Diplomatic immunity is a two way street.
The United States has a bigger global footprint of diplomats than any other country and in some bad places.
The benefit of our diplomats having immunity far outweighs the few times that foreign diplomats show their asses in the U.S.
Immunity allows the United States to act with impunity if our diplomats rights have been violated or wrongly accused
That is, unless Obama or Hillary Clinton are in charge of them.
President Ergan of Turkey, President al Assad of Syria, King Al Saoud of Saudi Arabia, President Zayed Al Nahyan of UEA, Emir Al Thani of Qatar.
All dictators
All at least ambiguous towards Daech
All considered as key allies by the US
President Ergan of Turkey, President al Assad of Syria, King Al Saoud of Saudi Arabia, President Zayed Al Nahyan of UEA, Emir Al Thani of Qatar.
All dictators
All at least ambiguous towards Daech
All considered as key allies by the US
Yes he is.
That's why the Us don't even consider taking him out, putting someone else on the throne, someone who wouldn't gas his own people, pretending they were Daech jihadis while in fact they were kurds, enemies of Daech
Yes he is.
That's why the Us don't even consider taking him out, putting someone else on the throne, someone who wouldn't gas his own people, pretending they were Daech jihadis while in fact they were kurds, enemies of Daech