I've graduated from some schools in the past, but if I really cared about voting, I'd still vote for the one with the biggest boobs...
...just as nature goes; if you are an ugly woman, anything you say will always be meaningless, you will still be ugly and that will make you irrelevant. When you are pretty, anything you say will be meaningless, you are pretty and that will make anything you say meaningful, unless that's against my beliefs. Intelligence belongs to materialistic beliefs and is unnatural to many core needs that dominate each one of our choices, excluding psychopathic behaviour. One trying to get acknowledged by intelligence is a direct proof of ones own stupidity. Just like women trying to get acknowledged by the price tag in their shoes. Interestingly enough, majority of the people in earth when asked if they think they are smarter than average will almost always think that they are, regardless of their answer. You could say this is a definition of being what makes one nothing more than an average person...
I live in a country where education is usually said to be at decent levels, but we do not really have much of this concept of "better" and "worse" schools even thought some areas have certain effects to popularity. People usually know that schools tend to be more for giving a general information without really knowing much about anything, while people still learn what matters by doing... Does not make too much difference where you gain your ass-wipe graduation papers here...
Why are certain schools around the word so much "better" than other schools? Do they have better quality of education and content of studies, are their teachers actually super professionals compared to teachers in other schools, are their teaching techniques better than other schools or are they just flying by the fame of having higher minimum entry requirements to their school? What does make these people in school X so much better than people in school Y expecting that they have same kind of degree? How many famous successful business men there are that have "not" graduated from these "famous" schools you can name, compared to ones who have graduated from these famous schools?
Let's take for example popular Asian style studying. They might have lot of high scores, but use techniques of memorizing without understanding. Yes, lot of Asians do remember correct solutions to questions, but they lack understanding of actual problem and mechanism. They don't necessary even have time to learn all these things with huge amount of studies and it's much easier just to remember correct answers...
I've also met some people around the world from different schools. The biggest difference to here seemed to be that they had pretty good knowledge of one and only subject, but lacked understanding of anything outside their specialization, while some people had knowledge of much wider area while lacking on superb specializations to one area...
