Video Games and the Supreme Court

People started lining up at 5 a.m. today in front of the U.S. Supreme Court for a chance to hear arguments in a landmark case that will decide whether video games should be afforded First Amendment protection.

Among the more than 200 present were quite a few video game supporters. The rally and line-up to get in also included those on the side of California assemblyman Leland Yee, a ***** psychologist who wrote a bill in 2005 that would fine a retailer $1,000 for selling really violent games to ****. California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed it into law later that year.

Only 50 people are allowed into the court's gallery, according to the court's press office.

While we won't be hearing any decisions today we will likely gain insight into why the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court felt it was necessary to take on The State of California vs. The Entertainment Merchants Association and Entertainment Software Association as one of the relatively few cases they hear in a given year.

If you're a bit confused about why this is so important a case, read Totilo's excellent break down here.

The oral arguments wrap up at 11 a.m. eastern, our man on the ground and in the gallery, Stephen Totilo, will be filing a story summarizing the questions asked and answers given during the hearing.

Premium Link Upgrade

And another:

The United States Supreme Court hears its first ever case about video games this week. The stakes are high. Here's what is happening and why it's happening.

The United States Supreme Court is hearing that video game case this week, right? Right. The State of California vs. The Entertainment Merchants Association and Entertainment Software Association (aka "The Video Game Industry"). Oral arguments begin at the Supreme Court in front of Justices Roberts, Thomas, Kagan and the rest on Tuesday at 10am ET.

What's it about, again? Whether violent video games should be treated like pornography — in other words, whether there can be a type of violent video game that would be legal to sell to adults but ******* to sell to ****.

Oh, like R-rated movies? No, not like R-rated movies. It's legal in the United States for a *** to go see an R-rated movie, even if it's against the rules set forth by the movie industry. The only kind of movies that are ******* for **** to see are obscene ones (they're ******* for anyone to sell to anyone of any age). Those movies would fall under a special category defined by the Supreme Court in the late 60s for certain kinds of sexual material. California wants violent video games to be treated like that extreme sexual content, something no violent movies, books or magazines are subject to.

Read more here:

Premium Link Upgrade

Premium Image Content
Upgrade to Premium to view all images in this thread
 

Premium Content

This thread contains exclusive content for our premium community members.

What you're missing:
  • Full discussion and replies
  • Community interaction and voting
Already have an account?
✨ Unlock exclusive discussions and premium features
Premium Benefits:
Exclusive content • Priority support • Advanced features • Full thread access
Top