There are so many beautiful women in the world, thin and thick. I know a lot of men go for the bust first, and then evaluate the rest. I've always been the opposite. I go for the body, and look to the breasts to complete them. I'm not against "sticks with tits," but I really need a solid body, which usually means curvy, and that usually means more thicker than thinner.
Jana Defi (Boobpedia) is my ideal of a supermodel looker (nose included, God help me I lust for such a profile), on a wider, curvy, juicy body, while she is still a hard body overall. She is my ideal of a "Perfect 10" in form and beauty. I know a little wider form, even if still very slender like Jana, causes some men to ignore her. I notice similarly with Sensual Jane (Boobpedia), her slightly wider form causes some men to glance over her as not thin enough. But such bodies are unreal, womanly and absolutely as far from "fat" as you can get.
But I'm still a man who lusts for womanly curves. I do often lust for women in their 20s, usually not much under 25, but often preferring them as they mature, thicken and even loosen into their 30s. Going from 50kg to 70g, expanding, but still keeping their perfect hourglass, just in added proportion. A woman who takes care of the kids during the day, and spreads at night so I can nibble on her extremities before just taking her and unleashing my lust. I guess I'm one not looking for a woman who calls herself a "whore," but at most, maybe a woman who is a sophisticated "tart" that wants to be filled with cream.
Now I did begin a deep lover of British Michelle Bond (Boobpedia) and her thinner curves and her unreal hourglass, which was (and is even more now) well covered by her breasts from the front, when she was in her early to mid 20s. I've written extensively about my lust for Michelle, including my "Seven Year Itch," with her a couple years ago, which is now heading into a decade. Usually if a woman does not captivate me beyond seven years, she is a lust, but not a deep lust. But Michelle, she keeps killing me year after year, and that is an eternal lust. And maybe it was growing up with British magazines in the late '80s and early '90s that catered to fuller forms than the American media that has not just gone thinner and bonier, but straighter and straighter to the point of destroying any lust of mine, but I've always found Michelle typical of a sophisticated, British lass.
Although I have many favorite sets of Michelle, I am a man of many desires. In my fantasies, I always imagine "discovering" Michelle at an early age, and somehow convincing her to join me in an open relationship. Such a beauty as Michelle should not be limited to one man, and I just merely promise to take care of her through her life, a life I want to watch as she matures and blooms into total beauty. I recognized her in her thin form at those early ages as having a perfect hourglass that would become the ultimate, womanly form. And damn if I was not right back in 2003 or so. I am sure the early years would be dominated by men who wanted thin beauty and bust, but I would rather enjoy the sexual prime and middle age years where other men mutually preferred her thicker for with me.
Natural Joanna (Boobpedia) and her hourglass has always captivated me as well, even though she's always been a bit thicker, never as thin as Michelle, and so few women will ever match Michelle's extreme midsection and inflection (at least very few who are natural in the chest). She is another example of a great hourglass in her 20s, loosening and becoming even more striking with age. Some may disagree, and that is fine. Others might have issues with Joanna's look, maybe small details like her teeth, of which we Americans are all too (and quite infamously so) disconcerting about at times. God knows I'm so lucky today with my real life, busty Hungarian wife, likely because some men were focused on her teeth or some other, little detail. I guess that's why I'm a sucker for Slavic and other women, centuries upon centuries of racial mixture to perfect the female form, even far more so than the American south (which has only had a couple of centuries). All while in the former Soviet blocs, dental work was not a priority, which is somehow a factor for too many Americans.
So as much as I do think both are beautiful and striking neck-up, and I will not deny their breasts are now only thicker, wider and fuller, it's still the fact that into their 30s, both Michelle and Joanna have thickened and matured into absolute perfection. Yes, their stomachs are not perfectly flat any more (and some would argue never "hard enough" in the first place). Yes, their breasts have become even thicker, fuller, wider and hang more, which some will assume should be the focus. But it's their base forms, no longer in their 20s, that are my ultimate desire. There's just something erotic about lusting for a woman not just in her ripe, young age, but into her sexually primed, loosened, but even more "womanly" (dare I say "heavenly"?) form.
I will not deny I would love to have my choice of pairs between the two here, in the bath, and put my rod in between them as the water flows over. I would absolutely lust for such "mammary intercourse" with either, let alone a choice of both. But my true desire is still to bend them over, eat them until they could take no more, and then spear them, holding their bodies, becoming one with them, in their full, complete, total form.
But I am a man who is not selfish and would not want to be alone. I'd love to have a fellow, male luster of these two, "thickened to perfection," lovelies, so one would be taken care of while I was focused on another. After all, if Joanna is going to join us, I would love for Michelle to have her choice of rod in her bust, or deep inside her, as well. If you love such beauties, feel free to PM me about my desire to share in such lusts and experiences of my idea of the perfect form. If anything, you can help me choose who to unleash my lust over ... or deep inside of.
Public Samples of Picture Set DDF Busty 9178: http://www.candypleasure.com/ddfbusty/9178-lesbo/
My Related Lustings of Michelle in 2013: http://profvolup.tumblr.com/post/39608156315/a-lot-of-people-talk-about-thin-busty-women
Jana Defi (Boobpedia) is my ideal of a supermodel looker (nose included, God help me I lust for such a profile), on a wider, curvy, juicy body, while she is still a hard body overall. She is my ideal of a "Perfect 10" in form and beauty. I know a little wider form, even if still very slender like Jana, causes some men to ignore her. I notice similarly with Sensual Jane (Boobpedia), her slightly wider form causes some men to glance over her as not thin enough. But such bodies are unreal, womanly and absolutely as far from "fat" as you can get.
But I'm still a man who lusts for womanly curves. I do often lust for women in their 20s, usually not much under 25, but often preferring them as they mature, thicken and even loosen into their 30s. Going from 50kg to 70g, expanding, but still keeping their perfect hourglass, just in added proportion. A woman who takes care of the kids during the day, and spreads at night so I can nibble on her extremities before just taking her and unleashing my lust. I guess I'm one not looking for a woman who calls herself a "whore," but at most, maybe a woman who is a sophisticated "tart" that wants to be filled with cream.
Now I did begin a deep lover of British Michelle Bond (Boobpedia) and her thinner curves and her unreal hourglass, which was (and is even more now) well covered by her breasts from the front, when she was in her early to mid 20s. I've written extensively about my lust for Michelle, including my "Seven Year Itch," with her a couple years ago, which is now heading into a decade. Usually if a woman does not captivate me beyond seven years, she is a lust, but not a deep lust. But Michelle, she keeps killing me year after year, and that is an eternal lust. And maybe it was growing up with British magazines in the late '80s and early '90s that catered to fuller forms than the American media that has not just gone thinner and bonier, but straighter and straighter to the point of destroying any lust of mine, but I've always found Michelle typical of a sophisticated, British lass.
Although I have many favorite sets of Michelle, I am a man of many desires. In my fantasies, I always imagine "discovering" Michelle at an early age, and somehow convincing her to join me in an open relationship. Such a beauty as Michelle should not be limited to one man, and I just merely promise to take care of her through her life, a life I want to watch as she matures and blooms into total beauty. I recognized her in her thin form at those early ages as having a perfect hourglass that would become the ultimate, womanly form. And damn if I was not right back in 2003 or so. I am sure the early years would be dominated by men who wanted thin beauty and bust, but I would rather enjoy the sexual prime and middle age years where other men mutually preferred her thicker for with me.
Natural Joanna (Boobpedia) and her hourglass has always captivated me as well, even though she's always been a bit thicker, never as thin as Michelle, and so few women will ever match Michelle's extreme midsection and inflection (at least very few who are natural in the chest). She is another example of a great hourglass in her 20s, loosening and becoming even more striking with age. Some may disagree, and that is fine. Others might have issues with Joanna's look, maybe small details like her teeth, of which we Americans are all too (and quite infamously so) disconcerting about at times. God knows I'm so lucky today with my real life, busty Hungarian wife, likely because some men were focused on her teeth or some other, little detail. I guess that's why I'm a sucker for Slavic and other women, centuries upon centuries of racial mixture to perfect the female form, even far more so than the American south (which has only had a couple of centuries). All while in the former Soviet blocs, dental work was not a priority, which is somehow a factor for too many Americans.
So as much as I do think both are beautiful and striking neck-up, and I will not deny their breasts are now only thicker, wider and fuller, it's still the fact that into their 30s, both Michelle and Joanna have thickened and matured into absolute perfection. Yes, their stomachs are not perfectly flat any more (and some would argue never "hard enough" in the first place). Yes, their breasts have become even thicker, fuller, wider and hang more, which some will assume should be the focus. But it's their base forms, no longer in their 20s, that are my ultimate desire. There's just something erotic about lusting for a woman not just in her ripe, young age, but into her sexually primed, loosened, but even more "womanly" (dare I say "heavenly"?) form.
I will not deny I would love to have my choice of pairs between the two here, in the bath, and put my rod in between them as the water flows over. I would absolutely lust for such "mammary intercourse" with either, let alone a choice of both. But my true desire is still to bend them over, eat them until they could take no more, and then spear them, holding their bodies, becoming one with them, in their full, complete, total form.
But I am a man who is not selfish and would not want to be alone. I'd love to have a fellow, male luster of these two, "thickened to perfection," lovelies, so one would be taken care of while I was focused on another. After all, if Joanna is going to join us, I would love for Michelle to have her choice of rod in her bust, or deep inside her, as well. If you love such beauties, feel free to PM me about my desire to share in such lusts and experiences of my idea of the perfect form. If anything, you can help me choose who to unleash my lust over ... or deep inside of.
Public Samples of Picture Set DDF Busty 9178: http://www.candypleasure.com/ddfbusty/9178-lesbo/
My Related Lustings of Michelle in 2013: http://profvolup.tumblr.com/post/39608156315/a-lot-of-people-talk-about-thin-busty-women
We started out with the magnificent rack of Emma Glover.
