Obama: Lose or Be Impeached!

[Will E Worm]

Obama: Lose or Be Impeached!

" ... Obama’s loss of nerve and decision to call off a military strike that could have taken out the Benghazi insurgents, and instead—just letting Americans die an agonizing, lonely death—is the most quintessential aspect of the story. This is because it reveals Barack as he truly is inside—an immoral, gutless, unfeeling, selfish, hypocritical, overly ambitious and hideously uncaring person. Obama ONLY cares about what he personally finds valuable, which obviously does not include individual Americans, or any random human beings."
SOURCE

The quote above s from a piece by Kelly O’Connell published originally at Canada Free Press

O'Connell goes on to say: " Barack is a self-centered, utterly unfeeling, revolution-seeking drone who cannot be bothered with the hard work of genuine leadership. And as terrifying as it sounds, he is a typical Marxist leader who wants to “save humanity,” but finds individuals not important enough to consider. It’s no wonder Barack’s White House loves Mao, a possible role model for crazy, unthinking and ideologically-driven tyranny from the man who murdered 77 million of his own countrymen. Or perhaps Vlad Lenin, first dictator of the USSR is his example, who said—“Any cook should be able to run the country.” Marxists have no respect for democracy, republicanism or capitalism.

Whatever the purpose of Barack’s presidency, he must face the decision of getting beaten at the ballot box in November 2012 or being impeached. Yes America, it has finally come to that after Barack’s murderous high treason!"

O'Connell is a "must read" article. If you don't read anything else today please read this insightful article at Canada Free Press.

It seems clear that with less than a week to go before the Presidential Election, the electorate is extremely upset and deeply concerned over the incident in Benghazi, Libya, and the conduct of our Commander-in-Chief, his administration, and yes, the leftist Mainstream Media in America who tried -- with all their might -- to cover-up "the cover-up." But truth has a way of digging itself to the top no matter how deeply buried.

Articles of Impeachment should be drawn-up -- forthwith -- for President Barack Hussein Obama in the event that America has truly lost its mind and reelects the exposed Marxist to power on Tuesday, November 6th.

I would like an answer to my question (posed days ago) as to WHAT, exactly was going on that was so covert, so secret, that it was worth the lives of four Americans left to be slaughtered by blood thirsty terrorists. I am still inclined to believe that the US was covertly running guns for Libya to the Syrian rebels through Turkey. At this point it is only a theory on my part as I cannot confirm it.

This is just one of the myriad of questions just hanging out there waiting -- begging -- for answers.

Again, we need a congressional investigation to drag the people responsible out into the light, force them to answer, and if we learn laws have been broken -- then the appropriate punishment should be meted out.


The Obama Administration has played fast and loose with the constitution since day one of their regime. It is long past time they be called to account.

I'm not a clairvoyant. I have no crystal ball, and even if I did -- I wouldn't have a clue how to use it. I say all this to say -- I haven't a clue who will win the election. BUT -- if Obama wins, he'd better prepare himself for a scathing, penetrating, investigation of him, and of his administration, unlike any ever seen in the history of this country. Even if Obama loses, the investigation should go forward. We need to learn WHAT happened and WHY. We need to learn if laws were broken and by whom.

Meanwhile, Obama takes cover from the Benghazi storm by submerging himself in the storm that struck New England a few days ago. Anything to draw the public's attention away from his callous conduct, which MAY include high crimes and misdemeanors, which are constitutional grounds for impeachment.

I have a feeling that when the truth finally comes out, as it surely will, it will make "Fast and Furious" resemble a Sunday School picnic.

America! Get a grip! Reclaim your common sense and go to the polls next Tuesday and rescue America from the clutches of our current Marxist regime before they can utterly destroy our constitution and enslave three hundred million Americans.

If you need a little extra incentive, just remember -- if Obama is reelected there is a strong possibility that he will be able to appoint at least two new justices to the US Supreme Court. NOW do you see the immanent danger to the US Constitution?

If you cherish freedom, if you want your children to live and breath free, then you can't sit this one out.

That oft-quoted British statesman Edmund Burke warned us clearly: "Evil flourishes when good men do nothing." Neither goodness, freedom, or liberty have the luxury of doing nothing. It is a constant struggle just to preserve them. Our most powerful weapon is the ballot. Next Tuesday is our chance to strike a blow for freedom and liberty by sending Mr.Obama and his minions home.

© J. D. Longstreet

J. D. Longstreet is a conservative Southern American (A native sandlapper and an adopted Tar Heel) with a deep passion for the history, heritage, and culture of the southern states of America. At the same time he is a deeply loyal American believing strongly in "America First".· He is a thirty-year veteran of the broadcastingbusiness, as an "in the field" and "on-air" news reporter (contributing to radio, TV, and newspapers) and a conservative broadcast commentator.
Longstreet is a veteran of the US Army and US Army Reserve. He is a member of the American Legion and the Sons of Confederate Veterans.· A lifelong Christian, Longstreet subscribes to "old Lutheranism" to express and exercise his faith.
Articles by J.D. Longstreet are posted at: "INSIGHT on Freedom",· "Hurricane Alley... by Longstreet",· "The Carolina Post" and numerous other conservative websites around the web.·

Article

 

[Will E Worm]

Benghazi, Libya—Biopsy From a Malignant, Failed Presidency

Whatever happened to Barack the world’s smartest leader and incomparable statesman? Those days are gone forever. Instead, it would be impossible to catalog the staggering list of ill-advised, mistaken, foolish, naive and utterly inane decisions by Obama and his administration. So, instead—let us use a single Obama catastrophe, the events of Libya—to critique and symbolize his failed tenure. This is reasonable because every bad Barack habit and evil instinct is represented in this new American disaster.

In the November 2012 presidential election, America is given an opportunity almost no other country suffering under tyranny is offered—the chance to wake-up and toss out a despot before he fatally damages our noble Republic. Let us pray Americans will cast aside sentimentality and act as true patriots and save America from a crafty and utterly immoral, power-mad demagogue. For if Libya is not a wake up call for the average American, we may not be able to stop the implosion. But we must believe we can halt the rot if we act now.

I. Benghazi
It is obvious now that a tremendous and sadly avoidable tragedy struck Americans in Benghazi, Libya on the anniversary of 9/11. Has such a deadly lack of leadership ever emanated from the White House? Further, what impact will such brutal official indifference make upon the American psyche if this event is not harshly sanctioned at the voting booth?

A. Benghazi 9/11 Overview
Here is a brief description of what we know: US Ambassador Christopher Stevens traveled from Tripoli to Benghazi, Libya. Nervous over rising unrest in this Muslim African Mediterranean nation, Stevens asked repeatedly for more security but was refused. On the day of the attack he’d asked again. He was attacked after dark, and seven hours later he was dead, along with three others. And it now appears the US had notice of the event, time to respond, and resources within reach to mount a counter-assault. What is not clear is why the American military was not sent in to save our Ambassador. (The time-line of the attack is well laid out at Powerline. (Benghazigate: The state of the story)


B. Benghazi Obama Problems
But let’s recall some of the more unsavory elements of the Benghazi charade. The killing of Stevens occurred on September 11, 2012 after 9 pm. As we now know, the attack was prep-planned terrorism, not the result of any video protest, as the White House (WH) initially claimed. The assault pitted a large group of terrorists against a few Americans and some Libyan security guards, who fled almost immediately. Four Americans were killed.

After much WH disinformation, we now know a great deal of damning information about what actually happened (key video): The fight raged for 7 hours; the WH knew there was no video protest; Ambassador Stevens asked repeatedly for more security, including the day of the attack; the WH had a live feed for 5 hours of the firefight; there was a CIA safe house 1 mile down the road; A nearby US base was 480 miles away—Sigonella Naval Air Station in Sicily, Italy; Former Navy SEALS at the nearby (1 mile) CIA annex asked three times if they could help Stevens and were told repeatedly to “stand down”; several agents finally volunteered to aid Stevens and ended up dying; that a Delta Force Team, designated a secret tier-one counter-terrorism team, was at Sigonella, at most 2 hours away; a US Military AC-130h-Specter Gunship was already in Benghazi but not sent to rescue Stevens (gunships mission: “close air support, air interdiction and armed reconnaissance”); that a strike was organized, the terrorists located, but the mission canceled when Barack did not have the nerve to pull the trigger.

It is undoubtedly worse than Obama simply turned his back on cornered American citizens in a foreign land, knowing undoubtedly they would die. But that Barack did so without any compelling reason—except political—is beyond evil. Only a moral monster would have made that decision when it was within his powers to possibly save them with almost no effort of his own.

II. Libya: Muslim Spring
Without Obama’s Muslim Spring policy, Benghazi probably never would have happened (Muslim Spring being the new American approach to using foreign rebels to wage war for liberty against dictators with American backing). So how did Barack’s Muslim Spring conversion take place? Actually, and against all of Barack’s claims of being a guileless freedom fighter—it was originally all about money, oil and power. Europeans wanted Obama to join anti-Gaddafi forces during the rebel uprising to help defend their oil interests, as Libya is Europe’s biggest supplier of petroleum. Barack did not want to be left out, seemingly standing for nothing again while mouthing empty cliches, as he had been before in Iran.

Typically, after what Barack felt was a successful campaign to oust Gaddafi, he took credit for the strategy. This is a longstanding habit (noted when he rode other legislator’s bills in the Illinois senate, despite having nothing to do with them). Writes one journalist in June 2011:

From Washington, the enthusiasm of the French for intervention in Libya is seen with a mixture of relief and puzzlement. The Americans do not want the job and are happy that someone else does. Indeed, President Nicolas Sarkozy’s willingness to intervene helped close a dangerous gap between the world of “values,” which would call for direct American intervention against Muammar al-Qaddafi, and the world of “interest,” which impelled President Barack Obama to restraint.

While Americans are relieved by France’s display of determination, they cannot refrain from expressing a sense of bemusement: Do the French really know what they are up against? What has happened to them? We know what war means, but they seem to have forgotten! Indeed, France and the United States seem to have switched roles from just a few years ago.

Sadly, Barack takes his own brand of “leadership” so seriously, and with the novelist’s joy for embellishment, that soon Europe’s Libyan intervention became another seed of his genius. Obama’s fiction of Libyan leadership was glorified in Vanity Fair in a silly panegyric called Obama’s Way. One weirdly effusive excerpt notes how Barack decided how the Libyan war would unfold:

A decision Barack Obama had made, more or less on his own. The president’s decision reached forward into the impersonal future—Qaddafi would be killed, Libya would hold its first free elections—but it also reached back into the personal past, to the things that had made Obama capable of walking alone into a room with a pencil and walking out a bit later with a conviction….He was especially alive to the power of a story to influence the American public. He believed he had been elected chiefly because he had told a story. Now the United States had forged a broad international coalition to help people who claimed to share our values rid themselves of a tyrant.

III. Bad Habits & Evil Intentions
A. Lessons of Barack—Leaderless

What can we learn about Barack just from his Libya fiasco? There are many lessons, actually. And they all lead to the realization that Obama is a typical Marxist—dishonest, unethical, and utterly ruthless. First, when it comes to crises—Obama is a reactor, not a true leader. For example, it took France to push him into action against Gaddafi, which he then characteristically claimed showed him to be the majordomo. Yet—if he really was a principled leader, unafraid to stand up to a bully—then why no action when Iran’s people protested the faked elections, rioted and were murdered?

The Obama’s Way article went so far as to claim the profound Barack deferred to philosophers and statesmen in framing his response:

Obama asked his speechwriters to dig up for him writings about war by people he admired: Saint Augustine, Churchill, Niebuhr, Gandhi, King. He wanted to reconcile the non-violent doctrines of two of his heroes, King and Gandhi, with his new role in the violent world. These writings came back to the speechwriters with key passages underlined and notes by the president to himself scrawled in the margin.

But instead, fraudulent Barack was again simply Leading From Behind. This is the only type of “leadership” with which Barack feels an affinity.

B. Cowering & Heartless
Second, as Libya has now come apart, Barack reveals his real persona. This is the uncaring, craftily ambitious, inexperienced yet know-it-all poseur. But, when storm clouds mount he is so unnerved by making big decisions he sprints to the sand to bury his head. This can be seen the way Obama reacted to the Gulf Oil Spill. His most memorable maneuver, after lecturing oil companies on safety, was golf. Bill Clinton offered more leadership suggesting we nuke the offending undersea oil gusher.

C. Hypocritical & Soulless Politician
Third, Obama’s loss of nerve and decision to call off a military strike that could have taken out the Benghazi insurgents, and instead—just letting Americans die an agonizing, lonely death—is the most quintessential aspect of the story. This is because it reveals Barack as he truly is inside—an immoral, gutless, unfeeling, selfish, hypocritical, overly ambitious and hideously uncaring person. Obama ONLY cares about what he personally finds valuable, which obviously does not include individual Americans, or any random human beings.

D. Bizarre Shrunken Adolescent POTUS
We must admit in passing how weird it is to watch Barack devolve from his 2008 pseudo-statesman routine into his new disrespectful, perverted and immature persona. Undoubtedly this suits him better as it cuts closer to the bone.

IV. Why Obama Bailed on Benghazi
How about a few suggestions as to Obama’s motivations in Benghazi? Why would Barack not give his ambassador Chris Stevens security when he repeatedly asked for more and apparently danger grew daily? Because this would go against Barack’s adolescent king-of-the-world fantasy which claimed he came in peace to heal the earth.

But when the WH and Pentagon could see live video that our ambassador in Libya was getting murdered, why wouldn’t Barack go in with military when he had the means easily within reach? And why would he cancel the military response after it was organized? Most probably because he believed it could escalate into something huge which would go against his peace-maker narrative. This would imperil his upcoming election. Instead, Obama decided to sentence 4 men to execution, betting he could cover up the small murder by blaming it on another—Barack’s MO—with a hack video. He expected the media would undoubtedly help him with the coverup—as they subsequently tried—and sweep him back into power. But since this failed, all bets are off.

A. Moral Caner of Pragmatism
Ultimately, Benghazi is a triumph of Barack’s famed pragmatism, where only the outcome matters, and anything that helps achieve the goal—like murder by abandonment, in this case—is considered ethical.

Conclusion—Obama’s Choices: Lose or Be Impeached
Barack is a self-centered, utterly unfeeling, revolution-seeking drone who cannot be bothered with the hard work of genuine leadership. And as terrifying as it sounds, he is a typical Marxist leader who wants to “save humanity,” but finds individuals not important enough to consider. It’s no wonder Barack’s White House loves Mao, a possible role model for crazy, unthinking and ideologically-driven tyranny from the man who murdered 77 million of his own countrymen. Or perhaps Vlad Lenin, first dictator of the USSR is his example, who said—“Any cook should be able to run the country.” Marxists have no respect for democracy, republicanism or capitalism.

Whatever the purpose of Barack’s presidency, he must face the decision of getting beaten at the ballot box in November 2012 or being impeached. Yes America, it has finally come to that after Barack’s murderous high treason!

Article

 

[zeeblofowl_1969]

Way to over inflate and bang a non issue. If that's all you have it's pathetic.

 

[Zolf J. Kimbly]

J. D. Longstreet is a conservative Southern American (A native sandlapper and an adopted Tar Heel) with a deep passion for the history, heritage, and culture of the southern states of America.

Credibility was lost as soon as I read that

The Zolfster can think of another reason or two why this guy is frothing at the mouth about Barry O sitting in the white house.

 

[Johan]

The election's not even done and these guys already want to impeach Obama, what a joke !
Republicans will never fail making me hilarious

 

[Will E Worm]

Way to over inflate and bang a non issue. If that's all you have it's pathetic.

This is a real issue. If this was Bush you would have been all over it.

Credibility was lost as soon as I read that

The Zolfster can think of another reason or two why this guy is frothing at the mouth about Barry O sitting in the white house.

Stop being racist and stop assuming so much. You do not know him. There are two articles.

 

[Red Spyder]

This is not an issue for those who are still drinking the Kool Aid. But for those of us who pay attention, it shows the lack of spine and self delusion of our current empty suit commander in chief.

I mean, an American ambassador gets murdered abroad for the first time since the late 70's and that's not news? It's not important to know what led to that? A non-issue? The fact that the mainstream media has been avoiding to cover this story tells me just how biased they are in favor of Hussein (from now on I'm calling the CIC by his middle name, just like I do with Mr. Mittens) and it's up to the new media who are not his lapdogs to cover it and raise questions about it. And, yes, if the CIC or someone in his administration ordered reinforcements to stand down, there must definetly be some kind of punishment. I mean, wouldn't you guys on the left demand the same if it had been Bush? And of course, if anyone in Bush's administration had fumbled the ball that way, he would be taking the blame from all of you, so in that sense I am blaming Hussein for the death of the ambassador and those brave and heroic SEALs who died trying to save him.

 

[xfire]

Fuck you lying rightwing rat bastards. No one was ordered to stand down.

http://news.yahoo.com/detailed-acco...ck-response-020906681--abc-news-politics.html

Intelligence officials have disclosed a new detailed timeline of the attack on the American consulate in Benghazi, acknowledging the CIA played a greater role in responding to the attack than has previously been disclosed. A senior U.S. intelligence official also insisted that the CIA security team that initially responded to the attack was not given orders "to stand down in providing support," as had been suggested in media reports.

The timeline provided by a senior U.S. intelligence official gives the first precise account of how CIA security teams provided the first response to the Sept. 11 attack on the diplomatic mission in Benghazi, which killed four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens.

The attack has become a political hot potato in the presidential campaign, with conservatives accusing the administration of not being transparent. The State Department has previously released a detailed account of the night's events, but did not acknowledge a CIA role in the response. The timeline given by a senior Intelligence official confirms that the facility previously described by the State Department as an annex, was in fact, a facility housing CIA security officers. It does not provide any additional details on the current intelligence assessment that the attack was an opportunistic result of earlier protests that day outside the U.S. embassy in Cairo over an anti-Muslim movie.

The official says there was "no second guessing" of those on the ground in Libya by senior officials either in Libya or Washington.

"There were no orders to anybody to stand down in providing support," said the official. The official's comments appeared to be a direct rebuttal of a Fox News report that CIA teams on the ground had been told by superior officers to "stand down" from providing security support to the consulate.

According to the official, upon learning of the attack at the consulate, the security team at the annex responded "as quickly and effectively as possible." The official described how the security team tried to rally additional support from local Libyan forces and heavier weapons, but that when that could not be accomplished "within minutes" they moved out to the compound. The official called the security team "genuine heroes" who risked their lives to save those at the compound.

According to the new timeline the annex received a call at 9:40 p.m. local time that the consulate was coming under attack. A team of six CIA security operatives left the annex for the mission within 25 minutes of that call.

Over the next 25 minutes the security team approached the compound and attempted to secure heavy weapons. They encountered heavy enemy fire when they entered the consulate compound to locate Stevens and the other Americans who were there at the time of the attack.

At 11:11 p.m., an unarmed U.S. military surveillance drone arrived over the compound. U.S. officials have told ABC News that the drone had been redirected to Benghazi from an ongoing mission elsewhere in Libya.

By 11:30pm, all of the Americans, with the exception of the missing Stevens, had left the compound in vehicles that immediately came under fire.

The annex itself came under sporadic small arms and RPG fire for the next 90 minutes before the attackers eventually dispersed.

At around 1 a.m. an additional CIA team of about six security officers from the embassy in Tripoli had arrived at Benghazi. U.S. officials have acknowledged that the embassy in Tripoli had chartered an aircraft to take the team to Benghazi. The official disclosed the new detail that two U.S. military officers were part of the team that flew in from Tripoli.

Upon learning that the situation at the annex had calmed down, the team that came in from Tripoli initially wanted to focus their attention on locating Stevens, who had been taken to a local hospital.

When the team finally managed to secure transportation and an armed escort into Benghazi, they learned that Stevens "was almost certainly dead and that the security situation at the hospital was uncertain." At that point they headed to the annex to help evacuate the Americans located there .

They arrived at the annex at 5:15 a.m., just before mortar rounds begin to hit the complex. The attack killed two security officers, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods, who were located on the annex's roof. Doherty had been part of the security team that had flown in from Tripoli. The new attack on the annex lasted only 11 minutes.

Less than an hour later everyone at the annex was evacuated with the help of "a heavily armed Libyan military unit. "

 

[Mayhem]

It's worth re-electing Obama just for the way he makes Conservatives lose their last shred of dignity and integrity.

 

[Johan]

It's worth re-electing Obama just for the way he makes Conservatives lose their last shred of dignity and integrity.

Maybe Will, Sam, & Co. will shot themselves

That would be the best way they could use their beloved guns.

 

[zeeblofowl_1969]

This is a real issue. If this was Bush you would have been all over it.



Stop being racist and stop assuming so much. You do not know him. There are two articles.

Bush is guilty of crimes so numerous as to not be believed. I would not have to bang every little made up thing for your little ass puppet ex-president guys a crook plain and simple. Its a drum for you to bang even if you cannot prove crap. Bush??? Dude the guilt for that dip shit lays at your feet, biggest piece of shit EVER........

 

[StanScratch]

So even before election day has dawned, not only have you given up on your beloved Romney, but you cowards are already talking of impeachment? Instead of working to find ways to create jobs, keep jobs in the states, ensure our children get good educations so they can get better jobs, ensure healthy lifestyles for all, provide apt disaster relief, ensure that at least every other country in the world does not hate us, making sure our planet does not remain pissed at us, job equity for all workers no matter their race, religion, or sex...hell the list goes on. Instead of focusing on those things which would help our nation move forward, you fucking cowards are already talking about impeachment?
Fuck you, you little coward. Our nation would be so much better without your destructive ilk.

Maybe Will, Sam, & Co. will shot themselves

That would be the best way they could use their beloved guns.

Only if we can all watch on cam.

 

[Sam Fisher]

So even before election day has dawned, not only have you given up on your beloved Romney, but you cowards are already talking of impeachment? Instead of working to find ways to create jobs, keep jobs in the states, ensure our children get good educations so they can get better jobs, ensure healthy lifestyles for all, provide apt disaster relief, ensure that at least every other country in the world does not hate us, making sure our planet does not remain pissed at us, job equity for all workers no matter their race, religion, or sex...hell the list goes on. Instead of focusing on those things which would help our nation move forward, you fucking cowards are already talking about impeachment? Fuck you, you little coward. Our nation would be so much better without your destructive ilk.

Hmm.... all those things you mentioned were promised by Hussein when he was running in '08.

He failed!

 

[TheSpokenWheel]

Hmm.... all those things you mentioned were promised by Hussein when he was running in '08.

He failed!

He "failed" because people like you that managed to get elected openly united against him so he wouldn't be able to get anything done, you fucking dolt.

 

[Mayhem]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-boehlert/hyping-benghazi-madness-r_b_2065136.html

Excerpted because the people who need to read it the most can't take too many words.

But the bottomless anger doesn't match reality. Pressed about why Benghazi has become such a momentous touchstone, conservatives insist it's because Americans lives were lost and taken at the hands of terrorists. And they claim Obama reacted callously to the news. (The fact that he flew to a campaign fundraiser in Las Vegas the day after the attack has become a major Benghazi talking point.)

On September 20, 1984, there was a truck-bomb explosion at the U.S. embassy annex in Aukar, Lebanon, just outside Beirut. Twenty-four people were killed. It was third terrorist bombing aimed at U.S. interests in Lebanon in a year and a half.

What did Ronald Reagan do on September 21, 1984? He made three campaign appearances in Iowa.

The Associated Press report linked to above notes that Reagan was asked if he had considered canceling the campaign swing. Reagan replied: "We talked about that but realized that whether I'm there or here you're president wherever you are, and as fast as communication is on these matters, wherever I am."

*April 18, 1983: Bombing of U.S. Embassy in Beirut. Sixty-three people were killed, including 17 Americans.

*Oct. 23, 1983: Bombing of Marine barracks in Beirut. A suicide bomber blew detonated a truck full of explosives at a U.S. Marine barracks; Two hundred and forty-one U.S. Marines were killed.

* Sept. 20, 1984: Bombing of U.S. Embassy annex. In Aukar, northeast of Beirut, a truck bomb exploded outside the U.S. Embassy annex killing 24 people, two of whom were U.S. military personnel.

In less than 18 months under Reagan, more than 320 people were killed by terrorist attacks on the U.S. Embassy in and around Beirut. And after the third attack, which killed two Americans, Reagan refused to curtail his campaign for re-election (which he won in a rout) even for one day.

But today, the deaths of four Americans killed during the assault on the Libyan consulate has some conservatives demanding Obama be tried for treason.

There's nothing sane or rational about the right-wing's Benghazi fantasy and the role they have assigned for the president. But it does allow the conservative press to project their deepest fears up against the passions of the campaign season's final push.

 

[Bearded_Menace]

He "failed" because people like you that managed to get elected openly united against him so he wouldn't be able to get anything done, you fucking dolt.

I wish I could rep you for this. This is one issue that pissed me off to the highest level during these past 3 1/2 years. Regardless of if you like the president or not, your job should be working with him for compromise. Instead, a certain set of wing nuts took it upon themselves to embark on a mission to make him a one term president by not getting anything done regardless of the repercussions it would have on the country.



You know, if people gave enough of a fuck about what was really going on, this could be perceived as treason. I am all for taking a stand and shooting down bad ideas, but only if it is done in order to reach an agreeable compromise. This tells me that even if Obama came to you with the most problem solving idea in the history of man, you would shoot it down simply for political gain.

 

[darkwarrior3007]

I wish I could rep you for this. This is one issue that pissed me off to the highest level during these past 3 1/2 years. Regardless of if you like the president or not, your job should be working with him for compromise. Instead, a certain set of wing nuts took it upon themselves to embark on a mission to make him a one term president by not getting anything done regardless of the repercussions it would have on the country.



You know, if people gave enough of a fuck about what was really going on, this could be perceived as treason. I am all for taking a stand and shooting down bad ideas, but only if it is done in order to reach an agreeable compromise. This tells me that even if Obama came to you with the most problem solving idea in the history of man, you would shoot it down simply for political gain.

I said that it was treason the minute that assclown Mitch McConnell said that. He just admitted that they weren't even gonna do the jobs they were elected to do, but rather spend the entire time making life miserable for the President.

 

[The Yak]

It's worth re-electing Obama just for the way he makes Conservatives lose their last shred of dignity and integrity.

I can't rep you at the moment but I could not agree more. Should Obama win on Tuesday, I will delight in the fits of apoplectic rage and histrionic theatrics with which conservatives will respond.

 

[Sam Fisher]

And you FAIL!

He "failed" because people like you that managed to get elected openly united against him so he wouldn't be able to get anything done, you fucking dolt.

110th United States Congress - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/110th_United_States_Congress. The Democratic Party controlled a majority in both chambers for the first time .... their congressional majorities and Senator Barack Obama was elected President. ... These are partial lists of prominent enacted legislation and pending bills.
Major events - Major legislation - Treaties ratified - Select committees

 

[xfire]

The Democratic Party controlled a majority in both chambers

For a total of seven weeks out of two years. You're so easy to shoot down it borders on ridiculous.