IRS Sent Same Letter to Democrats That Fed Tea Party Row

The Internal Revenue Service, under pressure after admitting it targeted anti-tax Tea Party groups for scrutiny in recent years, also had its eye on at least three Democratic-leaning organizations seeking nonprofit status.

One of those groups, Emerge America, saw its tax-exempt status denied, forcing it to disclose its donors and pay some taxes. None of the Republican groups have said their applications were rejected.

Progress Texas, another of the organizations, faced the same lines of questioning as the Tea Party groups from the same IRS office that issued letters to the Republican-friendly applicants. A third group, Clean Elections Texas, which supports public funding of campaigns, also received IRS inquiries.

In a statement late yesterday, the tax agency said it had pooled together the politically active nonpartisan applicants -- including a “minority” that were identified because of their names. “It is also important to understand that the group of centralized cases included organizations of all political views,” the IRS said in its statement.

President Barack Obama, in a statement last night, called the IRS employees’ actions “intolerable” and directed Treasury Secretary Jacob J. Lew to hold “those responsible for these failures accountable.”

Tax agency officials told lawmakers in a briefing yesterday that 471 groups received additional scrutiny, a total that indicates a crackdown on politically active nonprofit groups that extends beyond the Tea Party outfits.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-...tter-to-democrats-that-fed-tea-party-row.html

Doesn't make it right, but it shows that this wasn't solely focused on right wing organizations.
 
Non-profit political groups should face extra scrutiny, it just needs to be applied evenly.
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
Perhaps this was the sort of fraud the IRS was attempting to prevent in their scrutiny of Tea Bag organizations.

http://www.prwatch.org/news/2013/01...through-shell-corporation-may-have-violated-f
$12M Donation to FreedomWorks Laundered through a "Shell Corporation" May Have Violated Federal Law

New details are emerging about how a multi-millionaire used shell corporations to funnel money to the Super PAC associated with embattled Tea Party group FreedomWorks for America -- and how those laundered contributions may have violated federal law.

FreedomWorks, which until recently was led by former House majority leader Dick Armey and GOP activist Matt Kibbe, has been in the midst of turmoil, with Armey abruptly resigning weeks after the November 2012 elections. Soon after his resignation became public, it was revealed that a majority of funding for the FreedomWorks Super PAC came from from Specialty Investments Group Inc. and Kingston Pike Development Corp., two corporations incorporated on September 26 and 27, respectively, and which gave over $12 million to FreedomWorks in the six weeks between their incorporation and election day.

Knoxville, Tenn.-based attorney William S. Rose incorporated both groups and is listed as Specialty Investments Group's CEO (and put his $634,000 home as its principal address). Both corporations have done little else besides give money to FreedomWorks, but Rose has denied that the entities are shell corporations, calling the business of the new companies a "family secret."

Two election watchdog groups are not buying Rose's claims. The Campaign Legal Center and Democracy 21 filed complaints with the Federal Election Commission before Christmas alleging the donations from these companies to the Super PAC violate federal law prohibiting political contributions from being made in the name of another person.

The contributions "raise serious questions about whether this was an illegal scheme to launder money into the 2012 elections and hide from the public the true identity of the sources of the money," said Fred Wertheimer, president of Democracy 21.
Washington Post Reveals Identity of Secret Donor

When asked about the laundered contributions in early December, Armey pleaded ignorance. "I know nothing about this," he told Mother Jones. "This kind of secrecy is why I left." Kibbe also said he knew nothing about the donations.

But in late December, after the complaints were filed, the Washington Post revealed that Illinois millionaire Richard J. Stephenson reportedly provided the $12 million that was laundered through Rose's companies, along with a request that at least some of the money support far-right Tea Party Congressman Joe Walsh in Illinois (who lost).

Stephenson, a former investment banker and founder of the for-profit Cancer Treatment Centers of America, has a seat on the FreedomWorks board. He was an early supporter of David Koch's Citizens for a Sound Economy, the right-wing advocacy group founded by David Koch that in 2004 split into FreedomWorks and Americans for Prosperity.

But Stephenson's involvement did not end there.

The Post described how Armey had staged a short-lived coup in the final weeks of the election, entering the FreedomWorks offices with an armed aide and firing five top employees. Stephenson intervened, offering Armey an $8 million payout in exchange for resigning from his post and remaining silent until after the election about his concerns regarding Kibbe's ethics. FreedomWorks was actively involved in the 2012 elections, both through its Super PAC and other aspects of its operations.

Armey told ABC News that Stephenson stepped in because he "was concerned I was going to resign [from FreedomWorks] and sue them before the [presidential] election. He didn't want an uproar. We all understood if I take any action that made it at all public it would be a press nightmare and we didn't want that before the election..."

"So [Stephenson] was saying, 'You know, Armey, my family and I have heard your story, about how you can't afford to retire and we want to help with your retirement,'" Armey said.

Armey will receive $400,000 a year for the next twenty years, ostensibly to serve as a "consultant" for Stephenson.
Shell Corporations Evade Transparency Requirements

Super PACs -- made possible by the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. FEC and the related DC Circuit decision Speechnow v. FEC -- can accept unlimited, multi-million dollar contributions and spend unlimited amounts on ads run independently of candidates, but must report the names of their donors and the amount of their contributions. Despite wide public opposition to the Supreme Court striking down Congress' power to regulate election-related spending, the majority of justices in Citizens United placed great weight on the notion that the identity of donors should not be kept secret. "Transparency enables the electorate to make informed decisions and give proper weight to different speakers and messages," Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for the majority in Citizens United.

Dark money nonprofits that do not disclose their donors played an unprecedented role in the 2012 elections but were not the only secret money game in town. Millions of dollars were also laundered to Super PACs through fake shell corporations apparently set up for no reason other than to allow wealthy donors (perhaps even foreign donors) to influence elections from the shadows. (CMD opposes such secrecy for such election spending, as it outlined in its testimony to Congress).

The individuals behind the shell corporations that donated to FreedomWorks may also have violated other federal election laws by failing to organize and register each corporation as a political committee and file financial statements, the Democracy 21/Campaign Legal Center complaints allege.

"If donors can launder huge, secret contributions through corporate shells into federal elections, campaign finance disclosure laws enacted to prevent corruption are fundamentally undermined," Wertheimer said.

The groups also filed a complaint with the Department of Justice repeating the allegations. Although the FEC enforces campaign finance laws, the Justice Department can conduct criminal investigations of "knowing and willful" violations under the 1971 Federal Election Campaign Act.
Other Shell Corporations

The FreedomWorks Super PAC was not the only one to receive contributions from shell corporations. Restore Our Future, the Super PAC associated with Mitt Romney's unsuccessful presidential campaign, received $1 million each from F8 LLC and Eli Publishing, two corporations that appear to do little else besides provide donors a way to anonymously funnel money to political organizations. Former Bain Capital executive Edward Conard tried using the same scheme in 2011, hiding his $1 million contribution by forming a sham corporation called W. Spann LLC, but revealed his identity after critics filed a complaint with the FEC.

Neither the FEC nor the IRS, however, regularly review whether a corporation or corporate donor is a "shell." It is only because of intrepid investigators and journalists that corporations like Specialty Investments Group Inc. and W. Spann LLC have been uncovered as a sham, and the true source of their funds exposed.
 
Perhaps this was the sort of fraud the IRS was attempting to prevent in their scrutiny of Tea Bag organizations.

http://www.prwatch.org/news/2013/01...through-shell-corporation-may-have-violated-f

You're gonna need an extra pot of coffee. If we want to go down this route to try and justify it, we can also look into the ways that dems funneled
money, I am sure things will be found. I would love for this to uncover things on both sides and even better the prepaid credit cards originating from China that were used to donate large sums of money to the DNC and Obama campaigns. I haven't really got all worked up about this but the more dems try and turn the tables makes me think that there is more to it than it first appeared. Let's light this candle.
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
You're gonna need an extra pot of coffee. If we want to go down this route to try and justify it, we can also look into the ways that dems funneled
money, I am sure things will be found. I would love for this to uncover things on both sides and even better the prepaid credit cards originating from China that were used to donate large sums of money to the DNC and Obama campaigns. I haven't really got all worked up about this but the more dems try and turn the tables makes me think that there is more to it than it first appeared. Let's light this candle.

The candle's been lit and it's going to burn a hole in the people pushing it as a "scandal".
 
The candle's been lit and it's going to burn a hole in the people pushing it as a "scandal".

We're a year and a half away from the next election. This is the perfect time to delve into this. If nothing is there there is plenty of time to back off. if there is, there is 18 months to recapture the senate.

The dems will be extremely fortunate if something significant doesn't bite them in the ass out of 3 going on at one time. I can tell you this, if there is something the AP will lead the media charge.
 
Although I differ on many view points from Blue, I respect him (as much as I can respect a lawyer lol) and to put him in the same class as Sam is ludicrous
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
Well that didn't last long. I thought we were starting to get along.. or at least tolerate each other lol

You've never won Asshat of the Year. Let me rephrase, counselor- "Oh, look Sam Fisher is emulating Will E Worm.". I apologize for being ambiguous.

To address your last post-

We're a year and a half away from the next election. This is the perfect time to delve into this. If nothing is there there is plenty of time to back off. if there is, there is 18 months to recapture the senate.

The dems will be extremely fortunate if something significant doesn't bite them in the ass out of 3 going on at one time. I can tell you this, if there is something the AP will lead the media charge.

These three scandals running concurrently isn't a coincidence. This is an orchestrated effort by the GOP that's going to end up blowing up in their faces and hurting them more in the long run.
 
Top