I'm totally against nuke power. We need to use what we have sitting right below us, including that in Canada.
I'm in favor of nuclear energy. Using proven and safe naval nuclear technology at the county level would eliminate entirely the need to burn fossil fuels for electricity.
I'm totally against nuke power. We need to use what we have sitting right below us, including that in Canada.
I'm totally against nuke power. We need to use what we have sitting right below us, including that in Canada.
But you have no problem using it in weapons?
Uhh.... gee, when was the last time The United States used a nuke as a weapon?
Uhh.... gee, when was the last time The United States used a nuke as a weapon?
I realize that. My point was, having the nuclear material around is dangerous, so is your reason because of the danger of nuclear material, or just because mining and logging, etc. are industries that employ many people, and would provide more jobs then a nuke plant?
Only if it comes with a guarantee to do illegal testing on unsuspecting workers, I wanna see some MARVEL-type shit happening there.
Well, since we have an abundance of coal, natural gas, and oil right here under our feet, I think it would create more jobs here in the USA and, it would make us far less dependent on foreign oil, etc.
I am in favour if it's built well in a zone where there is little to no risk of natural disasters and used as an interim power supply until natural power supply (eg wave turbines) can take it's place.Would you be in favor or against if your goverment would like to build a new nuclear power plant?
Yes/no
View attachment 283368
Proven? Chernobyl? Bad management. Japan? There had been several warnings and small incidents before it happened. Nuclear is safe if you can handle it well, the question is, can you handle it well? Not even the Japanese could.I'm in favor of nuclear energy. Using proven and safe naval nuclear technology at the county level would eliminate entirely the need to burn fossil fuels for electricity.
:thumbsup: :iloveyou: :rofl:Only if it comes with a guarantee to do illegal testing on unsuspecting workers, I wanna see some MARVEL-type shit happening there.
Clever boy.On one hand I trust the technology, but on the other hand I don't trust Stormont enough to actually make it happen.
The U.S. army can't handle Iraq or Afghanistan. can they handle a 1st world country?Yes, but the waste generated by nuclear power plant is not risk-free and it will never disappear.
Tip; U.S Army can take control of Canada's oil ares if they do not sell it to you cheaply.![]()
TruesaybloodWhen it's handled safely, nuclear energy is the best way to produce cheap energy and it's much more cleaner than coal, oil or gas.
Smart man; showing independant thought. "Free trade" doesn't always produce the best results.Fair enough, but here's where I get a little iffy on the whole situation. We do have some of the highest quality natural resources, in abundance....but the companies sell them over seas, and import our oil and natural gas, then charge us unreasonable rates, while making record profits. I'm all for free enterprise, But some of these companies are just plain outright raping the American public.