Important announcement regarding the future of this forum - PLEASE READ

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Aces&amp;Jacks" data-source="post: 2265723" data-attributes="member: 2975">If their was an automated, software driven system to do that, which there isn't, it would be a great idea. But since there isn't an automated system, no Mod has either the time, desire or inclination to somehow mark hundreds of threads on a daily basis. We would have to spend all of our time in the ID section and how would we know when a babe was identified? How would we know if the ID was correct? Do we have to then search the internet sites to insure that the ID is correct? Fact checking is another profession.So that then leaves marking the threads to the individuals who requested the ID, since no other member can do any editing at all on a thread they did not create. Here you don't have the problem of having to somehow mark hundreds of threads on a daily basis, but only the thread you requested the ID in. Let's assume this mark can be put in the Title of the thread. The problems here is you only have ten minutes to edit a thread, and that's not going to change for the simple reason that it is more important to keep a short editing time limit for other reasons more important than marking id threads. It sometimes takes days to get an id. Then you still have the problem of whether the id is correct. Do you want to leave it in the hands of a person who didn't even know who it was in the first place to mark a thread as identified?And finally, there is the mark itself. What and how? Your guess is as good as mine on this one. The only conceivable thing I can think of is placing something in the title of the thread, like "Identified". But again, editing for members is only 10 minutes. So that's not a good option.</blockquote>

Name

Verification: A human has how many arms?