• Hey, guys! FreeOnes Tube is up and running - see for yourself!
  • FreeOnes Now Listing Male and Trans Performers! More info here!

Ron Paul's Full Speech at the Southern Republican Leadership Conference

If the sheeple really want hope and change, they'd vote for Dr. Paul :thumbsup:
 
If the sheeple really want hope and change they'd smoke weed and not pay their taxes.

fixed.

Could the Tea Baggers/ Libertarians/ Ron Paulluters be any more irrelevant?

Their solution to the nation's health care: "Obamacare is bad!"

Their solution to the budget crisis:"Bail outs are bad!"

No, seriously, what is their solution to the budget crisis? "Don't pay taxes, don't fill out the Census form!"

What are we going to do about Afghanistan? "..."

OK... "Investigate 9/11!"

How are we supposed to do that? "Close down the border, stop illegal immigration!"

But we don't have any money and you think government is bad, so...

"Legalize pot!"

Ah fuck it.
 
:edit:
 
fixed.

Could the Tea Baggers/ Libertarians/ Ron Paulluters be any more irrelevant?

Their solution to the nation's health care: "Obamacare is bad!"

Their solution to the budget crisis:"Bail outs are bad!"

No, seriously, what is their solution to the budget crisis? "Don't pay taxes, don't fill out the Census form!"

What are we going to do about Afghanistan? "..."

OK... "Investigate 9/11!"

How are we supposed to do that? "Close down the border, stop illegal immigration!"

But we don't have any money and you think government is bad, so...

"Legalize pot!"

Ah fuck it.

HA! You're too much. This entire thread is based on a video of a speech that you clearly didn't watch, yet you commented. Proving that you have no idea what you're talking about.

Has Ron Paul EVER suggested that 9-11 wasn't an Al Qaeda operation? No.
Has he ever insisted people not pay their taxes? No.
Has he ever advocated pot use? No.
Has he ever suggested people not fill out the Census? No.
Did he suggest repealing Obamacare? No. (As a matter of fact, he talks about that quite a bit in the video you didn't watch.)

Talk about irrelevant. And yet, like an idiot, I respond to this knee-jerk, uninformed nonsense. But don't worry, he wouldn't win even if he decided to run..so there'll be no end to CIA assassination and UAV bombings in Yemen and Pakistan and troop expansions in Afghanistan. You'll get to keep your beloved Obama for another four years, most likely.
 
fixed.

Could the Tea Baggers/ Libertarians/ Ron Paulluters be any more irrelevant?

Their solution to the nation's health care: "Obamacare is bad!"

Their solution to the budget crisis:"Bail outs are bad!"

No, seriously, what is their solution to the budget crisis? "Don't pay taxes, don't fill out the Census form!"

What are we going to do about Afghanistan? "..."

OK... "Investigate 9/11!"

How are we supposed to do that? "Close down the border, stop illegal immigration!"

But we don't have any money and you think government is bad, so...

"Legalize pot!"

Ah fuck it.

:thumbsup::hatsoff:

It's easy to be the party of "against" or "no" without offering legit alternatives.
 
:thumbsup::hatsoff:

It's easy to be the party of "against" or "no" without offering legit alternatives.

How is this a "Party of No" or "Tea Party" thread? During the speech, Huckabee supporters were booing him and chanting "Ron Paul sucks." He was boo'd for saying that Obama's a Corporatist and not a Socialist. Go to a Tea Party rally and see who is favored more, Paul or Huckabee.

I love how Ron Paul is being credited as both the leader of the Tea Party pitchfork and torch crowd AND the stoner-hippie 9-11 conspiracy nut crowd:rolleyes::confused:
 
How is this a "Party of No" or "Tea Party" thread? During the speech, Huckabee supporters were booing him and chanting "Ron Paul sucks." He was boo'd for saying that Obama's a Corporatist and not a Socialist. Go to a Tea Party rally and see who is favored more, Paul or Huckabee.

I love how Ron Paul is being credited as both the leader of the Tea Party pitchfork and torch crowd AND the stoner-hippie 9-11 conspiracy nut crowd:rolleyes::confused:

I was responding only to what Calpoon said.:2 cents:
 

maildude

Postal Paranoiac
I watched the whole thing. And now I'm about to kvitch. :eek:
 
meh...

Paul's more correct than a lot of conservatives on a handful of issues, but on everything else he's still just another authoritarian right-winger.
 
Has Ron Paul EVER suggested that 9-11 wasn't an Al Qaeda operation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihCP3cfS88E
"I haven't accepted the 9/11 investigation."


Has he ever insisted people not pay their taxes?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZl6202HJGQ
"Do you sympathize with the one million Americans that don't pay their taxes? Paul: Yeah, I do."

Has he ever advocated pot use?
http://board.freeones.com/showpost.php?p=4056202&postcount=1
"People who are dying from aids and cancer are getting benefits from marijuana"


Has he ever suggested people not fill out the Census?
http://www.ronpaul.com/2010-03-08/ron-paul-on-the-census-2010/
"Last week Congress voted to encourage participation in the 2010 census. I voted “No” on this resolution"

Did he suggest repealing Obamacare?
http://www.ronpaul.com/on-the-issues/health-care/
"Obamacare is the worst possible answer"

Talk about irrelevant. And yet, like an idiot, I respond to this knee-jerk, uninformed nonsense

I agree with you on that one. Debating on the internet is like wining a medal in the Special Olympics.
 
I think some people must have slept through HS civics class... It's not that governments can't do things, it's that the Constitution specifically LIMITS what the FEDERAL government can do... at least until the last 80 years of chipping away at it by the "liberals." States have MUCH more leeway to run as many entitlement programs as they like.

And with the mammoth, expanded Federal government, what do we get? A giant, broke, power hungry bureaucracy that cannot be controlled anymore.

It's almost as if those old white guys who wrote those documents back in the 1770s knew something from studying philosophy and history or something....
 
I think some people must have slept through HS civics class... It's not that governments can't do things, it's that the Constitution specifically LIMITS what the FEDERAL government can do... at least until the last 80 years of chipping away at it by the "liberals." States have MUCH more leeway to run as many entitlement programs as they like.

And with the mammoth, expanded Federal government, what do we get? A giant, broke, power hungry bureaucracy that cannot be controlled anymore.

It's almost as if those old white guys who wrote those documents back in the 1770s knew something from studying philosophy and history or something....

I cannot rep him so DITTO
 
I cannot rep him so DITTO

Why thank you kind sir.

And for those of you who don't think BHO really meant "change" when he said it, here's a quote for you to mull over while he looks for a justice to sit on the highest court in the US, a body that is supposed to safeguard our individual, Constitutionally-guaranteed rights:

On Jan. 18, 2001m on Public Radio WBEZ-FM, Chicago, Obama complained that the Earl Warren Court "wasn't that radical" because "it didn't break free from the essential constraints placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution. ... The Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and serve more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society."

Still want hope and change?? I'll keep my rights, and try to keep my money that I EARNED thank you very much. :thefinger
 
Why thank you kind sir.

And for those of you who don't think BHO really meant "change" when he said it, here's a quote for you to mull over while he looks for a justice to sit on the highest court in the US, a body that is supposed to safeguard our individual, Constitutionally-guaranteed rights:

On Jan. 18, 2001m on Public Radio WBEZ-FM, Chicago, Obama complained that the Earl Warren Court "wasn't that radical" because "it didn't break free from the essential constraints placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution. ... The Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and serve more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society."

Still want hope and change?? I'll keep my rights, and try to keep my money that I EARNED thank you very much. :thefinger

Well, let's see how it plays out in reality. We've already seen the socialist "takeover" of the banks and autos talking point fall apart in the last days.

There has been a steady stream of reports contradicting the naysayers in the past weeks...so let's just see what actually happens.
 
Ahhh...libertarians, a group of people where nearly their entire philosophy is disguising unabashed shameless selfishness under the guise of "liberty" because they have to rationalize it somehow instead of just admitting their actual behavior and nature to themselves or because it's easier to fool other people into swallowing their tripe when they do.
 
I thought this was about the drag queen Ru Paul.... I was about to say I didn't know he/she was Republican :D
 
Top