Mystery donor gave huge amount of money to make sure Gorsuch would be on the Supreme Court

Report: Single donor gave $28.5 million to 'dark money' group touting Gorsuch for Supreme Court


DENVER – A single person gave $28.5 million to a nonprofit whose "dark money" was eventually used to buy ads touting Colorado’s Neil Gorsuch for the U.S. Supreme Court seat he was eventually confirmed to, according to a new report from MapLight.

According to tax documents obtained from the Wellspring Committee, a Virginia nonprofit, the committee received more than $32 million in donations—much of the money anonymously donated because of the organization’s social welfare 501(c)(4) status.
The report says Wellspring had never received more than $13.2 million in a year before 2016, and that most of the $32 million came from one anonymous donor who shelled out $28.5 million.
Wellspring in turn donated $23 million to the Judicial Crisis Network, according to MapLight.

The Judicial Crisis Network—which was originally created as the “Judicial Confirmation network” to help confirm judiciary appointees of President George W. Bush’s, according to the Center for Responsive Politics—then spent at least $7 million in advertising against President Barack Obama’s appointment to the Supreme Court, Merrick Garland, according to MapLight and several other reports.
And shortly after President Donald Trump named Gorsuch as his pick for the Supreme Court in January, the Judicial Crisis Network launched a website called ConfirmGorsuch.com touting Gorsuch’s credentials, and said it would spend $10 million on advertising and lobbyists to get Gorsuch confirmed, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

Reporting from MapLight and the Center for Responsive Politics shows that the Wellspring Committee and Judicial Crisis Network are linked by Ann and Neil Corkery, who have both had top positions within one of the organizations, or both, in the past.


This is how you buy a set on th Supreme Court. And it seems to be much cheaper (and probably much more effective) than buying a congressman or even a President.
And we don't even know who bought that seat. Is it a pro-life group ? the CEO of a big corporation ? Is it a person or an organisation ?

Is that really how you guys want Supreme Court confirmations to be decided ?
Now, I know conservatives will probably think this is fine since it blocked Merrick Garland from being confirmed and allowed Neil Gorsuch to be but ho would you react if things were reversed, if an anonymous liberal donor had given million to make sure a very liberal judge would get a seat ? Wouldn't you be outraged ?
 
This is how you buy a set on th Supreme Court. And it seems to be much cheaper (and probably much more effective) than buying a congressman or even a President.
And we don't even know who bought that seat. Is it a pro-life group ? the CEO of a big corporation ? Is it a person or an organisation ?

Is that really how you guys want Supreme Court confirmations to be decided ?
Now, I know conservatives will probably think this is fine since it blocked Merrick Garland from being confirmed and allowed Neil Gorsuch to be but ho would you react if things were reversed, if an anonymous liberal donor had given million to make sure a very liberal judge would get a seat ? Wouldn't you be outraged ?

Dumbest post of the year. Garland was not allowed to move forward and within the senate’s constitutional power of advise and consent. It didn’t cost a damn cent to stop him.
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
I'm not necessarily against "dark money", fools are often parted with it.
 
Top