being transparently pretentious, self-aggrandising, and destructive...

Full Article

All white liberals are racists... it says so right here in this article.
 
How many Liberal hating threads can you start in one day? It has to be a record.

Well I was going to go for the "How many conservative hating threads can you start in a day?" record... but that concept is pretty trite around here. Plus, breaking HellRaiser's Ripken-like record would be otherworldly.

Oh, and as a side note... how very vain and pretentious of you to capitalize the word "liberal."
 

Jagger69

Three lullabies in an ancient tongue
Well I was going to go for the "How many conservative hating threads can you start in a day?" record... but that concept is pretty trite around here. Plus, breaking HellRaiser's Ripken-like record would be otherworldly.

Oh, and as a side note... how very vain and pretentious of you to capitalize the word "liberal."

This whole campaign is obviously a shameless attempt on PlumpRump's behalf to pad his post count in a hurry so he can reach 2,000 posts. I'm wise to your shit, pal! :D
 
This whole campaign is obviously a shameless attempt on PlumpRump's behalf to pad his post count in a hurry so he can reach 2,000 posts. I'm wise to your shit, pal! :D

What?! No! I am driven by hate, and an ultimate disdain for those whose opinions differ, even slightly, from my own!

Wait... what is my post count at?
 
I disagree 1000 pct. with the racist contention...but I will say the majority of progressives (not liberals as the author erroneously asserts) are not as tolerant on a variety of perspectives as they see themselves.
 
"We tolerate everything... except intolerance. Oh, and smokers... dirty fucking smokers."
 
Well I was going to go for the "How many conservative hating threads can you start in a day?" record... but that concept is pretty trite around here. Plus, breaking HellRaiser's Ripken-like record would be otherworldly.

Oh, and as a side note... how very vain and pretentious of you to capitalize the word "liberal."

I would rep you again today if I could. :1orglaugh

:Note to self - owe PR rep:
 

Supafly

Retired Mod
Bronze Member
There is a lot of truth in that article, yet the adding of photos of described people making faces to further discredit them is unprofessional.

I have to admit that as one of those 'Liberals', I saw some things I need to think about
 
As an independent, somebody that tries to be objective in what he does and how he thinks, and somebody "without a dog in the fight" so to speak while both sides have a lot of faults and people that are embarrassments, the "liberals" as flawed as some of them are really are starting to come out ahead in the rationality and ethicalness departments. Of course maybe we should really say Republican and Democrat instead of conservative and liberal since the latter have become mostly meaningless labels that don't really fit either side anymore.

On a objective independent level I could also point out the extreme hilariousness of some of the examples given. Like the fact protesting against war would deprive non-white people the chance at freedom when pretty much very war fought for the last 50 years had nothing to do with freedom other than it being a thinly veiled rationalization for protecting our countries selfish self interest or maybe protecting ourselves from a situation that never harmed us or probably would have harmed us in the first place, at best. Maybe if some people were or are VERY lucky freedom might end up as some side effect of a war we have been in for our own needs.

Israel is far from perfect and a lot of people acknowledge it, just like some Americans are willing to acknowledge that the USA is far from perfect and has flaws and faults of it's own, even people that are patriotic. Somehow that's interpreted as siding against the "enemy" or allying with the Islamic nations surrounding it by some. What's really happening is people are calling a spade a spade when somebody does something wrong. I hear very few people, even liberal people, siding with Islamic extremist and totalitarian nations in the Middle East. I don't see a problem with not finding it a black and white situation (where one doesn't exist) where one side is totally right and the other totally wrong, nor do I fault people for not having an "either you're with us or you're with the enemy" mindset.

The person that wrote the article will also have to explain that globalization to me again. While nice in economic theoretical fairytale worlds that don't exist and never will created by politicians, the elite, financial engineers, businesses, and economist to try and shallowly justify their own actions it does nothing to help out the poor in the world, and it doesn't really help them "develop" either. It's a gigantic method of exploitation by people that do it because they can for their own profit, with businesses, and I'm sorry to say, a lot of the people in the USA being among the biggest exploiters because even the exploitation of their own countrymen isn't enough. At best it might allow a small percentage of them to make it so then they can then go about exploiting their own people along with us while the people doing the exploiting rationalize it by the meager amount of extra scraps that have been thrown to the poor by way of the new economic reality they are now in so the people that do the exploiting can feel better about making huge amounts of money off of back breaking, low paying, unsafe, unhealthy labor. Don't forget we pretty much rape their land for them so in the unlikely instance they do make it they will have nothing left. Don't forget also in the unlikely instance that they somehow advance a little and start demanding more that there will be a world out there, a almost inexhaustible supply, of even more impoverished people we can them dump them for and start over anew.

In the past humanity had a system called slavery. It was a system used because it gained huge amounts of profit off of cheap labor at the expense of human dignity, morality and ethicalness. Things quickly cast aside by too many people when it become inconvenient for them. People used many things to try and justify it, but in the end it was a vehicle of ruthless exploitation in the name of greed. I'm sure some of those people engaging in slavery even tried to rationalize that they were even making life better for the slave than it might have otherwise been no matter how inherently wrong it was. For the most part humanity got rid of slavery, but unfortunately little was done about it's selfishness, it's unquenchable need for profit, and the overwhelming force of nature called greed. Those never changed. Today to fit the need of people to profit in any way they can a new system has come about now called "globalization". It exploits human dignity, tosses aside morality and ethicalness in the name of profit and convenience like a past system did. It creates a system of back breaking, low paying, unsafe, unhealthy labor like a past system did. People that have to be the victim of it even don't really have a reasonable choice in the matter considering the whole starving in dying without money stuff if they don't work for somebody to extremely exploit somehow, just like past systems of exploitation where people had no choice.

"Globalization" has just become a form of modern day de facto slavery for the new world. It's slavery with a slightly new makeover. Wait though, there's more because now we have the wonderful invention of modern corporations. You know those things that have the ability to allow individual profit without individual responsibility and allow us to procure items without individual responsibility. The things that are so complex in the chain of resources you can't tell where anything comes from and are so ubiquitous and entrenched in our economic system that people practically have to use them. Now instead of the few slave masters of old holding the leaches of other people nearly all people of the developed world can take knowledge that they are doing their part doing that, often against what they would want. Others can try to console themselves that they are doing for the "benefit" of the ones that they exploit, as insane as that sounds. It just goes to show the depth of depravity people can achieve. We have a system that not only is inherently wrong, but now people have a means of fooling themselves into actually feeling good about it, and think the are acting decently. I don't really know if the Devil himself could have devised a more diabolical economic system if he wanted to.

Anyway, what do I know? I'm just a person that has opened my eyes up to reality and seen the world for what it is and cash aside all the crap that tries to blind people and let them make excuses for themselves. I might hate a lot of things about the world and our society but they’re reasons for it.
 
(I was going to add this in at the end but the 10 minute edit window got in the way while I was going over and checking my post.)

If there is something the article does have truth to it it's the fact that a lot of liberals ARE pretentious. A lot them like to talk about, even scream about what is wrong while not being willing to actually take the steps to correct those injustices, especially when it will demand sacrifices. I guess that’s better than the people that never acknowledge injustices at all or don’t care, but I do notice a lot of “liberals” can talk a good fight until it comes time do something, and I do think part of it’s because it makes them feel better or superior. In some ways that's only marginally better than many others' "don't give a crap about others at all" or their "only pretend to care when there's some benefit to me" philosophy, but at some point one needs the courage of their convictions, and to use more than just words to make them feel righteous. Action has to be placed with belief, and for no other reason than it's simply the right thing to do.
 

JayJohn85

Banned
Holy fuck you sure you shouldnt change your avatar to a confederate flag?


And them articles woah its awfully nice to see the right wing getting smart on their propaganda....Ahh refreshing from the usual drivel I must say!
 
I stopped reading after this:

The white liberal is an unhealthy type of creature

I could predict the rest of the article anyway. Based on fact? no. Informative? no. Soap box for someone who hates white liberal politics? yes.
 
Top