Samuel L. Jackson promots RedTube

[knowone]

Samuel L. Jackson -- Angers XXX Actors - Stop Promoting Free Porn!

http://www.tmz.com/2014/05/01/samuel-l-jackson-steal-porn-redtube-xxx-nick-fuy-boycott/

 

[Little Red Wagon Repairman]

"Get'cho muthafuckin' porn off the muthafuckin' tube fo' muthafuckin' free!"

 

[Will E Worm]

Is there nothing Jackson won't do for money?

We need a break from him.

Some of these sites have movies you can't find any more and from sites that no longer exist.
So, there's a need for them.

 

[Anonyne#017]

Then what about porn girls who are themselves promoting pages which offer free porn videos? How much time do content owners spend on removing their contents from those pages and how much content is left there purposely for promotion? How much do porn girls care about videos in tube pages if those videos are not directly from their own personal pages? How much of this is used to gain popularity to bring people to their own pages or other personal promotion like; hooking, stip club popularity or other activities outside of porn movies?

What about youtube? One of the most popular threads around here is based on users posting links to ripped off music even if it's not whole album at once? I remember also seeing some bigger name in porn admit indirectly of using certain pirated content...

 

[Philbert]

There's a shitload of pay sites on RedTube, WTF is the problem?
Are there starving pornstars on streetcorners with signs (Will give BJs for food or cash)?

(If so, send me a PM with an exact address!)

YouTube allows content to stay if no one requests it not be displayed...lots of missing content on YouTube, or just bits and snips to see.
I imagine it's easy to lock down content for most sites that want for the most part.

As long as he's quoting Scripture I have no problem with Sammie being a front man...

 

[darkwarrior3007]

Is there nothing Jackson won't do for money?

We need a break from him.

Some of these sites have movies you can't find any more and from sites that no longer exist.
So, there's a need for them.

Did you even watch the video in the link? Samuel L. Jackson was answering a question, same as Scarlett Johansson and Chris Evans.

 

[Philbert]

There's a shitload of pay sites on RedTube, WTF is the problem?
Are there starving pornstars on streetcorners with signs (Will give BJs for food or cash)?

(If so, send me a PM with an exact address!)

YouTube allows content to stay if no one requests it not be displayed...lots of missing content on YouTube, or just bits and snips to see.
I imagine it's easy to lock down content for most sites that want for the most part.

As long as he's quoting Scripture I have no problem with Sammie being a front man...

"Adult actress Catalina Cruz is demanding a boycott of Jackson's films ... saying Hollywood vehemently opposes piracy of mainstream movies ... but somehow thinks it's okay for people to steal a 5-minute porn clip."

OK, calm down...I can see what you produce whenever I want, but I can live without a Catalina Cruz video a day.

I AIN"T gonna quit watching the Avengers, Capt. America, and even my usual redo of favorites movies like The Caveman's Valentine and Pulp Fiction.
Learn from the whole Duck Dynasty farce...pick a battle you got a chance of winning.

 

[Will E Worm]

Did you even watch the video in the link? Samuel L. Jackson was answering a question, same as Scarlett Johansson and Chris Evans.

I'm tired of seeing him.

He never seems to turn down any script.
Enough is enough.


If he can promote a site like that, then why not make a site that has free mainstream movies?

Instead the Hollywood and movie industry whines about sites like Napster, Kazaa, and Limewire.

 

[Little Red Wagon Repairman]

He never seems to turn down any script.
Enough is enough.

Kinda like the Michael Caine of foul-mouthed black guys.

"Gots me money?"

 

[Anonyne#017]

I've understood that it's one of the biggest porn companies which actually owns many of those infamous free porn streaming pages. Does this ring any bells? Let's make some hypothesis based on that; Actual problem are not those people who watch tube pages, but problem is coming from the very inside of porn industry itself and anyone who uploads their content to those pages to promote themselves or watches them. You know to look at mirror first when you start to point your fingers at someone regarding to free porn.

Big bad porn guys with suits probably originally saw that lot of people were watching porn for free and decided to take their part to get whatever leftover dirty money from traffic and advertisements by taking control of that part of business. How much of free porn content is actually legitimately owned by the very same people who manage those free porn sites and how much content is to bring down their competition?

Then again, kind of makes sense that porn girls don't dare to say anything against one of the biggest cause of their problems, because it's the same thing that pays their own salary. Those porn girls are already themselves as a part of problem they claim to fight against, they even contribute to the problem itself, they even directly promote those free porn streaming pages in events nowadays. Hypocritical, greedy and cowarded porn girls who only care for their own asses and money are trying to quilt trip people from watching free porn, while they themselves are working for the very causes of their issues, people who owns those free porn streaming pages. Why? Because they pay well, are big names and porn girls need publicy to get their business running? Who cares what happens to those videos once you have been paid for a scene?

Now the question is, am I too far away from the truth with my guess?

What comes to Youtube and bad guys called Google. Anyone with common sense already should know that Google itself is not only the biggest internet piracy companies of all time, but also one of the biggest collectors of personal information of people...