What's worse - fake tits or tattoos?

Which is worse?

  • Fake tits

    Votes: 12 50.0%
  • Tattoos

    Votes: 12 50.0%

  • Total voters
    24
Disclaimer: If you think these things can only ever improve a girl's body, this thread is not for you. But if you've ever had a favourite starlet who has 'ruined' her natural beauty with implants and/or ink, then welcome.

More and more girls in the world of porn have one or the other, if not both. I've seen people complain about each, but which is the bigger crime? Feel free to post before-and-after examples ;)

Personally, I think tattoos only ever ruin a girl. I've never seen ink on a body and thought it an improvement. On the other hand, while I prefer natural tits, I have seen some fakes that still look good.
 
Fake tits
 
tattoo's. I dont see anything beautiful about them at all.

Occasionally I've seen some fake tits that actually looked pretty good on a girl; (Sophie Dee, Shyla Stylez).
I've never seen a girl and thought "meh, she's ok, but if she had some ink all over her skin she'd be really hot!".
 
Yea I agree with mrtrebus I have no complaints about either one
 
how can I answer this? I prefer natural tits, but some fake tits are quite nice. then there are some small tattoos that I find cute, then there are ugly tattoos that covers the whole body.

I think my least favourite type of tattoos are wings that covers the back. hate it!
 
While it's very possible that a woman can have ugly/too many tats AND a nice pair of fake tits, the other combination is much more likely (nice tats and nasty (/too many- haha) fake tits)...

An artistic tattoo can accentuate a woman's natural beauty, and wouldn't be noticeable when caressing her in the dark (if you didn't think it was so nice to look at), whereas fake tits, yuck, I don't like the idea of having bags of saline or silicone in my hands - I'd prefer to avoid that as much as possible...
 
Top