Fascinating photographs of interracial marriage at a time it was banned in 16 states

How things have changed, now it seems odd if you marry someone the same colour or even sex!

The love story that changed history: Fascinating photographs of interracial marriage at a time when it was banned in 16 states


Just 45 years ago, 16 states deemed marriages between two people of different races illegal.

But in 1967, the U.S. Supreme Court considered the case of Richard Perry Loving, who was white, and his wife, Mildred Loving, of African American and Native American descent.

The case changed history - and was captured on film by LIFE photographer Grey Villet, whose black-and-white photographs are now set to go on display at the International Center of Photography.

article-2088040-0F80FD4400000578-797_634x429.jpg

Loving: Grey Villet's photograph captures Richard Loving kissing wife Mildred as he arrives home from work in King and Queen County, Virginia, April 1965

article-2088040-0F80FD3800000578-134_634x428.jpg

Content: The Loving's children Peggy, Sidney and Donald play in King and Queen County, Virginia in April 1965


Twenty images show the tenderness and family support enjoyed by Mildred and Richard and their three children, Peggy, Sidney and Donald.

The children, unaware of the struggles their parents face, are captured by Villet as blissfully happy as they play in the fields near their Virginia home or share secrets with their parents on the couch.

Their parents, caught sharing a kiss on their front porch, appear more worry-stricken.

And it is no wonder - eight years prior, the pair had married in the District of Columbia to evade the Racial Integrity Act of 1924, which banned any white person marrying any non-white person.

But when they returned to Virginia, police stormed into their room in the middle of the night and they were arrested.

The pair were found guilty of miscegenation in 1959 and were each sentenced to one year in prison, suspended for 25 years if they left Virginia.

article-2088040-0F80FD3C00000578-235_634x429.jpg

Tender: Mildred Loving greets husband Richard on their front porch in King and Queen County, Virginia, April 1965

article-2088040-0F80FD3000000578-782_634x424.jpg

Love: Grey Villet captures Richard and Mildred Loving with their children Peggy, Donald and Sidney in their living room in King and Queen County, Virginia, April 1965


They moved back to the District of Columbia, where they began the long legal battle to erase their criminal records - and justify their relationship.

Following vocal support from the Presbyterian and Roman Catholic churches, the Lovings won the fight - with the Supreme Court branding Virginia's anti-miscegenation law unconstitutional in 1967.

It wrote in its decision: 'Marriage is one of the basic civil rights of man, fundamental to our very existence and survival.

'To deny this fundamental freedom on so unsupportable a basis as the racial classifications embodied in these statutes, classifications so directly subversive of the principle of equality at the heart of the Fourteenth Amendment, is surely to deprive all the State's citizens of liberty without due process of law.'

article-2088040-0F80FD2800000578-392_634x424.jpg

A moment: Grey Villet captures Mildred and Richard Loving, their daughter Peggy, Mildred's sister Garnet and Richard's mother Lola, on the porch of Mildred's mother's house, Caroline County, Virginia in April 1965

article-2088040-0F80FD4800000578-428_634x419.jpg

Family: Richard and Mildred Loving sit in the open door of a car celebrating Richard's winning race, Sumerduck dragway in Sumerduck, Virginia, April 1965


Following the ruling, there was a 448 per cent increase in the number of interracial marriages in Georgia alone.

In 2007, 32 years after her husband died, Mrs Loving - who herself passed away the following year - released a statement in support of same-sex marriage.

She said: 'Not a day goes by that I don't think of Richard and our love, our right to marry, and how much it meant to me to have that freedom to marry the person precious to me, even if others thought he was the "wrong kind of person" for me to marry

'I believe all Americans, no matter their race, no matter their sex, no matter their sexual orientation, should have that same freedom to marry.

article-2088040-0F8140AB00000578-496_634x428.jpg

Concern: Mildred and Richard Loving in their home. They had been arrested in 1958, shortly after their marriage

article-2088040-0F81409400000578-383_634x456.jpg

Fears: In 1967, the US Supreme Court, in a unanimous verdict, ruled in the Loving's favor in 'Loving v. Virginia' and overturned Virginia's anti-miscegenation statute

article-2088040-0F81409000000578-890_306x423.jpg
article-2088040-0F81409800000578-484_306x423.jpg

Long fight: Left, Mildred and Richard Loving speak with their American Civil Liberties Union lawyer in May 1965. Pictured right, Mildred walks with her daughter near their home in Caroline County, Virginia the same year


'I am still not a political person, but I am proud that Richard's and my name is on a court case that can help reinforce the love, the commitment, the fairness, and the family that so many people, black or white, young or old, gay or straight seek in life. I support the freedom to marry for all. That's what Loving, and loving, are all about.'

Photographs of their content family life and grapple with the law were unearthed by director Nancy Buirski during the making of a documentary about the pair.

Her documentary, The Loving Story, will air on February 14 on HBO.

Twenty of the prints will be exhibited at the International Center of Photography in New York City, from January 20 until May 6. They are on loan by the estate of Grey Villet and by the Loving family.

article-2088040-0F81409C00000578-103_634x456.jpg

Together: Richard Loving and his son sit on a sofa in their home in Central Point, Caroline County, Virginia, May 196 - two years before the U.S Supreme court threw out the law banning interracial marriage

article-2088040-0F8140A400000578-499_634x476.jpg

Struggle: Mildred (center) and Richard Loving (left), with their daughter, on the front steps of the home of Richard Loving's mother (right) in Central Point, Caroline County, Virginia, May 1965


For more information about the exhibition, visit
http://www.icp.org/museum/exhibitions/loving-story-photographs-grey-villet


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...iage-time-banned-16-states.html#ixzz1jqfjExOZ
 
Re: Fascinating photographs of interracial marriage at a time it was banned in 16 sta

And about 20-30 years from now, people will look back on same-sex marriage in the same way
 
Re: Fascinating photographs of interracial marriage at a time it was banned in 16 sta

Slow and steady progress, a person should be allowed to love and live with whoever they may choose.

The goverment has no place in the bedrooms of America.
 

Deepcover

Closed Account
Re: Fascinating photographs of interracial marriage at a time it was banned in 16 sta

And about 20-30 years from now, people will look back on same-sex marriage in the same way

Interracial marriage and same sex marriage is two totally different things. Some people still feel uncomfortable about interracial marriage. The same goes for porn. If you don't believe me you should read some of the comments users post on a porn star doing IR scenes. It's unbelivable.
 

LukeEl

I am a failure to the Korean side of my family
Re: Fascinating photographs of interracial marriage at a time it was banned in 16 sta

I am the proud product of interacial marriage, so with those two pioneers in those pictures there, my parents would not have met in the U.S., got married, and had me as their son.
 
Re: Fascinating photographs of interracial marriage at a time it was banned in 16 sta

talk about a fucked up law.
 

StanScratch

My Penis Is Dancing!
Re: Fascinating photographs of interracial marriage at a time it was banned in 16 sta

Interracial marriage and same sex marriage is two totally different things. Some people still feel uncomfortable about interracial marriage. The same goes for porn. If you don't believe me you should read some of the comments users post on a porn star doing IR scenes. It's unbelivable.

So not totally different things.
Two people are in love. They want to be with each other for their version of eternity, to exchange vows and publicly declare that love in a church or court house. There is absolutely no reason why two consenting adults should not be allowed to get married. None.
Until our civilization pulls itself a little bit more out of the dark ages and destroys the thinking that ANY consenting marriage between two adults should be illegal, we will continue to be in the dark ages.
 

vodkazvictim

Why save the world, when you can rule it?
Re: Fascinating photographs of interracial marriage at a time it was banned in 16 sta

The races shouldn't mingle... Imagine rally tainted with F1. How ridiculous.
 

Rey C.

Racing is life... anything else is just waiting.
Re: Fascinating photographs of interracial marriage at a time it was banned in 16 sta

It's very interesting that this topic would be posted at this time. Tonight is the night of the GOP primary in South Carolina. Approximately twelve years ago, John McCain was in a heated, nasty primary battle with George W. Bush in South Carolina. And one of the hot topics was a smear campaign run by Bush operatives (some say it was Karl Rove leading the charge), implying that McCain's adopted daughter from Bangladesh was actually his illegitimate "nigra" daughter from an affair that McCain had with a Black woman years earlier. The fine people of South Carolina bought into this and other rumors about McCain, and he lost the South Carolina primary... setting Bush on the path to take the GOP nomination... win the Presidency in 2000... and go on to nearly destroy this once fine nation.

Clearly we've made progress over the years. But as the 2000 GOP South Carolina primary showed, not all of us have made that much progress. There's still a country club in my area that doesn't admit Blacks, Jews or women (they don't advertise that fact, but they don't). I have to wonder how many country clubs there are in South Carolina that wouldn't admit their Indian, female governor... unless she was admitted as the guest of a White, male member? :dunno:
 
Top