Be it videos or pictures, I for one, am in no doubt that low budget/amateur is the ONLY way to go!!
Videos - Fuck VIVID with their crap presentations!!(and any other big budget XXX companies) They get the hottest chicks and then proceed to film them in wannabe proper movie style - great lighting, wasteful sets, wasteful dialogue, lack of nasty, prolonged, close-up shots of brown-eyes and pussies gaping, topped off with frustrating-as-hell camera positions that do little for my tastes.
I'll take this one over the above ALWAYS!! - rented motel room, handi-cam film quality and lighting, "eat my ass!!" and similar dirty dialogue, long and well positioned close-ups that expose the girls' realness and imperfections, topped off with camera angles shot by a fellow pervert of dirty nature.
How many times must I suffer in silence as I watch Raylene get her PERFECT ass up in the air doggy-style, only to have a scenic, far-away shot be the closest I get to her wet nasties??!! IT ***** ME!!! I need to get closer and see the tone of her skin, to see that lovely asshole looking down on the dude's cock ramming her puss!! Fuck the artistic merit - I need them girls to look imperfect and REAL!!
Same goes for pictures. No airbrushed, enhanced studio shot comes close to the power of a simple, imperfect, amateur photo.
My favorite example - Aria Giovanni : I get nothing from her newest and most abundant series of photos. Perfect make-up, perfect skin, Playboy lighting...I **** them!!(not really)
I scour the net for the long lost pics I used to have of her. Her early shots in pre-fame spreads - the orange bikini set that I can't find is my all time fave! In these types of layouts, the girls look real and are a stone's throw from the cute girls you pass by on the street.
Brittney Skye photographed in some naturally lit hallway, posing like a good whore can?
or
Brittney Skye photographed in some clean, white, mega-lit studio that turns her skin into one perfect tone and makes her lovely boobs look all the more fake and un-inspiring?
Whenever I hit a link one of two things occur...
Upon seeing the set is pro, I scroll down quickly and close the link soonafter(prime example - VIRTUA GIRL sets)
Upon seeing the set is low-budget, I yell in delight and check every shot(usually of greater size - I **** THE 1/4 SCREEN PRO SIZE) taking in the realness of the scene and enjoying the simplicity of it all.
Real over perfect...always for me.
If any of you brothers can find Aria's orange bikini set for me(I'm searched out), your rep points will forever be infused with weekly contributions from me(and others as well, most likely)
Videos - Fuck VIVID with their crap presentations!!(and any other big budget XXX companies) They get the hottest chicks and then proceed to film them in wannabe proper movie style - great lighting, wasteful sets, wasteful dialogue, lack of nasty, prolonged, close-up shots of brown-eyes and pussies gaping, topped off with frustrating-as-hell camera positions that do little for my tastes.
I'll take this one over the above ALWAYS!! - rented motel room, handi-cam film quality and lighting, "eat my ass!!" and similar dirty dialogue, long and well positioned close-ups that expose the girls' realness and imperfections, topped off with camera angles shot by a fellow pervert of dirty nature.
How many times must I suffer in silence as I watch Raylene get her PERFECT ass up in the air doggy-style, only to have a scenic, far-away shot be the closest I get to her wet nasties??!! IT ***** ME!!! I need to get closer and see the tone of her skin, to see that lovely asshole looking down on the dude's cock ramming her puss!! Fuck the artistic merit - I need them girls to look imperfect and REAL!!
Same goes for pictures. No airbrushed, enhanced studio shot comes close to the power of a simple, imperfect, amateur photo.
My favorite example - Aria Giovanni : I get nothing from her newest and most abundant series of photos. Perfect make-up, perfect skin, Playboy lighting...I **** them!!(not really)
I scour the net for the long lost pics I used to have of her. Her early shots in pre-fame spreads - the orange bikini set that I can't find is my all time fave! In these types of layouts, the girls look real and are a stone's throw from the cute girls you pass by on the street.
Brittney Skye photographed in some naturally lit hallway, posing like a good whore can?
or
Brittney Skye photographed in some clean, white, mega-lit studio that turns her skin into one perfect tone and makes her lovely boobs look all the more fake and un-inspiring?
Whenever I hit a link one of two things occur...
Upon seeing the set is pro, I scroll down quickly and close the link soonafter(prime example - VIRTUA GIRL sets)
Upon seeing the set is low-budget, I yell in delight and check every shot(usually of greater size - I **** THE 1/4 SCREEN PRO SIZE) taking in the realness of the scene and enjoying the simplicity of it all.
Real over perfect...always for me.
If any of you brothers can find Aria's orange bikini set for me(I'm searched out), your rep points will forever be infused with weekly contributions from me(and others as well, most likely)
