The world would be better if women ran it.

[vodkazvictim]

I know. I'm gonna get kicked off FO for this. But think:
No war. All that money invested in more worthy causes. Instead of war, fashion shows. The result is that Italy is the worlds premier superpower. As a result everyone worldwide enjoys Italian food rather than crappy macdonalds.

A limit placed on how drunk guys can get so that they don't letch on girls would result in no drunk driving and no drunken violence.

 

[GregCentauro]

Vote Sarah Palin in 2012!

 

[tunsty]

NO WAR???

Have you ever seen women at a January clothes sale?

 

[Ulysses31]

I see your point but the women that you see in politics like Margaret Thatcher and Sarah Palin are pretty much like men in their thinking. We need to get a camp gay man at the top that acts like a stereotypical woman.

 

[PlasmaTwa2]

I hate when people say there would be no war if women ran the world. Have you ever seen teenage girls?

"Hey, this is England. Why are you invading me?"

"Oh, I think you know why!"

 

[Hot Mega]

OP never heard of PMS nor watched an episode of Oprah.

 

[Trident1]

Have you ever seen how mean and bitchy Liberal/Leftist women are? It's like they're always pissed off at something. Like they didn't win the genetic lottery.

 

[mr. jizz]

I don't like this idea of women running the world, it means they'll be out of the kitchen...jk... I kid, I kid.

 

[vodkazvictim]

My point on the military stands:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLJ8ILIE780

 

[lurkingdirk]

If you think the world would be better if women ran it, you've clearly never seen the view.

 

[roronoa3000]

There would be a war the second week of every month.

 

[BlueBalls]

If we were to speculate about some parallel universe where women instead of men - during the growth of our species into a more sociable and state oriented population - found themselves becoming the dominant sex within the species where their values, morals and social practises were the focal point upon which public policy was set there might have been a slight difference as to how global politics would be run today. But you never know, we all know males are the far more aggressive sex it's within our nature to clash with one another over certain things and that surely was to influence our political actions as history has shown. But who's to say that the social and political situation those in power were in at the time didn't have some influence in the moulding of the modern political mind, male or female? Political evolution, if you will...

In discussing the here and now of the political - historically patriarchal - environment; you have to say that even if all major economic nations were to go through a stage of elections upon which they all ended up being run by women I still don't see how there would be much difference in the way they would be run or how the policy they would wish to put in place to further their political cause would really change all that much. Women have and do garner biases, dislikes and perversions just like men and they're just as willing to be lead by one of these things and they're just as likely to make poor, aggressive or self serving decisions whether they think it's for the greater good or not - especially in our modern political environment. The male psyche has been fully fixed to the position of power, even within the current system it must be said that female politicians are looked at and judged in a certain way. They have to act within a certain framework which while keeping some semblance of their femininity they still must project male attributes in order to promote that strength both physical and ideological that is so needed in political leadership. There's just no way of getting away from that.

I dunno if this makes sense? I'm pretty drunk right now.

 

[316sherm]

 

[Johan]

In a world run by women, we would be thinking it would be tter if men were in control...

 

[Vlad The Impaler]

Women are insane and wholly untrustworthy. They're a hundred times more deceptive, conniving and manipulative than men are. Have you ever seen Snapped or Deadly Women?

 

[vodkazvictim]

If we were to speculate about some parallel universe where women instead of men - during the growth of our species into a more sociable and state oriented population - found themselves becoming the dominant sex within the species where their values, morals and social practises were the focal point upon which public policy was set there might have been a slight difference as to how global politics would be run today. But you never know, we all know males are the far more aggressive sex it's within our nature to clash with one another over certain things and that surely was to influence our political actions as history has shown. But who's to say that the social and political situation those in power were in at the time didn't have some influence in the moulding of the modern political mind, male or female? Political evolution, if you will...

In discussing the here and now of the political - historically patriarchal - environment; you have to say that even if all major economic nations were to go through a stage of elections upon which they all ended up being run by women I still don't see how there would be much difference in the way they would be run or how the policy they would wish to put in place to further their political cause would really change all that much. Women have and do garner biases, dislikes and perversions just like men and they're just as willing to be lead by one of these things and they're just as likely to make poor, aggressive or self serving decisions whether they think it's for the greater good or not - especially in our modern political environment. The male psyche has been fully fixed to the position of power, even within the current system it must be said that female politicians are looked at and judged in a certain way. They have to act within a certain framework which while keeping some semblance of their femininity they still must project male attributes in order to promote that strength both physical and ideological that is so needed in political leadership. There's just no way of getting away from that.

I dunno if this makes sense? I'm pretty drunk right now.

That is the first time I've ever seen you do anything remotely serious or write anything that comes remotely close to sense.
Go get your stomach pumped.

 

[garyclone]

What? I thought women secretly ran the world already.

 

[D-rock]

I know. I'm gonna get kicked off FO for this. But think:
No war. All that money invested in more worthy causes.

Why would you believe this to every be so? I don't thing things like greed and lust for power are any less in women than they are in men. The only reason they haven't caused them like men have is because they haven't been in positions of power as long to do so. I think the only things that would change would be different looking faces of people that caused war and acquired power and money for themselves.

 

[ManifestDestiny]

Women are insane and wholly untrustworthy. They're a hundred times more deceptive, conniving and manipulative than men are. Have you ever seen Snapped or Deadly Women?

true. cant live with em, cant live without em.

men are from mars, women are from venus. lol

 

[AlexanderAvery]

I know. I'm gonna get kicked off FO for this. But think:
No war. All that money invested in more worthy causes. Instead of war, fashion shows. The result is that Italy is the worlds premier superpower. As a result everyone worldwide enjoys Italian food rather than crappy macdonalds.

A limit placed on how drunk guys can get so that they don't letch on girls would result in no drunk driving and no drunken violence.

No war? Ever heard of the Huns, or the Spartians. Both of those nations were run by women. Men were only really a military force there. Two of the most warlike nations-states ever. Just saying.