Rosetta mission : A probe landed on a moving comet, 320.000.000 miles from Earth

Rosetta mission: behind the scenes of a historic landing




Philae landing controllers made no secret that, for all their expertise and preparation, luck had its part to play


A sharp turn and the European Space Agency’s $1.5bn Rosetta probe swooped down over comet 67P and from an altitude of 20km released its robotic lander, Philae, on a slow, silent descent to the surface. It had taken mission controllers 10 years and 6bn km to get to this point of cosmic theatre playing, 510m km from Earth, beyond the orbit of Mars. Mission control – watched by the world – held its breath.

The landing craft separated from its mothership at 0835GMT on Wednesday morning. The night before, a fault on the lander had nearly scuppered the plan. An upwards-facing nitrogen thruster, intended to fire on touchdown to prevent the lander from bouncing off the surface failed to respond to commands. Managers decided to gamble. They gave the green light for go.

Fred Jansen, Rosetta mission manager, said: “Twenty years ago we said we wanted to go to a comet that we knew nothing about. There are risks but I think our chances of success are 75 percent.”

The mood at European Space Operations Centre in Darmstadt, Germany, was one of high excitement and no little anxiety. At such a distance, signals take 28 minutes and 20 seconds to travel from Earth to Rosetta and vice versa.

At 0903 the message from Rosetta arrived. The lander had separated. From here on, mission controllers could only watch and wait. “Philae is gone. It is on its path down to the comet,” said Andrea Accomazzo, Rosetta flight operations director. “Philae is on its own now,” said Stephan Ulamec, the lander’s manager.

Shortly after separation, Matt Taylor, Rosetta project scientist, said: “Exploration is about going to the limits. Everyone is nervous, everyone is on tenterhooks. But we know the risk is worth it.”

Minutes after the separation signal arrived Rosetta lost contact with Philae. The interruption in communications, caused by Rosetta’s defensive manoeuvre to a safe distance from the comet, was expected. But even scheduled events can take their toll on fingernails. The team faced a two-hour wait before re-establishing contact with the falling probe. Two hours came and went. Then, contact. At Darmstadt, cheers filled the room. “It’s still alive,” said one of the staffers.

Mission controllers made no secret that, for all their expertise and preparation, luck had its part to play. They had chosen the landing site because it had the best chance of being flat, well lit, to charge Philae’s batteries through its solar arrays, and with a good view of the whole comet. But landing on an active comet had never been done before. The probe could land anywhere in a 1 square kilometre area. “We’ll need some luck not to land on a boulder or a steep slope,” said Ulamec, as Philae continued its descent.

The discoverers of comet 67P, Klim Ivanovych Churyumov and Svetlana Ivanovna Gerasimenko, were mingling with the other scientists and media at the ESA’s Darmstadt centre. Pondering the comet, Gerasimenko said: “It reminds me of a boot.”

With contact re-established, the first instrument data and images from Philae’s cameras began to stream back to Rosetta which relayed them on to Earth. The lander’s suite of microcameras had taken a parting shot of Rosetta moments after separation.

Looking back towards the mothership, one of Rosetta’s 14m-long solar arrays was clearly visible in an image bearing a bright flare from the sun. Another image, taken from Rosetta’s Osiris camera, showed a gleaming white Philae, with landing legs unfurled, falling into the darkness.

ESA managers expected to hear if Philae touched down safely during the hour after 1530GMT. This was the moment: the culmination of years of work for engineers and scientists on the lander. Many had had far too little sleep. “I’m knackered but I’m also very, very excited. We’re close now,” said Taylor.


The historic moment in the Darmstadt control centre was captured by ESA’s TV cameras. At 1603 they received a signal from Philae. A touchdown signal. But the jubilation was not immediate. Brows furrowed, whispers were exchanged. Then came the announcement. “We are on the comet!” said Ulamec. “We see the lander sitting on the rock,” said Accomazzo.

Then, confusion. At first, ESA reported that Philae had fired its twin harpoons to secure it to the comet surface, and rewound the tethers attached to them. Then it became clear the harpoons had not fired. With nothing to secure the lander to the comet, its chances of remaining there, let alone doing useful science, were unknown.

As celebrations broke out in Darmstadt, ESA staff at the Lander Control Centre in Cologne had also spotted that something was wrong. Data beamed back from Philae showed the lander was still moving. Specifically, it was rotating. Impossible on the ground, it meant the spacecraft had touched down and bounced back off again. Finally, the craft seemed to come to a standstill. Thirty minutes later, Rosetta lost contact, as the comet spun and Philae disappeared over the horizon.

On Thursday morning, scientists re-established contact with Philae around 0600GMT. “The emotions all came back again when I heard we had telemetry,” said Jansen. “I went into the room where the instrument principal investigators are and I saw the images on Jean-Pierre’s screen and everyone was just: ‘yes!’.”

Rosetta-landing-sequence-WE.svg


Data collected from the lander overnight began to arrive. Poring over the numbers, a picture of what happened emerged. Philae touched down within 50 metres of its target on a site that would have proved perfect for its future operations. The landing gear flexed, the signal to fire the harpoons was given, but for some unknown reason the anchors did not work. The gravity of the comet was so weak that Philae bounced off. Having touched down at 1533 it soared 1km off the surface and came back down nearly two hours later, at 1726. It then bounced again, more modestly, and came to rest at 1733.

That Philae had come to a rest was the good news. But there was bad news too. In the time it took Philae to land for good, the comet had rotated. Instead of settling on flat, exposed terrain with plenty of sunlight, the lander came to rest on more hostile ground. At around 1640, ESA released a panoramic image from Philae that revealed the lander’s precarious position. Closed in by rock and with one leg in the sky, most of the craft is in darkness.

But science is being done on the comet. Data is coming back. And nothing has dented the elation of the team that placed the lander on the comet. “What’s really impressive here is not the degree of failure, but the degree of success,” said Jean Pierre Bibring, Rosetta’s lead scientist. It is amazing where we are. We are at the limit of what humankind could do.”
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/nov/13/philae-landing-rosetta-mission-good-bad-news



Philae comet lander tries drilling and hammering to free itself


Tools’ action will cause an opposite reaction in Rosetta’s Philae lander, perhaps nudging it into a more sunlit position


Scientists have begun activating a drill and hammer on board the robotic comet probe Philae in an attempt to move it into sunlight so that its solar panels can be charged.

Time is running out for the European Space Agency’s lander. Since its bumpy triple touchdown on Wednesday, the spacecraft has been resting on its side, lodged in the shadows of a cliff or large boulder.

Philae has been receiving just 1.5 hours of sunlight instead of the expected 6-7 hours. This is not enough to charge the secondary batteries. With an initial battery life of about 60 hours, Philae’s mission could be over in less than 20 hours.

The primary mission objective of analysing the composition of the comet was designed to be achievable within this timeframe but landing on its side has made things difficult. On Thursday, the lander sent back historic first images taken from the surface of a comet.

A communications window opened on Friday morning and contact was re-established with the lander. More science data has been collected and sent to Earth, as well as telemetry data detailing the lander’s health.

A second communications window will open tonight, but Paolo Ferri, Esa’s Head of mission operations, European Space Operations Centre, said this morning that there was no guarantee that Philae’s primary battery would still be charged by then.

Scientists have begun to activate the lander’s drill. Designed to extract sub-surface samples for analysis, it will be a risky manoeuvre. Philae is not anchored to the surface, and the rotation of the drill will cause an equal and opposite reaction on the lander. It could make Philae do a cartwheel.

Then, as the drill presses into the surface, it could push the lander away. Either of these consequences could move Philae into a better position for receiving sunlight, or they could topple the craft and end the mission.

Another instrument deployed by the lander overnight is MUPUS (Multi-Purpose Sensors for Surface and Subsurface Science) which hammers into the ground to measure the strength of the surface.

If Philae is still alive after the drilling, then more radical action could be taken to try to move it. “We have four systems that could move the lander,” said Jean-Pierre Bibring, lead lander scientist at the Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale, Université Paris Sud, France.

One possibility is to move the landing legs. According to Stephan Ulamec, Philae lander manager, DLR, these could be used to try to hop the lander into the sunlight. But one leg is sticking up into space rather than in contact with the surface, so there might not be enough spring in Philae’s step to achieve this.

Finally, in desperation, Bibring says they could even try re-firing the harpoons and thruster system that malfunctioned on landing day to jolt Philae into a new position.

Fred Jansen, Rosetta mission manager, European Space Agency, European Space Research and Technology Centre, struck a philosophical note, saying: “It has been absolutely fantastic. Of course you want the mission to last forever but there is a limited amount of sunlight.”

Meanwhile, Esa is still trying to establish Philae’s exact final landing spot. This is being done with the radar system on Rosetta and the OSIRIS camera.

The radar system, called CONSERT, can be used like a GPS satellite on Earth but because Rosetta is just one satellite, it takes longer to extract a precise location. On Earth, satnav systems usually coordinate three or more GPS signals.

Regardless of what happens to Philae, the main Rosetta mission, which analyses the comet from orbit continues for the next 20 months.
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/nov/14/philae-comet-lander-drills-hammers-rosetta
 

bobjustbob

Proud member of FreeOnes Hall Of Fame. Retired to
I've been following it this week and find the whole thing absolutely amazing.
 
It's a pretty nice feat to land on the comet like they did. I have to admit that I think the mechanisms that failed to secure the landing are a pretty huge screw up that can only be sugar coated so much. Out of all the things somebody would want to make sure had rock solid reliability those were probably near the top of the list. They are pretty fortunate the lander didn't achieve escape velocity when it rebounded as it is. They got lucky. Still, even getting to the point where they are now is a noteworthy.
 
Top