Liberals only like the founding fathers when they are minorities

For months the liberal media has been slobbering over the play "Hamilton". Even Obama met the actors.

Why are they so excited about this play?

Because it portrays all the founding fathers as blacks and hispanics. Liberals usually disparage the founding fathers as evil slaveholders.

But when the founding fathers are portrayed as minorities, liberals sing a different tune! They love it!

Rewriting history and turning white historical figures into black and hispanic ones appeals to liberals because so many are self-hating white people.

But if the tables were turned, if they tried to make a play of "Roots" with white actors portraying the virtuous slaves, everyone would be called racist. But when white people are erased from history, that's called art.

Here's what the creator of the play had to say about his casting choices:

We're telling the story of old, dead white men but we're using actors of color, and that makes the story more immediate and more accessible to a contemporary audience.

Why can a story only be "accessible" if all the actors are minorities? That itself is racist.

http://newsmachete.com/?news=1674
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
It's apparent that you have a problem with logic, perhaps a Venn Diagram would be more your speed, and you can do this for pretty much ALL the topics you post about "Liberal" this or "Feminists" that. You're welcome.

venn.jpg
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
How am I going to know whether not I like a topic UNLESS I read it? You put this shit out on a public forum open to public criticism, if you don't want to be criticized for your lack of critical thinking abilities you should stop creating topics that display your ignorance.
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
And just to clarify, it's not about whether or not I "LIKE" a topic, it's about you deliberately misrepresenting ALL liberals as one thing or all feminists as another. The same can be said of any left-winger that claims "Conservatives are all racists" or any other idiotic hasty generalization. Perhaps you should consider why it is the best you've got is trash talk about the other side.
 
so why aren't feminist protesting against the epidemic of female rapists raping underage boys and getting lighter sentences than men who do the same with underage girls? why aren't they protesting against women getting lighter sentences than men for similar crimes? some are are calling to abolish female prisons. why groups like NOW national organization for women always protesting against share custody bill and proposals? like the recent case in Florida?why aren't they protesting against female columnists in news papers like the Guardian, Washington Post, etc inciting anti-male hatred? The Guardian refuse to fire Julie Bindel who last august call for placing men in concentration caps. they also refuse to fire Barbara Ellen who openly support female rapists who rape underage boys. etc i can go on and on and on. and when you bring these up feminists either cry satire(especially with male genocide advocates), constantly do damage control, say not all feminist are like that and ding nothing to get rid of them, etc
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
Why are you bitching and moaning about what other people may or may not be doing? I'm so sick of that narrative, "President Obama ISN'T" fill in the fucking blank, among many others. You don't know that "feminists" aren't whatever because you can't be all places at all times knowing what everyone is or ISN'T doing. Seek it out, I'm sure you'll find it. In the meantime, why don't you try contributing something positive instead of being continually negative. Nice dodge of the points I posted above, don't try to steer the topic away from your glaring lack of critical thinking abilities, your exceptional ignorance, grossly misrepresenting groups you oppose, and non-stop trash talk. I suppose you think that by trash-talking groups you don't like that you somehow default to the righteous and good side of things, sorry, doesn't work that way.
 
Feminists calling for male genocide since 1892

YqEhVUh.png




2016

http://archive.is/jY5w1

FROM THE Feminist Current

What can be done? Well, I’ve decided the Earth needs a Mandemic. The human herd must be culled, and it’s time for buck season.
I know what you’re thinking… Cool! How could this work?
I happened to be watching an episode of Star Trek: Voyager last night when the idea came to me. There could be a virus that causes gene mutations in men that rewrites their DNA. Then, when men have sex with women, they are drained of their DNA, “where it is then implanted into females, causing the death of the males. As a result, new males are constantly created and harvested” by women, as suits their needs. You should have seen the desiccated corpses on the Taresian planet!
 

Supafly

Retired Mod
Bronze Member
if you don't like the topics don't read them. and speaking of feminists. feminism started as the women's wing of the KKK

Please let me say this:

You probably made the post of the year 2016
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
Feminists calling for male genocide since 1892

You seriously need to work on finding your own voice and identity, it's not healthy to identify yourself as part of a group and let said group do all of your thinking for you and then extrapolate your problem on to others.
 

GodsEmbryo

Closed Account
[...] We're telling the story of old, dead white men but we're using actors of color, and that makes the story more immediate and more accessible to a contemporary audience.
[...]

Nothing to do with liberals but with stupidity. If you want to tell a historical story, respect the history and show it as it was instead of falsifying it. Let people learn from the past instead of creating a fairy tale.
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
getting news reports about feminists and showing what feminist say on their websites is not letting others think for oyu

You're really not a smart person, refer to the fucking Venn Diagram in post #2. I'm sure you will still be struggling after referring to the fucking Venn Diagram in post #2, so, to make things even simpler for you; A person or group of people acting of their own accord do not define a larger group to which they may belong. Is that simple enough for you? In other words, stop trying to slander whole groups of people based on the independent actions of a small subset of said group. And, again, don't try to steer the topic away from your glaring lack of critical thinking abilities, your exceptional ignorance, grossly misrepresenting groups you oppose, and non-stop trash talk. Trash-talking groups you don't like does not by default put you on the righteous and good side of things.
 

Jagger69

Three lullabies in an ancient tongue
I normally ignore your consistently prejudicial views on just about everything but, in this instance, I feel compelled to speak out and agree with xfire. You seem to have some real issues regarding certain groups.....feminists seemingly being the common denominator. Indeed, simply because you find cause to disagree with anyone or any group doesn't, by contrast, immediately make you righteous. You should try to be more tolerant and look at others as individuals instead of lumping people together as a single entity. I believe your approach is the very definition of bigotry in all candor. I find it quite humorous that you consider an obviously slanted website like newsmachete.com to qualify as a legitimate "news source". Sorry amigo, it's not. I'm betting that you're probably doing all kinds of research even as we speak on this "Venn" dude that xfire mentions just so you can rip into him as well.
 

Jagger69

Three lullabies in an ancient tongue
Jaggar69 constantly crying bigot when you failed to show me post where i say bigoted statements is not an argument and does not prove you right.

LOL try starting with the title of this thread, Einstein. I mean, you DO understand the meaning of the word "bigot", don't you? :dunno:
 
Top