Man's best friend could be one of the environment's worst enemies, according to a new study which says the carbon pawprint of a pet dog is more than double that of a gas-guzzling sports utility vehicle...
...Other ******* aren't much better for the environment, the Vales say.
Cats have an eco-footprint of about 0.15 hectares, slightly less than driving a Volkswagen Golf for a year, while two hamsters equates to a plasma television and even the humble goldfish burns energy equivalent to two mobile telephones.
Premium Link
Upgrade
Enough of this nonsense already!
The only footprints there should be is kicking these idiots out the door for useless studies as these!
And pets' environmental impact is not limited to their carbon footprint, as cats and dogs devastate wildlife, spread disease and pollute waterways, the Vales say.
Devastate wildlife? What about bears that knock down beehives, rips fish out of the water and feast on them, **** a camper or hiker... oh wait, that's rightm don't care about humans... scratch that. What about the bear that takes a dump in the woods? All that methane gas!
Not to mention all the other wild ******* out there that "devastate" wildlife, shits everywhere, and crosses the water with their
filthy ****** bodies!
Sheesh!
