In a fight who would win? Tiger Vs Lion

[habo9]

Ive often wondered in a straight 1 on 1 fight who do you think would win?


Me personally I think a Tiger could whip a solo male lions ass easily

 

[Will E Worm]

It depends they will all act differently.

This fight didn't go well for the lion.

 

[mrtrebus]

Lion

 

[Neutron66]

A tiger would destroy a lion.

Lions aren't that tough. They always fight in groups.

Tigers are more solitary.

 

[Baill Inneraora]

A liger is pretty much my favorite animal.

 

[Artimus]

Tiger - physically bigger and much better at fending for itself.

Lion (male) - smaller, slower and lazier.

 

[rob41493]

i would say a lion

 

[Will E Worm]

Click the picture on my first comment. :tongue:

 

[habo9]

It depends they will all act differently.

This fight didn't go well for the lion.

That lion was about to get its ass whipped :1orglaugh

 

[Perilypos]

I believe that a tiger would prevail over a lion. There are at least 2 reasons that lead me into the conclusion:

1) Tigers are, except South-East Asian subspecies (i. e. Indochinese tiger, South China tiger, Malayan tiger and insular subspecies Sumatran tiger, Balinese tiger - extinct, Javan tiger - also extinct) larger than lions (an important fact is that the subspecies of lion are less variable in size than those of tiger).

2) In the areas shared by both species (Persia, India) the tiger has been superior to the lion and expansive at the expense thereof (however, this fact can hardly be confirmed nowadays, since in Persia both species are practically extinct and Indian lions face extinction too - there are only about 150 individuals remaining in Gir Forest National Park in India).

 

[habo9]

I believe that a tiger would prevail over a lion. There are at least 2 reasons that lead me into the conclusion:

1) Tigers are, except South-East Asian subspecies (i. e. Indochinese tiger, South China tiger, Malayan tiger and insular subspecies Sumatran tiger, Balinese tiger - extinct, Javan tiger - also extinct) larger than lions (an important fact is that the subspecies of lion are less variable in size than those of tiger).

2) In the areas shared by both species (Persia, India) the tiger has been superior to the lion and expansive at the expense thereof (however, this fact can hardly be confirmed nowadays, since in Persia both species are practically extinct and Indian lions face extinction too - there are only about 150 individuals remaining in Gir Forest National Park in India).

Barbary lions are tough fuckers as well though

 

[minidog]

I'll go against the vote.....
Lion, King of the Beasts

 

[mrtrebus]

I believe that a tiger would prevail over a lion. There are at least 2 reasons that lead me into the conclusion:

1) Tigers are, except South-East Asian subspecies (i. e. Indochinese tiger, South China tiger, Malayan tiger and insular subspecies Sumatran tiger, Balinese tiger - extinct, Javan tiger - also extinct) larger than lions (an important fact is that the subspecies of lion are less variable in size than those of tiger).

Goliath was larger than David. :dunno:

 

[habo9]

Goliath was larger than David. :dunno:

Thats not real , its a story in some book cant mind its name........lol

 

[Will E Worm]

Thats not real , its a story in some book cant mind its name........lol

What? :nono:

 

[Baill Inneraora]

Goliath was larger than David. :dunno:

Can lions use a sling shot?

 

[habo9]

What? :nono:

I know what book its from lol I was taking the piss :tongue:

 

[Gameboy]

a Bear. oh my...

 

[Kingfisher]

Tiger.

 

[shillfinder]

But more importantly, who would win: a Glass Tiger or a White Lion?