You can look almost anywhere nowadays and find a rape case. It's not rare at all. It happens to many women and sometimes guys.
The problem is people don't believe the punishment serves the crime in most cases. Sometimes it does and other times it's like why do we even try. I don't think people should be castrated or executed for rape. I always thought about this as the perfect solution for rapists and pedophiles (yes I must include them to). It's the anger and frustration that causes us to want the worst for these type of people.
What if the person who committed the crime was proven innocent at a later time? This has happened in the past with DNA evidence coming into play, but the system seems to be getting better. I mean we don't just hang people if someone said they did something without a case. Also what if the person was having a good time when this happened and was enjoying it, but the other person boasted about the sex. She or he may decide to change their mind and bring a rape case against them, so they don't have to worry about what others think about the person whose being victimized and embarrased about this. I mean rape is embarassing, but if someone is boasting about it it's basically just as bad in many cases.
People also don't care about what's right or wrong in many situations as long as their bringing down someone they don't like. Basically what happened in the duke case. The players were victimized, but they weren't proven guilty because the girl had been bribed to lie.
In the end is execution or castration the real answer?
I think the real answer should be life in prison, so that way if new evidence is brought forward proving them innocent they won't be gone.
This also brings up if the death penalty is right or wrong. Who should be allowed to decide who lives and who dies? Yes many people did commit these crimes, but aren't we just as bad as the person for executing them? Two wrongs don't make a right in my opinion.
What do you guys think? Am I crazy?
The problem is people don't believe the punishment serves the crime in most cases. Sometimes it does and other times it's like why do we even try. I don't think people should be castrated or executed for rape. I always thought about this as the perfect solution for rapists and pedophiles (yes I must include them to). It's the anger and frustration that causes us to want the worst for these type of people.
What if the person who committed the crime was proven innocent at a later time? This has happened in the past with DNA evidence coming into play, but the system seems to be getting better. I mean we don't just hang people if someone said they did something without a case. Also what if the person was having a good time when this happened and was enjoying it, but the other person boasted about the sex. She or he may decide to change their mind and bring a rape case against them, so they don't have to worry about what others think about the person whose being victimized and embarrased about this. I mean rape is embarassing, but if someone is boasting about it it's basically just as bad in many cases.
People also don't care about what's right or wrong in many situations as long as their bringing down someone they don't like. Basically what happened in the duke case. The players were victimized, but they weren't proven guilty because the girl had been bribed to lie.
In the end is execution or castration the real answer?
I think the real answer should be life in prison, so that way if new evidence is brought forward proving them innocent they won't be gone.
This also brings up if the death penalty is right or wrong. Who should be allowed to decide who lives and who dies? Yes many people did commit these crimes, but aren't we just as bad as the person for executing them? Two wrongs don't make a right in my opinion.
What do you guys think? Am I crazy?