It is good that the press has announced that they are children because otherwise someone might think that they are adult age Arab terrorists.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...d-conflict-REFUSE-carry-intrusive-checks.html
Syrian children arrived in England
- Thread starter assari
- Start date
It is good that the press has announced that they are children because otherwise someone might think that they are adult age Arab terrorists.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...d-conflict-REFUSE-carry-intrusive-checks.html
Rock a bye baby...
I feel sorry for England. I have relatives there and many personal friends. From what I've been told England ain't too far from being a muslim country. All the refugees I have seen in pictures here in the states of the refugees we took have been men. Where are the women and children? I wouldn't take any men if I had a say.
meesterperfect
Hiliary 2020
Fact: Almost all the refugees from Arab and African countries are refugees because the US and Nato destroyed their countries.
Fact: Most of these countries are now controlled either partly or wholly by mercenary "terrorist" groups. They have all been turned into living hell for their people.
Fact: The EU unelected and elected "leaders" are the ones promoting and organizing the mass immigration into Europe.
Do you see a pattern here?
Do you still think all this was not part of a plan?
Fact: Most of the "refugees" are young men.
Shouldn't they mostly be women and children?
There is no doubt that among all these millions of young male refugees flooding Europe at least some are from these mercenary terrorist armies which are all offshoots of the Muslim Brotherhood.
There is no doubt that they are being placed in Europe intentionally.
What a great scheme. Bomb the hell out of these countries and destroy them in every way possible.
Kill their leaders and install puppet leaders in their place.
Create, fund and arm armies of mercenaries to take control of these countries and then claim they are the enemy you are fighting.
Organize and fund mass immigration of mostly young men from these countries to enter Europe and create chaos there.
Destroy European culture and society.
USA is next.
That is exactly what is happening.
Fact: Most of these countries are now controlled either partly or wholly by mercenary "terrorist" groups. They have all been turned into living hell for their people.
Fact: The EU unelected and elected "leaders" are the ones promoting and organizing the mass immigration into Europe.
Do you see a pattern here?
Do you still think all this was not part of a plan?
Fact: Most of the "refugees" are young men.
Shouldn't they mostly be women and children?
There is no doubt that among all these millions of young male refugees flooding Europe at least some are from these mercenary terrorist armies which are all offshoots of the Muslim Brotherhood.
There is no doubt that they are being placed in Europe intentionally.
What a great scheme. Bomb the hell out of these countries and destroy them in every way possible.
Kill their leaders and install puppet leaders in their place.
Create, fund and arm armies of mercenaries to take control of these countries and then claim they are the enemy you are fighting.
Organize and fund mass immigration of mostly young men from these countries to enter Europe and create chaos there.
Destroy European culture and society.
USA is next.
That is exactly what is happening.
You probably know there are a lot of pictures circulating that claim to show refugees in America that are actually pictures of refugees in other nations.
According to the State Department, of the 10,000 Syrian refugees who were admitted to the U.S. this last year approximately 80% are women or children, 60% are under age 18, and only half of 1% are adult men unattached to families.
I stopped reading right there.
GodsEmbryo
Closed Account
I think it's important enough to point out some nuances here especially since you always claim the media are misleading us. Yet this "fact" is a fine example of the media not doing their homework.
In a historical context refugees have always been more male than female due to the dangers of the trip. Not only do they have to escape a war zone and travel hundreds of miles without lodgings or protection - which is very hard for the older people - but many families do not have the money to finance a trip to a safe country including the high prices for smugglers for all family members. Smugglers who can't be trusted by the way and might sell young women and children who travel alone as prostitutes or slaves. They might also be victim of assault or rape.
Arab countries like Syria also have a male dominated society; man are considered more important then women, usually have a better education etc, something that will benefit them once they reach Europe to get a job. But it also means that in this war with many fighting groups wanting them as soldiers, many young male refugees are trying to flee compulsory military service. They wouldn't be able to support or protect their families.
So it's no surprise families try to reach a refugee camp or border and send younger males on a dangerous trip to reach Europe. These younger males might be able to support their families financially with a job or in case they get asylum they can reunify their family. It's their best chance.
That being said, it all comes down to the numbers. The Asylum Statistics by Eurostat are numbers that pretty much always show up in an argument about why Syrian refugees seem to be young men. However, these statistics focusses on applications from citizens of non-member countries without differentiating the countries. These numbers also include economical refugees from all kind of countries. And therefore are misleading.
Statistics show the numbers are pretty even between men and women according to the United Nations High Commission on Refugees. It's when you look at the numbers for refugees who travelled by sea throught the Mediterranean when you can spot the difference: 55% male, 18% female; 27% children (Refugees/Migrants Emergency Response - Mediterranean).
In other words, while the majority seeking asylum in Europe might be adult males (for reasons given earlier), the statistics from the UNHCR show that of the total refugees coming out of the Syrian conflict (this includes refugees in the camps), the split is pretty even. In fact it would be very weird and fucked up if women and children were the majority trying the dangerous trip.
And within all of that is an explanation why Europe and The United States must take them in and their neighbor Saudi Arabia doesn't have to?
Thought so.
GodsEmbryo
Closed Account
And where do I state that Europe and the United States must take them in and Saoudi Arabia not?
It certainly seems to be a justification of why millions of Syrian males are migrating to the west. Tell me that you are not in favor of Syrian men flooding Europe and I will retract my comment.
The expenses would certainly be less if their next door neighbor would allow them in.
.
Rock-a-by baby
On the tree top,
When the wind blows
The cradle will rock.
When the bough breaks,
The cradle will fall,
And down will fall baby
Cradle and all.
(Wikipedia)
(lol)
At least some of the Brits are trying to fight against the Arab invasion:
Many Arab countries are constantly at war without the influence of Western countries.
Syrian women, children and older people in Finland.
GodsEmbryo
Closed Account
:1orglaugh Are you on drugs or something? Or forgot to take your pills? Explain to me why my explanation of refugees being mostly men because of a dangerous trip suddenly becomes a justification for Syrian males to migrate to the West and an explanation why Saoudi Arabia shouldn't take refugees.
Perhaps you would have a point, if you didn't have a track record of defending Muslims, mass migration and constantly criticizing conservative ideas and Christians.
GodsEmbryo
Closed Account
Still waiting for an explanation.
Yeah, these people shouldn't be allowed to leave their country.
They are welcome to go to Saudi Arabia.
Wait!
Let's get it out in the open so there won't be any confusion.
I believe that you as a globalist, atheist , derive some pleasure from seeing Christians at odds with Islam.
Instead of explaining the economics involved of Syrian men migrating to the west, maybe you should be concerned that women and children are being left behind in a war torn country.
The women and children didn't create the situation yet the men get to leave.
You explanation seemed asinine considering what ones left behind have to endure, and I simply objected to it.
As usual, you do not take kindly to being challenged on anything.
It is not racist to oppose the Arab invasion.
They have their own countries where they can live.
The Syrians have taken up arms so they reaped now what they have sown.
Supafly
Retired Mod
Just by making not only ignorant but blatantly stupid (If I was to believe you were so stupid) about "Invasions". Do you look at the way the people get slaughtered in Syria? Have you even just spoken to some of these?If you have just spoken and witnessed the actual, traumatized kids, many of whom have fled alone for something like a thousand kilometers, their lives destroyed, having seen and exoperienced things we can't even imagine ourselves - I have met a number of them - you are cruel and I pity you.
Similar threads
