Neighborhood protector or "Ghetto Trash" ?

[Johan]

Temar Boggs, Pennsylvania Teen, Saved Jocelyn Rojas, Abducted 5-Year-Old Girl

Minutes after Temar Boggs heard that 5-year-old Jocelyn Rojas had gone missing, he noticed a suspicious car careening in and out of the side streets of his neighborhood.

The 15-year-old was hanging out with his friends at an apartment in Lancaster, Penn. on Thursday afternoon when he heard the news. So he and another friend, Chris Garcia, took to their bikes to join the search for Rojas, according to Lancaster Online.

He told reporters that one car in particular caught his eye. It turned around at the top of a hill near Garcia's apartment, where several police officers were gathered. It began turning in and out of side streets in the neighborhood, which is known for its cul-de-sacs and dead ends.

Boggs gave chase on his bicycle. He got close enough to the vehicle to see a little girl inside. He made eye contact with the driver, an older white male, who apparently got spooked enough to let Rojas get out of the car.

"She runs to my arms and said, 'I need to see my mommy,'" Boggs said.

He escorted her to police, who reunited her with her relatives. The town is hailing him as a hero.

The suspect, described as a white male between 50 and 70 years old, is still on the loose, FOX 59 reports. He was driving a maroon car with round taillights, and wearing green shoes, green pants and a red-and-white striped shirt. He reportedly walked with a limp.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/15/temar-boggs-jocelyn-rojas_n_3597825.html

2 days after Zimmerman was found guilty. Coincidences, sometimes, can be awesome.
If you believe in God, you may interpret this as a sign of Him, showing you what's a real neighborhood hero

 

[Philbert]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/15/temar-boggs-jocelyn-rojas_n_3597825.html

2 days after Zimmerman was found guilty. Coincidences, sometimes, can be awesome.
If you believe in God, you may interpret this as a sign of Him, showing you what's a real neighborhood hero

You poor fool.
Many of us DO get it...you don't. Zim stopped something before it went down, and Temar did it after.
Both watching out for their neighbors.

 

[Johan]

You poor fool.
Many of us DO get it...you don't. Zim stopped something before it went down, and Temar did it after.
Both watching out for their neighbors.

5th amendment of the US Constitution
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

So, basically, even if Zimmerman actually stopped something before it happened, even if Trayvon was to commit a crime, Zimmerman violated the US Constitution

 

[Philbert]

5th amendment of the US Constitution
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

So, basically, even if Zimmerman actually stopped something before it happened, even if Trayvon was to commit a crime, Zimmerman violated the US Constitution

Explain how Zim did that.

 

[Johan]

He acted as if he knew that Trayvon was looking for trouble...

 

[Mr. Daystar]

He acted as if he knew that Trayvon was looking for trouble...

He fucking acted, AFTER Martin beat him in the fucking head!!!

You say a A LOT of shit on this board, I might not like most of it, I might think you're a dumb fuck, but I don't act in a physical way. I don't bitch slap you, and if I did, you would have the right to defend yourself against it...yet every post I see, made by you, I assume will be more of your stupidity....I'm usually right, but I don't respond until I read it, because you have on occasion made a valid point, or one I agree with. I wait, and I make sure I'm right. You don't understand this, because you've never been in a situation, that could have turned real bad, real quick. Martin made a choice, and he paid for it. The world whimpered and bitched, and got their way, and now they're whimpering, and bitching because they don't like the way it turned out. The only way ANY, of the people who are bitching would be happy, would be if they just shot Zimmerman, without bothering to try him. No one wanted justice, they wanted blood, and they're no better then the people they bitch about, and neither are you. Justice was served, but not the justice you want, so it isn't justice.

 

[Johan]

He fucking acted, AFTER Martin beat him in the fucking head!!!

Im not tallking about the shooting. I'm talking about a man who decided to take on him some kind of "neighborhood watch duty", saw a black teenager walking in the street, wearing a hoodie and went to him as if this teenager was endangering the neighborhood.
He's young, he's black, he's wearing a hoodie, he sure must be looking for trouble

 

[Philbert]

Well...duh. Yeah.
You said that was breaking the Constitution, which, even for you, is very dumb.

 

[Mr. Daystar]

Im not tallking about the shooting. I'm talking about a man who decided to take on him some kind of "neighborhood watch duty", saw a black teenager walking in the street, wearing a hoodie and went to him as if this teenager was endangering the neighborhood.
He's young, he's black, he's wearing a hoodie, he sure must be looking for trouble

So if you see a guy with a swastika tattoo, you'll give him the benefit of being a great humanitarian, or if you know someone has a ccw license, you won't automatically assume they're a gun nut? Your argument is utter bullshit, ya know why...BECAUSE PROFILING ACTUALLY WORKS!!!! That's right, sucks for a lot of people, but it's true....sometimes, the stereotypes are true. As we've seen from his violent nature, turns out, it was this time too. Martin could have called the police, and complained he was being followed, he could have called in that he was being harassed...but he chose to puff out his chest....and used it to catch a bullet.

 

[288gto]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/15/temar-boggs-jocelyn-rojas_n_3597825.html

2 days after Zimmerman was found guilty. Coincidences, sometimes, can be awesome.
If you believe in God, you may interpret this as a sign of Him, showing you what's a real neighborhood hero

everything happens every day, but depend what the medias serves to you man.

 

[Deepcover]

Johan is right

 

[Johan]

So if you see a guy with a swastika tattoo, you'll give him the benefit of being a great humanitarian, or if you know someone has a ccw license, you won't automatically assume they're a gun nut?

Invalid argument :
-A guy with a svastika tatoo has choosen to hold on his bareskin the symbol of an evil ideology he actually supports. Then if a guy has that kind of tattoo, it means he's a nazi. I mean, it's the very symbol of that ideology. Last time I checked black skin and hoodies weren't the very symbols of crime.
-A guy with a ccw is not always a gun nut.

 

[Philbert]

Invalid argument :
-A guy with a svastika tatoo has choosen to hold on his bareskin the symbol of an evil ideology he actually supports. Then if a guy has that kind of tattoo, it means he's a nazi. I mean, it's the very symbol of that ideology. Last time I checked black skin and hoodies weren't the very symbols of crime.
-A guy with a ccw is not always a gun nut.

Not only do you seem to assume the most incorrect possible choice, you like to pick the dumbest possible reason for anything.

There are people who have mended their ways, had a change of heart, grew up...whatever...and haven't had enough money to remove all their tattoos. You, of course, feel that profiling someone for something you are ignorant of is just delightful, but profiling the most common criminal (black man in a hoodie, pulled up) is heinous and UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

Swastika from Concise Encyclopedia:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/swastika


Equilateral cross with its arms bent at right angles, all in the same rotary direction, usually clockwise. It is used widely throughout the world as a symbol of prosperity and good fortune. In India, it continues to be the most common auspicious symbol of Hindus and Jains, as well as for Buddhists, for whom it symbolizes the Buddha’s feet or footprints. In China and Japan, where it traveled with the spread of Buddhism, it has been used to denote plurality, prosperity, and long life. It occurs as a motif in early Christian and Byzantine art, as well as in Maya and Navajo art. The counterclockwise swastika, suggested as a general anti-Semitic symbol in 1910 by the German poet and nationalist Guido von List, was adopted as the symbol of the Nazi Party at its founding in 1919–20.

 

[Johan]

Swatsticka
Equilateral cross with its arms bent at right angles, all in the same rotary direction, usually clockwise. It is used widely throughout the world as a symbol of prosperity and good fortune. In India, it continues to be the most common auspicious symbol of Hindus and Jains, as well as for Buddhists, for whom it symbolizes the Buddha’s feet or footprints. In China and Japan, where it traveled with the spread of Buddhism, it has been used to denote plurality, prosperity, and long life. It occurs as a motif in early Christian and Byzantine art, as well as in Maya and Navajo art. The counterclockwise swastika, suggested as a general anti-Semitic symbol in 1910 by the German poet and nationalist Guido von List, was adopted as the symbol of the Nazi Party at its founding in 1919–20.

Ok, fine you proved you know how to use a dictionnary :clap:
But you can't deny that the Svastika is, to every "western" people the very symbol of the IIIrd Reich.

 

[Philbert]

[

Ok, fine you proved you know how to use a dictionnary :clap:
But you can't deny that the Svastika is, to every "western" people the very symbol of the IIIrd Reich.

Of course...I have known for years and years that the Navajo and Buddhists had a symbol that resemble the Nazi swastika, and I usually recognize it. I have seen Hindi calendars and posters with the symbol often, how have You Missed such a common thing?
So, at last some honesty from you...you never check a dictionary or any sources for clear knowledge before making false statements. It makes sense, given the twisted shit you say in long streams of BS.


ATTACH]299561[/ATTACH]

 

[Mr. Daystar]

Not only that...the symbol of the swastika, AND the Maltese cross, existed LONG before the Nazi's, and their evil....sort of like Charley Chaplin had that same Hitler mustache, before Hitler had it...but because Hitler grew one, he ruined it for everyone else.


You are just as judgmental as the people you bitch about.

 

[Johan]

Equilateral cross with its arms bent at right angles, all in the same rotary direction, usually clockwise. It is used widely throughout the world as a symbol of prosperity and good fortune.
[...]
The counterclockwise swastika, suggested as a general anti-Semitic symbol in 1910 by the German poet and nationalist Guido von List, was adopted as the symbol of the Nazi Party at its founding in 1919–20

Now tell me : When revidffum asked me what would be my feeling if I would see a guy with a svasticka tattoo, what kind of svastika did he meant ? the symbol of prosperity and good fortune or the symbol the nazi party choosed when it was founded ?

 

[Philbert]

Listen dumbass, it doesn't matter...you make incorrect assumptions based on low levels of knowledge, and then make statements using your bigotry.
No one has much of a problem with a reasoned theory, you just grab whatever's handy and throw it out there.
My point is that you make bigoted assumptions, then rail on about someone being such a racist for making bigoted assumptions.
Blindness in the face of your own foolishness.
Cool...keep on being an easy target for stupid statements...you seem to like being wrong.