A Possible Safe (and Legal) Alternative to Prostitution?
As everyone know, prostitution has long been a complicated and difficult issue for decades and still remains ******* in most of the "civilized" world, against all standards of free market ideals supposedly embraced by the power elites.
With social advancement crawling in this regard, I propose to institutionalize a system of legal rental of the organs and appendages of free individuals.
Thus, if one were caught in, say, a sting on a handjob joint, one could honestly claim not to have been involved in illicit acts, but merely to have been "renting the tightly closed fist of Thai masseuse to masturbate" oneself.
Or, when rousted in a back alley, (and who hasn't been!) one could rightly claim to have been lawfully "leasing the rectal cavity of this fine individual for the purposes of ejaculating semen, a necessary and healthy biological function."
Since the staunchest social conservatives define sex as solely for the purposes of procreation, the activity could not even be termed sex, which would lower the risk of transmission and contraction of STDs.
What do you think? Would you support this modest proposal?
As everyone know, prostitution has long been a complicated and difficult issue for decades and still remains ******* in most of the "civilized" world, against all standards of free market ideals supposedly embraced by the power elites.
With social advancement crawling in this regard, I propose to institutionalize a system of legal rental of the organs and appendages of free individuals.
Thus, if one were caught in, say, a sting on a handjob joint, one could honestly claim not to have been involved in illicit acts, but merely to have been "renting the tightly closed fist of Thai masseuse to masturbate" oneself.
Or, when rousted in a back alley, (and who hasn't been!) one could rightly claim to have been lawfully "leasing the rectal cavity of this fine individual for the purposes of ejaculating semen, a necessary and healthy biological function."
Since the staunchest social conservatives define sex as solely for the purposes of procreation, the activity could not even be termed sex, which would lower the risk of transmission and contraction of STDs.
What do you think? Would you support this modest proposal?
