Texas executes man for double murder eventhough another con confessed to the killings

Law would only make sense if the guy who did shoot them also faces the death penalty but he's not

Texas executes prisoner for double murder even though another con confessed to the killings


A man who was convicted for his involvement in the slayings of two people in north Texas was executed on Tuesday, even though an alleged accomplice admitted to the killings.

Steven Michael Woods, 31, was convicted in the shooting and slashing of a young Dallas-area couple under a controversial Texas law that allows a defendant to be put to death for a murder someone else committed.

Woods was given a lethal injection of drugs and pronounced dead at 6.22pm local time, said Michelle Lyons, a Texas Department of Criminal Justice spokeswoman.

article-0-0DE0F65A00000578-973_468x452.jpg

Executed on Tuesday: Steven Michael Woods, pictured earlier this month, was sentenced to death under a highly controversial Texas law


In his last words, Woods told his mother he loved her, accused the state of committing a murder, and named his co-defendant, Marcus Rhodes, who pleaded guilty to murdering the couple and is serving a life sentence.

'You're not about to witness an execution. You are about to witness a murder.

'I am strapped down for something Marcus Rhodes did. I never killed nobody, ever,' he said.

'Justice has let me down. Somebody completely screwed this up.

'Well, Warden, if you're going to murder someone, go ahead and do it. Pull that trigger.'

For his last meal, Woods requested bacon; a large pizza with bacon, sausage, pepperoni and hamburger; fried chicken breasts; chicken fried steak; hamburgers with bacon on French toast; garlic bread sticks; Mountain Dew, Pepsi, root beer and sweet tea; and ice cream.

His was the 10th execution in Texas this year and the 33rd in the country, Reuters reports.

Woods was convicted of capital murder in 2002 after a jury found him guilty in the slayings of Ronald Whitehead, 21, and Bethena Brosz, 19, in The Colony, Texas, just outside Dallas.

When passersby found their bodies, they had both been shot in the head and their throats cut, according to a report by Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott's office.

Woods told police that he and a friend were with the victims the night before they were found, hanging out in the Deep Ellum entertainment district in Dallas, and had agreed to take them to a house in the Colony, the report said.

Their cars became separated, and Woods and his friend, Marcus Rhodes, went back to Deep Ellum, Woods told police, according to the report.

The victims' belongings were later discovered in Rhodes' car, and Rhodes was arrested, the report said.

Woods fled the area and was later arrested in California.

Witnesses told police that Woods had bragged about killing the pair and said before their deaths that he planned to kill them, according to the report.

Rhodes pleaded guilty to killing the two, but Woods has maintained his innocence during his trial, in online posts and in media interviews.

On a Facebook page maintained by supporters, Woods said he was present for the killings but did not know they were going to happen and fled because he feared Rhodes would kill him, too.

But the jury, apparently convinced of his involvement on some level, was able to convict him using the state's law of parties, an attorney general spokesman said.

The law allows a jury to find a defendant guilty of murder if they were involved in the crime, even if they did not directly commit the killing, or were involved in crimes that lead to the killing, or if they should have known the crime would happen and showed a 'reckless disregard' for human life.

Woods maintains that all he did was witnesses a horrible crime, and then run for his life, but that the law he has called 'barbaric' in web postings punished him for a crime he did not commit.

Witnesses who said he told them he had killed the pair were lying, he has said.

'Imagine waking up every day in a hot humid cell, knowing that you didn't do anything to find yourself there,' reads his posting on a Facebook page.

'Knowing that so many people know that they got the wrong person, but no one wants to waste their time fighting for you.'

Death penalty advocates argued that people who help plan murders, or who are involved in actions leading up to it, are just as guilty as those who pull the trigger.

'We hold people responsible for being conspirators or assisting even in good acts,' said Dudley Sharp, a victims-rights advocate in Houston.

'We are not treating murderers any different than we would by giving a Nobel Prize to someone who began research 40 years ago even though they didn't make the breakthrough.'

During the penalty phase of the trial, jurors were told that Woods was involved in the homicide of another victim in California before the killings of Brosz and Whitehead, something Woods denies in online postings.

Texas has the country's most active death row, executing more than four times as many people as any other state since the death penalty was reinstated in the United States in 1976, according to the Death Penalty Information Center.

A second execution is scheduled in Texas for Thursday. Duane Buck was convicted in 1997 for the shooting deaths of two people in Harris County. Two more are planned for next week.

article-0-0DE0F55E00000578-148_233x339.jpg

Lethal injection: Steven Michael Woods, seen after his arrest nearly ten years ago, said right up until his death that he did not murder anyone


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-murder-confessed-killings.html#ixzz1XuQl6nvD
 

LukeEl

I am a failure to the Korean side of my family
Re: Texas executes man for double murder eventhough another con confessed to the kill

This wouldn't be the first time someone was wrongly executed.
 

Spleen

Banned?
Re: Texas executes man for double murder eventhough another con confessed to the kill

He fucking loved bacon.
 
Re: Texas executes man for double murder eventhough another con confessed to the kill

It is not without reason texas is called the death penalty state, errors and shit happen sadly.
 
Re: Texas executes man for double murder eventhough another con confessed to the kill

It is not without reason texas is called the death penalty state, errors and shit happen sadly.
It's not an error though, it's actually part of the law. He was given the death penalty because authorities think he was somehow involved in the murders yet the guy who admitted to killing them escapes the death penalty because of a plea deal, in my opinion if the guy who pulled the trigger doesn't face execution then neither should any accomplices.
 

Mayhem

Banned
Re: Texas executes man for double murder eventhough another con confessed to the kill

'Well, Warden, if you're going to murder someone, go ahead and do it. Pull that trigger.'

Maybe yes, maybe no. But at least the fucker went down swingin'.
 

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
Re: Texas executes man for double murder eventhough another con confessed to the kill

I believe the law says something like that if you are involved in a crime and a murder takes place during the act you are also guilty of the murder.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Parties
So if you an another rob a store and your accomplice murders the clerk, you are also guilty of murder, depending on how the DA wants to handle it.

I don't agree with that law at all.
There are too many circumstances where it could be a mistake, taken entirely out of context.
For example what if you just entered a store with a friend, next thing you know he shoots the clerk.
All you wanted was a Slim Jim and a Super Big Gulp, but the law can charge you with murder in that circumstance.
Or maybe you did want to rob the place, but you had no intention of physically harming anyone.
http://saveaninnocentlife.net/Home.php

I don't know, but it seems to me that there was not only not enough evidence to convict him of anything but execute him?
Don't seem right.
 
Re: Texas executes man for double murder eventhough another con confessed to the kill

I don't believe a person albeit an accomplice should be put to death if they did not commit the act of murdering the victim(s).

A law saying you were there and that's good enough isn't good enough IMO.

Although, I can see the logic of the....well, no I can't. I can see what Texas seems to by trying to do...get one guy to flip on the other to avoid certain death.

But the state shouldn't be executing someone unless there is a certainty that the individual actually committed the act of taking someone's life.

Being there and actually committing the act are not close enough to condemn someone to death.

For the state to execute someone when there is a reasonable certainty the person didn't actually commit the act is tantamount to state sponsored murder IMO.
 
Re: Texas executes man for double murder eventhough another con confessed to the kill

I don't believe a person albeit an accomplice should be put to death if they did not commit the act of murdering the victim(s).

A law saying you were there and that's good enough isn't good enough IMO.

Although, I can see the logic of the....well, no I can't. I can see what Texas seems to by trying to do...get one guy to flip on the other to avoid certain death.

But the state shouldn't be executing someone unless there is a certainty that the individual actually committed the act of taking someone's life.

Being there and actually committing the act are not close enough to condemn someone to death.

For the state to execute someone when there is a reasonable certainty the person didn't actually commit the act is tantamount to state sponsored murder IMO.

This may be a first. I agree with EVERY word of what you said. Every one. That law makes less than no sense...however, I don't believe in capital punishment at all, so I am biased.

I think I'm just more amazed that I agree with everything you said Mega. What the fuck...temp must droppin' in hell...;)
 
Re: Texas executes man for double murder eventhough another con confessed to the kill



I think I'm just more amazed that I agree with everything you said Mega. What the fuck...temp must droppin' in hell...;)

Hath frozen... Don't worry....you should feel 'right as rain' in a few.
 
Re: Texas executes man for double murder eventhough another con confessed to the kill


^^See. I told you and you didn't even see it coming.;)
 
Re: Texas executes man for double murder eventhough another con confessed to the kill

The standard of proof doesn't seem very strong in this case, and it seems the whole law of parties concept is a way to do an end around on something that would be much harder to prove otherwise.
 

Ace Boobtoucher

Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
Re: Texas executes man for double murder eventhough another con confessed to the kill

Guilt by association? Works for me.
 
Re: Texas executes man for double murder eventhough another con confessed to the kill

Mother of slain police officer says execution of his 'killer' will bring her peace... as 2,000 protesters march through streets of Georgia

* Troy Davis set to be executed by lethal injection next Wednesday
* Convicted of killing police officer Mark MacPhail in Georgia in 1989
* More than 2,000 activists march claiming he was wrongly convicted
* But Mr MacPhail’s mother says she is still convinced Davis is guilty


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...Georgia-killer-bring-peace.html#ixzz1YGq4AYcU
 
Re: Texas executes man for double murder eventhough another con confessed to the kill

'I'm innocent. I didn't kill your son': Troy Davis' last words to family in execution chamber before he is finally put to death

* Even on his death bed Davis maintained he was innocent
* Prisoner told MacPhail family to 'dig deeper and find the truth'
* Defence lawyer calls death 'a legalised lynching' and described execution as 'more macabre and horrible than anything on film or television'
* Davis declared dead at 11.08pm
* Last ditch appeal had challenged ballistics linking Davis to the crime, and eyewitness testimony identifying Davis as the killer
* UN officials had also appealed for a reprieve
* All nine Supreme Court justices voted to uphold the execution after taking more than four hours to come to their decision
* Davis convicted of killing off duty police officer Mark MacPhail in 1989


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...cution-chamber-Im-innocent.html#ixzz1Yf9AEyHb


Mother of slain police officer says execution of his 'killer' will bring her peace... as 2,000 protesters march through streets of Georgia

* Troy Davis set to be executed by lethal injection next Wednesday
* Convicted of killing police officer Mark MacPhail in Georgia in 1989
* More than 2,000 activists march claiming he was wrongly convicted
* But Mr MacPhail’s mother says she is still convinced Davis is guilty


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...Georgia-killer-bring-peace.html#ixzz1YGq4AYcU
 
Top