'The Decision' ESPN Will Come to Regret; ESPN 'Guilty of Hype'

I've long been done with ESPN. In fact, I've been done with them since NHL2nite left (although it's not about their lack of hockey coverage for me, per se). They are more about the characters they peddle than they are about sports. They are all about entertainment and they really hold no weight with me anymore. I can't remember the last time I watched SportCenter from beginning to end, but has to be close to at least 6 years. I've had it with them and their enormous ego's. This article asserts that the LeBron "decision" show was a farce; it was a disgrace to the network and leans closer to "real life" drama than it does respectable newsgathering.

Once upon a time, the letters in ESPN stood for Entertainment Sports Programming Network. The channel officially went with just the letters years ago, but every so often, it's instructive for viewers to remember that fact, because apparently some people inside the Bristol, Conn., headquarters have never forgotten the entertainment or programming part of the acronym.

Thursday's airing of LeBron James' announcement of the Miami Heat as his team of choice was just the latest example of how the E and P increasingly trump the S at ESPN.

The needle on the meter of the hype machine started in the red at 9 p.m. EDT, the minute "The Decision" began, when some disembodied voice declared James to be the most significant free agent in NBA history.

That needle stayed pinned to the red and extended even into the commercials when the second ad of the hour was for a flavored water homage to James, with references to the momentous choice that was coming.
No promotional/hype stone was left unturned, even down to a "Breaking News" ticker that declared in the commercial break right before the announcement was made that James was on stage to make the announcement.

And while Norby Williamson, ESPN's executive vice president of production, pledged that James would make his announcement in the first 10-15 minutes, the choice wasn't revealed until 9:27, all the better for the channel to run promos for its World Cup and Home Run Derby coverage.

When the moment finally arrived, Jim Gray, James' handpicked interviewer, appeared hell bent on extending his own 15 minutes in the limelight.

Gray admitted on Dan Patrick's Fox Sports Radio show that he set the wheels of Thursday's monstrosity in motion by approaching James' friend and marketing advisor Maverick Carter during Game 2 of the NBA Finals and proposing a one-hour show for James' announcement -- with him as interviewer.

And Gray, who hasn't been this relevant since he made Pete Rose sympathetic by trying to get him to confess to betting on baseball before Game 2 of the 1999 World Series, dragged out his moment in the sun, asking 16 questions of James before finally getting around to the only two anyone was interested in -- namely, Who and Why?

The sycophantic Stuart Scott, a most unfortunate choice to host the evening, demonstrated his worth to the proceedings with his first question to James: "What text message that you've received since you made your announcement has impacted you the most?"

Thanks, Stu.

The hour didn't completely tarnish all the ESPN talent. Analyst Jon Barry's reference to NBA reporter Chris Broussard as "Clarence Beeks," from the Dan Aykroyd-Eddie Murphy movie Trading Places, was a laugh-out-loud moment. And Michael Wilbon was spot-on in his vigorous questioning of James after the decision was announced.

All in all, the Worldwide Leader took what should have been a 10- or 15-minute exercise at most and turned it into a six-hour marathon, counting the SportsCenters on either side.

In the process, ESPN trampled over the twin ideas of context and solid journalism, all in the name of hopefully drawing a big audience.

It didn't seem to matter to ESPN President George Bodenheimer that handing over an hour of programming and advertising revenue to James, a person that the news division at ESPN has to cover when this was all over, sets a horrible precedent. All that was important was getting eyeballs in front of the television or computer screen, or ears in front of the radio.

Bodenheimer and the rest of the executive coterie at ESPN can attempt to assuage themselves about the harm they've done to the reputation of the newsgathering operation in Bristol by saying that James was turning over the night's proceeds to charity and that its producers were in control of the evening.

No self-respecting newsgathering organization ever lets the subject take control of an interview, even if a charity as noble as the Boys and Girls Clubs of America, is a beneficiary. And you thought the Brothers Grimm could spin fairy tales.

No, ESPN lost control of things last Friday when Carter, James' right hand man and the CEO of his marketing company, approached network executives about a one-hour show to announce where James would play.

Instead of laughing Carter and James off the phone, ESPN officials gave them the green light. But it didn't stop there. They let James dictate how the evening would play out, even down to where the interview would take place and who would do it.

No self-respecting newsgathering organization ever lets the subject take control of an interview, even if a charity as noble as the Boys and Girls Clubs of America is a beneficiary.

Hardly anyone associated with Thursday's journey into wretched excess should walk out of it feeling clean. And worse yet, ESPN has almost certainly set a precedent that if the subject is big enough and the topic is important enough, entertainment and programming will always come first over sports and journalism.

There's just one more question left from Thursday: What time does the Brett Favre show start?

http://nba.fanhouse.com/2010/07/08/...07/08/the-decision-is-in-espn-guilty-of-hype/

And the McDonalds ad they also ran. So LeBron was all about making dollars with this little spiel. The NBA fans and other lemmings who bought into this are simpletons, plain and simple. :D
 

StanScratch

My Penis Is Dancing!
I think I've watched ESPN for two hours since the MLB Network hit the air. Since then, ESPN has absolutely no use for me.
 

LukeEl

I am a failure to the Korean side of my family
I still fall asleep sometimes with Sportscenter on, so ESPN does serve a purpose for me.
 
ESPN is an absolute joke nowadays in regard to their coverage of about 98% of sports. All but 2-3 of the analysts they regularly feature are nothing short of horrid.
 

PlasmaTwa2

The Second-Hottest Man in my Mother's Basement
We don't get ESPN up here. We have TSN, which is pretty much ESPN-lite, but at least they usually are showing sports or something Maple Leaf-related.
 

LukeEl

I am a failure to the Korean side of my family
Don Cherry's suits are better than ESPN these days.
 
Who gives a shit!?

Just watch ESPN for the highlights and the news updates. What more from a sports news channel do you want? :dunno:
 
We don't get ESPN up here. We have TSN, which is pretty much ESPN-lite, but at least they usually are showing sports or something Maple Leaf-related.

TSN. :1orglaugh

12:00 Maple Leaf/Canuck Coverage (depending on where you live)
12:30 Blue Jay Coverage
12:45 The rest of NHL highlights
1:30 Raptors clip.
1:35 Segment on NHL franchise relocation to Canada.
2:00 The rest of the MLB highlights.
2:30 NHL free agent trade discussion with expert panel.
3:00 Poker
4:00 The rest of the sports world.

Note - Once the NFL season starts, they slip that in somewhere between franchise relocation discussion and MLB highlights.

The NBA finals took a backseat to regular season Blue Jays games and fucking poker. :crash:
 
Who gives a shit!?

Just watch ESPN for the highlights and the news updates. What more from a sports news channel do you want? :dunno:

I haven't been able to "just watch the highlights" in damn near a decade. Every show they have on features some sort of analysis every 5 fucking minutes. Instead of what happened, I'd have to listen to 15 minutes of John Kruk and Eduardo Perez suck the Yankees and Red Sox collective cock. If they had a show of strictly highlights, I'd be hooked, but that show as it is, does not exist.
 

Ace Bandage

The one and only.
Who told Josh Elliot that he should infuse his own opinions into the highlights? Just show the clips and tell me what happened. I don't need your analysis and thoughts as well. He almost makes SportsCenter unwatchable at times. I'm also not a fan of the female anchors. Hannah Storm and Sage Steele should be making sandwiches not covering sports.
 
I haven't been able to "just watch the highlights" in damn near a decade. Every show they have on features some sort of analysis every 5 fucking minutes. Instead of what happened, I'd have to listen to 15 minutes of John Kruk and Eduardo Perez suck the Yankees and Red Sox collective cock. If they had a show of strictly highlights, I'd be hooked, but that show as it is, does not exist.

ESPNEWS? :dunno:
 
ESPN is an absolute joke nowadays in regard to their coverage of about 98% of sports. All but 2-3 of the analysts they regularly feature are nothing short of horrid.

Before they first start the analysts must be forced to sign contracts stating they are not to use pertinent facts that truly show how well a team or individual is doing, well thought out reasoning, or rational analysis. They must also over hype everything they are involved with.
 
I've long been done with ESPN. In fact, I've been done with them since NHL2nite left (although it's not about their lack of hockey coverage for me, per se). They are more about the characters they peddle than they are about sports. They are all about entertainment and they really hold no weight with me anymore. I can't remember the last time I watched SportCenter from beginning to end, but has to be close to at least 6 years. I've had it with them and their enormous ego's. This article asserts that the LeBron "decision" show was a farce; it was a disgrace to the network and leans closer to "real life" drama than it does respectable newsgathering.

And the McDonalds ad they also ran. So LeBron was all about making dollars with this little spiel. The NBA fans and other lemmings who bought into this are simpletons, plain and simple. :D

Couldn't agree with this post more if I had written it myself. ESPN is an absolute joke, they cover what they want to cover, when they want to cover it, and have become one of the most sensationalist entities on tv. In essence, they tell the viewer what is important, whom to care about, how long to care, and to what degree. They have a monopoly on "sports coverage," so the simple "change the channel" response from people who refuse to understand the situation doesn't apply if one wants to see sports "highlights."

I always, this year especially, use the analogy of the San Diego Padres. They are my home team, so of course I would like to see more coverage of them across the board, but usually it just doesn't make sense to mention the Padres in more than passing because for the last few years they have been perennial let downs not worth extended consideration. However, this year, the Padres have been in 1st place in the NL west for the majority of the season, are tied with the Braves for the best record in the NL, and have the best all-around pitching staff in the MLB. Not to mention specific players such as Mat Latos, Heath Bell, Adrian Gonzalez, Luke Gregorson and Mike Adams that are among the game's best individual performers that hardly ever get mentioned. Look up each of those players numbers, and you'll be pretty surprised at how well these players have fared in their respective positions/roles compared to the annointed "others" that ESPN chooses to bestow coverage upon. The casual fan has never even heard of 3 of the 5 players I've mentioned here, and all of them are All-Star caliber players. (I'm not saying that all of them should be All-Stars, but in comparison to a handful of the players that are this year, they deserve more serious consideration than they got.)

I understand the the Padres' style of play is solid pitching and solid defense coupled with timely hitting, and to most, that is not the sexiest combination of factors for a baseball team to have, nonetheless the Padres are 15 games over .500 (50-35) and are having an unbelieveable season and IMO deserve a lot more credit and respect than ESPN has deemed they are worthy of. In perspective, considering the way that the Padres have been playing over the course of the season, they have been completely shafted by ESPN for the likes of team such as the Dodgers (47-38), the Cubs (38-48), the Phillies (44-40) etc... teams that have not been playing nearly as well as the Padres, but have "sexier" players and more drama to hype. Even the Washington Nationals (38-48) have received more attention this season.

Granted Strasburg is a phenomenal player, and will be for years to come, but even before Strasburg was a major leaguer the hype surrounding him as far "when/where/etc." will he make his MLB debut was far bigger "news" in the eyes of ESPN than anything that was actually happening at the major league level. Disgusting. And with respect to Strasburg, he has done well, yes, but ESPN has done no justice to other rookie pitchers that have already made a more pronounced and direct impact on their team's performance on the field. Take Mike Leake from the Reds as an example. One of a very, very small number of individuals to start in the majors without ever having thrown a single pitch in the minors is news enough in my mind, but Leake, in 16 starts this season has accumulated a record of 6-1, with an ERA of 3.38, close to 70 strikeouts (without "dominant" stuff) and has become the staff ace of the "lowly" Reds who are currently atop the NL central (49-38) and currently hold a 3.0 game lead over the trailing Cardinals, and a 10.5 game lead over the 3rd place Cubs. Far more impressive, IMO, than Strasburg winning a few games for a less than averagre Nationals team that sports the 3rd worst record in the NL.

ESPN is a joke, but there remain few alternatives, especially on television. That's why I choose to get my sports from the individual sports channels themselves (i.e. MLB tv, NBA tv, NFL tv, etc...) as ESPN has turned into nothing more than the sports equivalent of the Jerry Springer show, interested more in sensationalism than actual news. But seeing as how not everyone has X tv options, they remain consigned to the dreck that is ESPN.
 

PlasmaTwa2

The Second-Hottest Man in my Mother's Basement
TSN. :1orglaugh

12:00 Maple Leaf/Canuck Coverage (depending on where you live)
12:30 Blue Jay Coverage
12:45 The rest of NHL highlights
1:30 Raptors clip.
1:35 Segment on NHL franchise relocation to Canada.
2:00 The rest of the MLB highlights.
2:30 NHL free agent trade discussion with expert panel.
3:00 Poker
4:00 The rest of the sports world.

Note - Once the NFL season starts, they slip that in somewhere between franchise relocation discussion and MLB highlights.

The NBA finals took a backseat to regular season Blue Jays games and fucking poker. :crash:

I live in the West and there is no Canucks coverage where I live. :dunno:
 

PlasmaTwa2

The Second-Hottest Man in my Mother's Basement
I'm thinking of Sportsnet. Vancouver all day.

That makes sense, cause they signed a deal with Rogers that included the arena name. But there's four Sportsnets, isn't there? All I get stuck with is fucking Calgary/Edmonton news. Oh, both teams need to rebuild? Derp.
 
ESPNEWS? :dunno:

You know what, I just turned that on after reading your suggestion, and in this 30 minute episode, they've: Talked about the Heat for a total of 15 minutes (spaced out), showed about 8 minutes of highlights, (minus the 3 minutes of reaction to the Cliff Lee trade) and the rest was commercials. More than half the time they were talking about the Heat, it was the same stock footage of LeBron, Wade, and Bosh making their entrance, while Shelly Smith, Chris Brussard, and Tim Legler all said the exact same fucking thing. Highlights were the vast minority of that program.

Before they first start the analysts must be forced to sign contracts stating they are not to use pertinent facts that truly show how well a team or individual is doing, well thought out reasoning, or rational analysis. They must also over hype everything they are involved with.

But wait! You forgot the fact that they should all say the same thing! ;)
 
Top