I think this is a touch misleading. The woman went in there under false pretenses, lied about her situation, as well as lying (I'm assuming) about her belief in God. If a person is predisposed to religion, or a belief in a Christian God, and walks into a Christian-affiliated clinic, of their own volition, under the guise of having their "gay problem" sorted wouldn't you think that the therapy might involve some sort of religious aspect? If people are predisposed to a religious background, or foundation, it seems reasonable to assume that if they themselves are actively seeking help or "treatment," as it were, for being gay that the concept of the Bible and its teachings might be used as a basis for "therapy?" I mean, the facility does acknowledge the fact that it has Christian affiliations. Lying to the people, telling them you're "confused" and that you do believe in God, what else would you expect from such a facility?
I'd be more interested in what the "therapy" would have looked like if the woman had claimed no belief in God, and made it to seem that she was forced into coming into the clinic. I could be wrong, but maybe the "therapy" would look completely different.
I'm not a Bachmann fan by any stretch, but this is such a non-story. The headline should have read "Christian-affiliated Clinic Utilizes Faith and the Bible in Therapy Sessions. Surprised?"
When it comes down to it, this is nothing more than a publicity stunt that this woman is pulling in an effort to generate controversy and interest in her upcoming movie, which I'm sure will be a real gem.
