paremts denied custody of Hitler amd his sisters

Namreg

Banned
more crazy americans:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-10891733
Adolf Hitler Campbell, 4, and his sisters, JoyceLynn Aryan Nation, 3, and Honszlynn Hinler Jeannie, 2, were taken from their New Jersey home in 2009.

The case first came to public attention in December 2008 after a shop refused to decorate a birthday cake for Adolf.
 
You know, I don't care what your beliefs are; but you have to be the dumbest person in the world to name your child Adolf Hitler. The Hitler family won't even go by that name so why would you try to ruin your son's life.
 
crazy paremts! they both have physical and mental deficiencies i got the mental ones from the kids names but i wonder what's physically wrong
 
Kind of like the name Saddam Hussein or Osama Bin Laden. Some people just ruin a otherwise not bad of a name by being bad.
 

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
here i go again thinking differently from all the " normal" people.

I don't care what their names are.
the GOVERNMENT better have a damn good reason for taking someones children away from them.
thats serious shit.

The panel found that the parents, who both suffer from unspecified physical and psychological disabilities, had "recklessly created a risk of serious injury to their children by failing to protect the children from harm and failing to acknowledge and treat their disabilities".

that is very very vague.
you would think if the STATE of new jersey, which i can tell you first hand is one very fucked up state, is going to take away children from parents, especially in a publicised case, they would be a little more specific.

I don't know, the first thing most people think is "oh what crazy names".......
the first thing i think is " why did they take away the kids".........I hope its for more than their names.
 

LukeEl

I am a failure to the Korean side of my family
I heard that they are out looking for the best friends of those children: Benito Mussolini Taylor, and Pol Pot McGee.
 

Mayhem

Banned
here i go again thinking differently from all the " normal" people.

I don't care what their names are.
the GOVERNMENT better have a damn good reason for taking someones children away from them.
thats serious shit.

The panel found that the parents, who both suffer from unspecified physical and psychological disabilities, had "recklessly created a risk of serious injury to their children by failing to protect the children from harm and failing to acknowledge and treat their disabilities".

that is very very vague.
you would think if the STATE of new jersey, which i can tell you first hand is one very fucked up state, is going to take away children from parents, especially in a publicised case, they would be a little more specific.

I don't know, the first thing most people think is "oh what crazy names".......
the first thing i think is " why did they take away the kids".........I hope its for more than their names.

This is another time when your points are well taken .......but.....

I'm originally from Joisey too, and I 2nd that it's a fucked up state. But, I could make the case that the names themselves are a danger to the child. Do you really think that li'l Adolph won't get his ass kicked every day just because of his name? He will. Right, wrong or indifferent doesn't matter in Joisey. I fear for these children if steps aren't taken.
 

PlasmaTwa2

The Second-Hottest Man in my Mother's Basement
I fear that with a middle name like Aryan Nation, she is going to grow up into a lesbian and become a walking paradox.
 
I've always said that I'm gonna name my first son Joseph Stalin Bird. Kinda has a nice ring to it, don't you think?
 

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
This is another time when your points are well taken .......but.....

I'm originally from Joisey too, and I 2nd that it's a fucked up state. But, I could make the case that the names themselves are a danger to the child. Do you really think that li'l Adolph won't get his ass kicked every day just because of his name? He will. Right, wrong or indifferent doesn't matter in Joisey. I fear for these children if steps aren't taken.

Ok, i agree that the names are or may be an indication that the parents may be unfit to raise the children.
An indication.
I , again knowing how messed up NJ is, especially the dyfs crew, would like to know more reasons as to why this happened.

I wouldn't be surprised in the least bit if the names are the actual cause and the other stuff that they won't tell us is non existent or exaggerated.

Of course these people aren't gonna get much backing from anyone, even most lawyers would probably back off.
but like i said if the GOV is gonna take away a child/children they better have a little more reason than the names of the children to do it.
And if they do, tell us.
them not giving reasons why publically to me is an indication of something being rotten in denmark.
 

Mayhem

Banned
Ok, i agree that the names are or may be an indication that the parents may be unfit to raise the children.
An indication.
I , again knowing how messed up NJ is, especially the dyfs crew, would like to know more reasons as to why this happened.

I wouldn't be surprised in the least bit if the names are the actual cause and the other stuff that they won't tell us is non existent or exaggerated.

Of course these people aren't gonna get much backing from anyone, even most lawyers would probably back off.
but like i said if the GOV is gonna take away a child/children they better have a little more reason than the names of the children to do it.
And if they do, tell us.
them not giving reasons why publically to me is an indication of something being rotten in denmark.

Yeah, but just because something makes the news, it doesn't mean it's any of our business. It's the kids welfare that's imortant, not our need to know. In Joisey though, everything is rotten in Denmark. I don't blame you at all for being suspicious.
 
here i go again thinking differently from all the " normal" people.

I don't care what their names are.
the GOVERNMENT better have a damn good reason for taking someones children away from them.
thats serious shit.

The panel found that the parents, who both suffer from unspecified physical and psychological disabilities, had "recklessly created a risk of serious injury to their children by failing to protect the children from harm and failing to acknowledge and treat their disabilities".

that is very very vague.
you would think if the STATE of new jersey, which i can tell you first hand is one very fucked up state, is going to take away children from parents, especially in a publicised case, they would be a little more specific.

I don't know, the first thing most people think is "oh what crazy names".......
the first thing i think is " why did they take away the kids".........I hope its for more than their names.

I agree completely. After all it is a free country. While I do not personally disagree with these names, who gives anyone the right what to name / not name my children?
 

Rey C.

Racing is life... anything else is just waiting.
Not that hard to find the details. From GoogleNews:
The court said that Heath Campbell has never held a job because of medical and psychological disabilities, and cannot read, while wife Deborah Campbell also had mental and physical problems.

Social workers were sent to investigate in December 2008 after it was reported “that the children were being strapped and confined for unusual amounts of time within the home in child booster seats and that domestic violence occurred in the home,” the court said. (ANI)

If I'm not mistaken, these are the same fruitloops who were in the news awhile back because they demanded that a supermarket make them a birthday cake for baby Adolf - and the supermarket told them to go pound sand.

But you know what's ironic (if not cruelly funny) about these people? Under the Nazis, they would have both been sent to camps or institutions where they would have both been castrated/sterilized. Mentally retarded people, who don't work and can't read & write are some of the last people Hitler wanted squirting out babies. They're pitiful though. It's like reading a story about two chickens naming their chick "Colonel Sanders". :facepalm:
 

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
Not that hard to find the details. From GoogleNews:


If I'm not mistaken, these are the same fruitloops who were in the news awhile back because they demanded that a supermarket make them a birthday cake for baby Adolf - and the supermarket told them to go pound sand.

But you know what's ironic (if not cruelly funny) about these people? Under the Nazis, they would have both been sent to camps or institutions where they would have both been castrated/sterilized. Mentally retarded people, who don't work and can't read & write are some of the last people Hitler wanted squirting out babies. They're pitiful though. It's like reading a story about two chickens naming their chick "Colonel Sanders". :facepalm:

still not good enough.
anything can be reported by anybody.
but they probably did do something that warranted the removal of the children.
I just wonder what that was..
like i said , i know NJ.
 
Top