I recently submitted some (rather obvious) changes to the babes database that were, I'm surprised to report, rejected. I don't mind, it doesn't really BOTHER me about any concerns over my own well-being or rewards, I can't really care very much about it from that point of view. But it IS clearly a "wrong" thing in the listings, for four or six different girls, which didn't get accepted. I wonder why? I don't really know the rules around here, and I'd be happy to try to comply with whatever is suggested. I'm a little surprised at the result.
So here's some specifics, IIRC. Just one babe comes to mind, the one named "Red Fox." I submitted that she is a PORN STAR and not a GLAMOUR MODEL, because she sucks dick, tongues cunt, spreads her legs for the intake of cock, and even has been known to enjoy a facial or two. Sounds like PORN STAR rather than mere GLAMOUR MODEL to me, right? But maybe I just don't know the definitions? Furthermore, I see (now ... doh! I should-a tried to look for that sort of thing, first, before submitting the change) that the change in her profession has been submitted, and rejected, previously by other users. Weirdness no? I guess if I had known how to identify those kinds of previous submissions (yes, I do recall the pop-up which said, that it had been rejected before, but I didn't know what it meant, at the time; NOW I get it! doh!) I would have searched for them and not redundantly cost the moderators and site-owners all that extra work to re-reject the same old submission.
So, SORRY, I didn't mean to submit those readily rejected suggestions for changes to the database, I wouldn't have done it if I'd understood the system better. But anyway, WHY the rejections? Is there something about certain chicks who suck dick and fuck cock and perform full hardcore in most of their scenes, that they are NOT qualified as PORN STAR for their profession? It just confuses me somewhat and I want to know the "right" way to identify the girls, so I don't make the same mistake again. I promise to do my best not to screw up any more, like I did with the submitting of rejection-worthy database change suggestions; but how do I figure out which submissions ARE rejection-worthy, if I can't figure out WHY these submissions were rejected? Aside from the fact that someone was (I think wrongly) rejected at a time earlier than I was, I don't see any other reasons for the rejections.
It's not a big deal. It took me too long to describe it (hence my nick-name, operational hazard of my own bad internet writing habits, sorry) but I don't really have a lot of emotion invested in it. I just would like to get the concept and move forward. Clearly I don't get the concept yet. Maybe I missed a FAQ somewhere?
Thanks dudes, y'all keep on whackin' ...
BG
So here's some specifics, IIRC. Just one babe comes to mind, the one named "Red Fox." I submitted that she is a PORN STAR and not a GLAMOUR MODEL, because she sucks dick, tongues cunt, spreads her legs for the intake of cock, and even has been known to enjoy a facial or two. Sounds like PORN STAR rather than mere GLAMOUR MODEL to me, right? But maybe I just don't know the definitions? Furthermore, I see (now ... doh! I should-a tried to look for that sort of thing, first, before submitting the change) that the change in her profession has been submitted, and rejected, previously by other users. Weirdness no? I guess if I had known how to identify those kinds of previous submissions (yes, I do recall the pop-up which said, that it had been rejected before, but I didn't know what it meant, at the time; NOW I get it! doh!) I would have searched for them and not redundantly cost the moderators and site-owners all that extra work to re-reject the same old submission.
So, SORRY, I didn't mean to submit those readily rejected suggestions for changes to the database, I wouldn't have done it if I'd understood the system better. But anyway, WHY the rejections? Is there something about certain chicks who suck dick and fuck cock and perform full hardcore in most of their scenes, that they are NOT qualified as PORN STAR for their profession? It just confuses me somewhat and I want to know the "right" way to identify the girls, so I don't make the same mistake again. I promise to do my best not to screw up any more, like I did with the submitting of rejection-worthy database change suggestions; but how do I figure out which submissions ARE rejection-worthy, if I can't figure out WHY these submissions were rejected? Aside from the fact that someone was (I think wrongly) rejected at a time earlier than I was, I don't see any other reasons for the rejections.
It's not a big deal. It took me too long to describe it (hence my nick-name, operational hazard of my own bad internet writing habits, sorry) but I don't really have a lot of emotion invested in it. I just would like to get the concept and move forward. Clearly I don't get the concept yet. Maybe I missed a FAQ somewhere?
Thanks dudes, y'all keep on whackin' ...
BG
