Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="The Identifier" data-source="post: 11741878" data-attributes="member: 804023">OK. I will accept it as a tag which presumably will be an acceptable compromise as it will enable it to show up in title search results on this forum if it will indeed be the difference tween someone finding her and not, but I think putting an alternative form of the same thing in the title itself is not necessary and I will always favor less than more when it comes to titles; particularly when this is a semi-manufactured name for want of a better term.But just to give you an insight into my thoughts:&quot;You may be called McDonald's but we're gonna call you Mc Donald's&quot;&quot;You may be called Burger King but we're gonna call you BurgerKing&quot;&quot;You may be called WhatsApp but we're gonna call you Whats App&quot;...and so on. You know... a name is a name. If their name was Freya Q on the StasyQ site then I wouldn't question it and you wouldn't then want &quot;FreyaQ&quot; to also be added as an alias, either.Other websites may have their own policies and ways of about going things which is fair enough but I don't see why we should follow suit or cater for each and every one, particularly when it is what I perceive to be absolutely wrong based on the original source of information.indexxx for example are only doing it their way and nobody elses... so where's their regard for other people's practices? ... especially the ones who created the name in the first place! As much as I don't like how StasyQ go about things by plonking Q on the end of names - I think they are the only website we should be paying attention to as they are the ones who came up with it and listing babes as one string of text is the path they have chosen.So I completely understand that you are looking at things from a &quot;doing things that need to be done in order to be found&quot; perspective but I can't but help but look upon it as &quot;right&quot; and &quot;wrong&quot;.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="The Identifier, post: 11741878, member: 804023"] OK. I will accept it as a tag which presumably will be an acceptable compromise as it will enable it to show up in title search results on this forum if it will indeed be the difference tween someone finding her and not, but I think putting an alternative form of the same thing in the title itself is not necessary and I will always favor less than more when it comes to titles; particularly when this is a semi-manufactured name for want of a better term. But just to give you an insight into my thoughts: [I]"You may be called McDonald's but we're gonna call you Mc Donald's" "You may be called Burger King but we're gonna call you BurgerKing" "You may be called WhatsApp but we're gonna call you Whats App"[/I] ...and so on. You know... a name is a name. If their name was Freya Q on the StasyQ site then I wouldn't question it and you wouldn't then want "FreyaQ" to also be added as an alias, either. Other websites may have their own policies and ways of about going things which is fair enough but I don't see why we should follow suit or cater for each and every one, particularly when it is what I perceive to be absolutely wrong based on the original source of information. indexxx for example are only doing it their way and nobody elses... so where's their regard for other people's practices? ... especially the ones who created the name in the first place! As much as I don't like how StasyQ go about things by plonking Q on the end of names - I think they are the only website we should be paying attention to as they are the ones who came up with it and listing babes as one string of text is the path they have chosen. So I completely understand that you are looking at things from a "doing things that need to be done in order to be found" perspective but I can't but help but look upon it as "right" and "wrong". [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

What color is a yellow rose?