repeal the civil rights act of 1964

[mrexcellent2190]

the civil rights act of 1964 is very unconstitutional and has brought ruin to american society i advocate its repealing so that individual states may dictate their own policies more freely how do you guys feel about this.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964

 

[Legzman]

Racist fuck!

No I don't really think you are, but figured I'd post it before someone else does. But given recent news events related to discrimination, I think it warrants looking into.

 

[Will E Worm]

the civil rights act of 1964 is very unconstitutional and has brought ruin to american society

Very true.

There's many things that need to go, because they are unconstitutional.


http://www.constitutionparty.com/

 

[bobjustbob]

the civil rights act of 1964 is very unconstitutional and has brought ruin to american society i advocate its repealing so that individual states may dictate their own policies more freely how do you guys feel about this.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964

Okay, you've got our attention. Which titles of the Civil Rights Act would you like to repeal and restore to the individual states?

 

[mrexcellent2190]

all of them the states should be able to govern themselves autonomously i feel this bill renders the constitution almost useless

 

[bobjustbob]

Okay, pick one and tell us how it would benefit an individual state.

 

[mrexcellent2190]

okay, title three denies people entry to public facilities based on national origin race etc. this would benefit society because it would encourage members of the same ethnic groups to stick together and work improving the economy. this would also help build up small ethic enclaves

 

[bobjustbob]

So libraries, parks, parking facilities, roadways, post offices, schools, everything paid for by tax dollars should be set up by the state as segregated? Seems to me if all of our tax dollars are paying for it, everyone should be able to use it.

 

[mrexcellent2190]

i don't think so

 

[Johan]

the civil rights act of 1964 is very unconstitutional and has brought ruin to american society i advocate its repealing so that individual states may dictate their own policies more freely how do you guys feel about this.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
14th Amendment of the US Consitution, Section 1

The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation
15th Amendment of the US Constitution

Now, you may explain how the 1964 Civil Rights Act is unconstitutional...

 

[pool_hustler]

Yeah, let's go back to the glorious days of "Jim Crow"
Now there's a brilliant idea

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
14th Amendment of the US Consitution, Section 1

The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation
15th Amendment of the US Constitution

Deserves reposting.

 

[mrexcellent2190]

the civil rights acts is not very different from the dread scott decision

 

[pool_hustler]

how so?

 

[mrexcellent2190]

becuz it says that in order to receive the same treatment as whites blacks need to achieve less in school work etc ...dont you see

 

[Johan]

becuz it says that in order to receive the same treatment as whites blacks need to achieve less in school work etc ...dont you see

Ineteresting. Can you provide us with some actual quote from it that say so ?

 

[mrexcellent2190]

no the idea is that white males are responsible for the oppression of women homosexuals and minorities in the west north america and europe and the they way they are to make up for this is through affirmative action food stamps etc this is saying that this is a crime that only the white man is capable of attoning for and is a form of white supremacy

 

[pool_hustler]

say what???
It doesn't say (or even imply) anything of the sort.

The Dred Scott decision "held that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, could not be American citizens and therefore had no standing to sue in federal court, and that the federal government had no power to regulate slavery in the federal territories acquired after the creation of the United States."

Chief Justice Roger Taney's view of the founding father's opinion on negroes was that they "had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit. He was bought and sold and treated as an ordinary article of merchandise and traffic, whenever profit could be made by it."

 

[mrexcellent2190]

Yes it does VIEW IT FROM BOTH A LEGAL ANFD HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

 

[Johan]

no

Then it means you're just making up shit and you don't have any actual fact or information to back it up

the idea is that white males are responsible for the oppression of women homosexuals and minorities in the west north america and europe and the they way they are to make up for this is through affirmative action food stamps etc this is saying that this is a crime that only the white man is capable of attoning for and is a form of white supremacy

Food stamps ? You're saying that food stamps are not for white males ? That no white males are on food stamps ?
'cause, according ti a Pew Research study, 15% of white people in America are or have ben on food stamps http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tan...cs-and-demographics-of-food-stamp-recipients/

Affirmative Action is a different subject. I could follow you on that but I think it would be interesting to have some datas about how many of the people who benefit from Affirmative Action actually graduate from college.

 

[Johan]

Anyway, this is not some punishment inflicted to white male for their past deeds. It is a way to give equal opportunity to everyone.
Isn't the very idea of what America is : a country in which everyone is given the same chances of success in life, a country in which wether you live a prosper or a miserable life is up to you, depends only on how hard you'ready to work ?