Don't they kinda suck live? Well, at least the singing part. Lee's voice....I don't know. :dunno: But yeah, they're kinda cool.
I saw them in 1990 and 1992 and they where great . Lee's voice was perfect except when he sang some very old songs like "The temples of Syrinx" from the album 2112 ( 1976 ) .
then they were not great. if they were great, wouldnt you want to see them more than once?Great band.
No interest in seeing bands - any band - more then once.
Don't they kinda suck live? Well, at least the singing part. Lee's voice....I don't know. :dunno: But yeah, they're kinda cool.
1) I typed they were a great band. Not whether they were great in concert or not.then they were not great. if they were great, wouldnt you want to see them more than once?![]()
1) I typed they were a great band. Not whether they were great in concert or not.
and 2) I typed I have no interest in seeing any band in concert more then once.
what makes a band great is their ability to play live. not what some machine has dubbed over.
what makes a band great is their ability to play live. not what some machine has dubbed over.
I am not surprised you would think that way.
You are wrong - IMO.
Music is about art (at it's best). Performing is about egos and dollars (at it's average).
what im talking about has nothing to do with ego or money.
You typed:
'what makes a band great is their ability to play live.'
No offense, but that is ridiculous.
There have been a tremendous number of great bands/performers that either didn't play live much or did not do it well or just plain hated it.
Maybe all the bands you like have to play well live to be great. Not mine.
If they happen to be great live - fine. But it is a tiny part of the overall makeup of what makes up a great band/performer - IMO.