Recession means fewer babies; US births fell 2 pct

[Friday on my mind]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090807/ap_on_re_us/us_baby_bust

ATLANTA – There aren't just fewer jobs in a recession. There are fewer babies, too.

U.S. births fell in 2008, the first full year of the recession, marking the first annual decline in births since the start of the decade and ending an American baby boomlet."



Every dark cloud has a silver lining as they say.:thumbsup:

 

[busenbust]

Job cuts??

 

[Will E Worm]

So, they say. What else are you going to do sitting at home with the wife?

Since most Americans will not read, even if they were paid. :tongue:

Babies aren't a bad thing. Even though the liberals, Socialist Communists, would like everyone to believe that way. :crash:

 

[mrtrebus]

Read or fuck?
Read or fuck?
:dunno:

 

[titsrock]

Babies aren't a bad thing. Even though the liberals, Socialist Communists, would like everyone to believe that way. :crash:

It's not that babies are bad. It's just that farming out childcare to nannies and then bitching about public services like education and healthcare gets a little old from Wacko Conservative Douchebags.

Conservative Douchebags don't want to raise **** either, you know....

Maybe in the ***** Conservative World--there is no Gov't but a bunch of private enterprise SuperNannies who will do everything (on the cheap, of course) for the Conservative Douchebag Nation--teach the bible, polish the guns, keep women in the kitchen, and monitor the borders.:thumbsup:

 

[Will E Worm]

It's not that babies are bad. It's just that farming out childcare to nannies and then bitching about public services like education and healthcare gets a little old from Wacko Conservative Douchebags.

If this country could go back to a one parent working scenario, like it should be, we would be better off.

--teach the Bible, polish the guns and teach *** safety instead of sex ed, husbands taking care of their wives, and monitor the borders.

Sending people who don't like it to another country. :thumbsup:

Sounds good.

 

[ronpaulmyhero]

Well let's face it there have been a lot of stupid people breeding who should not have **** and have no aptitude on how to raise a normally functioning ***. If those babies are being aborted then I say yippee. I am not conserative or liberal just someone who knows logic. Octomom with her 14 **** do you think any of those 14 will turn out normal?

 

[mrtrebus]

Well let's face it there have been a lot of stupid people breeding who should not have **** and have no aptitude on how to raise a normally functioning ***. If those babies are being aborted then I say yippee. I am not conserative or liberal just someone who knows logic. Octomom with her 14 **** do you think any of those 14 will turn out normal?

I'm not sure if they will or not. But should we ban certain people from having ****?!? Who sets the standard?!? Who decides what type of people can procreate?!?

 

[SiCo]

Well let's face it there have been a lot of stupid people breeding who should not have **** and have no aptitude on how to raise a normally functioning ***. If those babies are being aborted then I say yippee. I am not conserative or liberal just someone who knows logic. Octomom with her 14 **** do you think any of those 14 will turn out normal?

Not if their ****** was an octopus.

 

[mrtrebus]

If this country could go back to a one parent working scenario, like it should be, we would be better off.



Sounds good.

You want to be a househusband? I applaud you sir! :hatsoff:

 

[busenbust]

An outlier?? I suspect a reverse, and a return to 'the norm' after the recession (look at Western Europe as of late).

 

[Will E Worm]

Read or fuck?
Read or fuck?
:dunno:

Reading is fundamental and no one has ever died from not having sex.
Something you should know from experience.

We do need more ********.

You want to be a househusband? I applaud you sir! :hatsoff:

No, working from my home is another story.

 

[SiCo]

Reading is fundamental and no one has ever died from no sex.
Something you should know from experience.

We do need more ********.

This is another opener, right?

 

[mrtrebus]

We in Greatus Britannicus are at it more!
http://www.metro.co.uk/news/article..._baby_boom&in_article_id=712336&in_page_id=34
Keeping the British end up! :thumbsup: :hatsoff:

 

[D-rock]

So this mean in about two decades there will be a very vary slight reduction in the drop off of job losses when we go through a recession at that time.

 

[Facetious]

Who in the f#@k would wanna have a burdensome baby to deal with even in a thriving economy ?! all of the annoying ******, screaming, poopy - *** soaked skiffies to have to deal with and if that wasn't enough..... lol :rofl:

 

[Will E Worm]

Who in the f#@k would wanna have a burdensome baby to deal with even in a thriving economy ?! all of the annoying ******, screaming, poopy - *** soaked skiffies to have to deal with and if that wasn't enough..... lol :rofl:

You are required to have ******** and let me home school them. :tongue:

 

[Facetious]

^ Better you than the lackies over at u.s. dept. of re - education . . . way better!

 

[calpoon]

oh Nooo!

the bible doth says be fruitful and multply.

everyone better have ten **** NOW!

at this rate it will take another decade before the population reaches nine billion.

 

[Facetious]

Every dark cloud has a silver lining as they say.:thumbsup:

Silver lining ? How can you be so sure that those would have been births were eventuslly going to be republicans ?
What's more important - building a future democratic voting majority in America or protecting the earth's ability to sustain mankind ?

:tongue: