Puppy meat is no worse than a pork chop

Will E Worm

Conspiracy...
Why can't we have dog for dinner? TV chef Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall sparks outrage by claiming puppy meat is no worse than a pork chop

TV chef Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall has sparked outrage after claiming eating puppy meat is no worse than eating a pork chop.
The River Cottage star, who regards himself as a ‘real food campaigner’, suggested that society has unfairly dictated which ******* can be farmed and which can be kept as pets.
His comments were criticised by ****** charities as ‘wholly unacceptable’.

Fearnley-Whittingstall told the Radio Times: ‘In principle, but not in practice, I have no objection to a high-welfare organic puppy ****.
‘You can’t object, unless you also object to the farming of pigs.
‘It’s an artificial construct of our society, a cultural decision, to make pets out of dogs and meat out of pigs.

Premium Link Upgrade

:nono: He should be fired. He's nothing more than a barbarian. :flame:
 

Premium Content

This thread contains exclusive content for our premium community members.

What you're missing:
  • Full discussion and replies
  • Community interaction and voting
Already have an account?
✨ Unlock exclusive discussions and premium features
Premium Benefits:
Exclusive content • Priority support • Advanced features • Full thread access
Top