People... WAKE THE FUCK UP!

Look What Federal Agencies Have Ordered - Huge Amounts of Ammunition

I have received word that some people think that simply reporting on what the federal government is doing with our money, especially when it comes to purchases of ammunition on the domestic front that is in excess of a billion rounds within six months, is somehow sensationalizing the issue. That is not my intent. My intent is to inform and in that vein two very curious organizations have also purchased substantial amounts of ammunition.

However now we are discovering the Social Security Administration is requesting ammunition. Yes that’s right, The SSA is set to purchase 174,000 rounds of hollow point bullets that will be distributed to forty-one locations across the country. Those locations are listed in a spreadsheet at the FBO website. A solicitation posted by the SSA on the FedBizOpps website asks for contractors to supply 174,000 rounds of “.357 Sig 125 grain bonded jacketed hollow point pistol ammunition.”

While we can speculate all day long what in the world the SSA needs weapons and ammunition for, it is even more interesting to find that the National Weather Service is also purchasing ammunition. That’s right, the NWS put in a request for 46,000 rounds of hollow points and 500 paper targets.

According to a solicitation that appears on the FBO website the federal organization:

16,000 rounds of ammunition for semiautomatic pistols to be factory-loaded .40 S&W caliber, 180-grain jacketed hollow point (JHP).

8,000 rounds to: Ross Lane DOC, NOAA, NMFS, OLE, NED 130 Oak Street, Suite 5, Ellsworth, ME, 04605

24,000 rounds of ammunition for semiautomatic pistols to be factory-loaded .40 S&W caliber, 180-grain jacketed hollow point (JHP).

6,000 rounds of frangible, 125-grain CFRHT .40 caliber.

LI 004, 500 Transtar II blue 24″ x 40″ paper targets to locations below:

200 paper targets to: Ross Lane DOC, NOAA, NMFS, OLE, NED 130 Oak Street, Suite 5 Ellsworth, ME, 04605

200 paper targets to: Troy Audyatis DOC, NOAA, NMFS, OLE, NED 53 North 6th Street, Room 214 New Bedford, MA, 02740.

100 paper targets to: James Cassin DOC, NOAA, NMFS, OLE, NED 3350 Highway 138, Suite 218, Wall, NJ, 07719, 500, Items;


Some will make the argument that the targets are disproportionate to the ammo. That is true in a sense, but if you figure on putting a couple of full magazines in each target, then it works out. However, if that is all this is for then why not purchase ammo to carry as well? Furthermore why does this federal agency need it in the first place?

The National Weather Service is one of six agencies that make up the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
NOAA spokesman Scott Smullen emailed a statement to the Washington Post that read: Due to a clerical error in the federal business vendor process, a solicitation for ammunition and targets for the NOAA Fisheries Office of Law Enforcement mistakenly identified NOAA’s National Weather Service as the requesting office. The error is being fixed and will soon appear correctly in the electronic federal bidding system. The ammunition is standard issue for many law enforcement agencies and it will be used by 63 NOAA enforcement agents in their twice annual target qualifications and training.

In addition to that WAPO reports,
NWS spokesman Chris Vaccaro said the ammunition is not for the NWS. And, in fact, despite the fact the solicitation says NWS “requires” the ammunition, the same solicitation indicates the ammunition is to be delivered to the “NMFS” – which stands for National Marine Fisheries Service. Like the NWS, NMFS is housed under the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

What NMFS is doing with the ammunition is another question. It may support its law enforcement function, described by NOAA accordingly:
NOAA’s Office of Law Enforcement is dedicated to enforcing laws that conserve and protect our nation’s living marine resources and their natural habitat. Our goal is to assure that the many people who enjoy these resources for recreation or rely on them for business follow the rules that will maintain the species for future generations.
NOAA’s Office of Law Enforcement protects fish stocks from depletion and marine mammals from extinction. We also protect the livelihoods of commercial fishers, the hobbies of recreational fishers, and the health of seafood consumers.

Again, I understand training. I really do. I understand you can go through ammunition fast, but seriously, does the Social Security Administration or the National Marine Fisheries Service need guns, let alone ammunition? As of yet there is no explanation from either agency as to why the people working for them need any of this.

UPDATE: From and informed reader who was kind enough to provide extra info on these orders (Thanks Mike):

LE officers of these agencies have to practice and qualify with the same round that they carry. We want them to be proficient with these weapons, so they should be able to be practice.
The way that ammunition is bid out is generally for a five year period, with a lock-in on the price (good financial sense) and with number of rounds that is the maximum they can purchase at that price.

In reality, they seldom, if ever, purchase the maximum number of rounds allowed in the contract. Take a small agency with, let’s say, 20 officer’s in the LE Inspector General (IG) office.

Let’s say they practice 100 a month or 1200 rounds a year.
1200 times 20 is 24,000 rounds. Now, multiply that by 5 years and that is 120,000 rounds.
That is just for practice and qualification. They should have some extra on hand, too.
20 LE officers need 120,000 rounds?!?!? Yes, when you work out the numbers over five years.
Now, expand that to DHS — Secret Service, Coast Guard, Border Patrol, Customs and Immigration agents and more. There are ten’s of thousands of them. Over five years, it would easily run into the millions of rounds.

Don’t get me wrong….our government is bloated. It is not headed in direction I think it should be.

Read more: http://freedomoutpost.com/2012/08/l...red-huge-amounts-of-ammunition/#ixzz2I6XoXBGD
 
So basically... they (the government) can buy as much as they "need". But we common citizens are told we will be limited as to how much ammo we can buy.

It's fucked up people! When are you going to get it through your thick fucking skulls?
 
Double freaking post...
 

Mayhem

Banned
I haven't read any mention about regulations on how much ammo a citizen can buy.

And a decent reloading bench makes this all a moot point anyway.
 
Yeah. This has been dealt with. Your hysteria is unwarranted.

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2012/09/04/ap-debunks-daily-caller-op-ed-warning-of-obama/189732

It didn't take long for the Internet to start buzzing with conspiracy theories after the Social Security Administration posted a notice that it was purchasing 174,000 hollow-point bullets.

Why is the agency that provides benefits to retirees, disabled workers, widows and children stockpiling ammunition? Whom are they going to use it on?

"It's not outlandish to suggest that the Social Security Administration is purchasing the bullets as part of preparations for civil unrest," the website Infowars.com said.

Another website, The Daily Caller, said the bullets must be for use against American citizens, "since the SSA has never been used overseas to help foreign countries maintain control of their citizens."

The clamor became such a distraction for the agency that it dedicated a website to explaining the purchase. The explanation, it turns out, isn't as tantalizing as an arms buildup to defend against unruly senior citizens.

The bullets are for Social Security's office of inspector general, which has about 295 agents who investigate Social Security fraud and other crimes, said Jonathan L. Lasher, the agency's assistant IG for external relations.

The agents carry guns and make arrests - 589 last year, Lasher said. They execute search warrants and respond to threats against Social Security offices, employees and customers.

Agents carry .357 caliber pistols, Lasher said. The bullets, which add up to about 590 per agent, are for the upcoming fiscal year. Most will be expended on the firing range.

Discussed here:
http://metabunk.org/threads/599-Deb...n-40-caliber-bullets-for-use-in-America/page2

Described here:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/ssabullets.asp

Intentions listed here:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/17/social-security-administration-bullets_n_1797069.html
 

alaredo

Banned
@sam fisher Im glad that you are posting on this subject... Gun Owndership was always something that was part of our american right. Now it is just slowly being stripped one new law at a time. Subservient Sheeple who see this as ok have done nothing more than allow the other sheeple, the media and the government dumb them down. It seems that nobody wants to listen to the facts. Once people hear someone say that an assualt type of rifle was not used in the shooting, based on many witnesses and the video of police removing it from the trunk of the car, they seem to refuse to listen to that. No one wants to believe that. Yet the accusation of that being the weapon of choice at sandy hook is what led to the proposed gun ban in the first place. If that gun was NOT used, then I still wonder why people cant see what is really going on here.

It is not ANY FIREARM that makes someone lethal, it is their mentality. More people are killed in the united states every year by hammers than by rifles....
And that is a rifle of any kind; bolt action, assault style, internal magazine, etc...
That even includes suicides and the people who were killed by a rifle in law enforcements' hands.
Its not the issue of Sandy Hook everyone.... The issue here, is this is being used as a basis, even filled with false information, for the government wanting these types of guns out of the hands of citizens. Not because they are a legitimate threat.
So the question then becomes, why is the government so damn interested in limiting our rights on this matter.

I also cannot get my head around the fact that people are ok with limiting our second amendment right. The argument I get most is that when this was written, that muzzle loaders were the only guns available at the time...
Well this (The Second Amendment) was written, to preserve americans rights to own the same technology in weaponry as the military.

The other thing that worries me about most peoples' response to this, and that it is ok for them if this gun ban happens, is that you people specifically seem to believe that the rest of the amendments cannot be messed with. This is just the first step in losing all freedom. You are no longer free people. These are ALL suposedly "inalienable" rights...
Yet they are being manipulated. Ignore that the second amendment is about firearms... Think of it as a basic right... It was not written as a priveledge. It was written as a RIGHT! How important are, the abolishment of slavery and Women's right to vote, to everyone? If you are ok with the second amendment being manipulated, then I hope you are ok with the rest of the amendments being manipulated. You should be either 'all in," or "all out."
No grey area... you should be just black and white on this subject.
People with alot of grey area in their behavior are the dangerous one to our rights. People need to know what they are getting, stop with the wishy washy behavior. You people who act in that matter are acting like our polititions.

Like SAM FISHER said..... WAKE THE FUCK UP!
 

Mayhem

Banned

590 per agent. Holy Shit! Sam's Right!! WE NEED TO WAKE THE FUCK UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!










......And quit being so stingy with these people's ammo budget. For fucks sake, there was a time when we supported our law enforcement agencies. And there was a time when the Right-wing took pride in how they supported them. But not anymore, right Sammy?
 
revolution%20usa%20ron%20paul%201920x1200%20wallpaper_wallpaperbeautiful_94.jpg

Because the ones that are claiming tha Obama'sdictator are to pussy to have a real revolution
 
......And quit being so stingy with these people's ammo budget. For fucks sake, there was a time when we supported our law enforcement agencies. And there was a time when the Right-wing took pride in how they supported them. But not anymore, right Sammy?

Well now that they've figured out that they can use the idea that all law enforcement agencies are incompetent as ammo (HAH! PUN!) for their arguments regarding gun control, they're going to use it.
 
Top