Ebert responds to Limbaugh's insinuation that Obama would steal $$$ donated to Haiti

Oh wow, I didn't know Roger Ebert had it in him to set idiots straight :glugglug:

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100114/OPINION/100119985

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcsi.dll/bilde?Site=EB&Date=20100114&Category=OPINION&ArtNo=100119985&Ref=AR&Maxw=438[/URL]
Rush Limbaugh blowing smoke.

A Letter to Rush Limbaugh

/ / / January 14, 2010

To: Rush Limbaugh
From: Roger Ebert

You should be horse-whipped for the insult you have paid to the highest office of our nation.

Having followed President Obama's suggestion and donated money to the Red Cross for relief in Haiti, I was offended to hear you suggest the President might be a thief capable of stealing money intended for the earthquake victims.

Here is a transcript from your program on Thursday:

Justin of Raleigh, North Carolina: "Why does Obama say if you want to donate some money, you could go to whitehouse.gov to direct you how to do so? If I wanted to donate to the Red Cross, why do I have to go to the White House page to donate?"

Limbaugh: "Exactly. Would you trust the money's gonna go to Haiti?"

Justin: "No."

Rush: "But would you trust that your name's gonna end up on a mailing list for the Obama people to start asking you for campaign donations for him and other causes?"

Justin: "Absolutely!"

Limbaugh: "Absolutely!"


That's what was said.

Unlike you and Justin of Raleigh, I went to Obama's web site, and discovered the link there leads directly to the Red Cross. I can think of a reason why anyone might want to go via the White House. That way they can be absolutely sure they're clicking on the Red Cross and not a fake site set up to exploit the tragedy.

But let me be sure I have this right. You and Justin agree that Obama might steal money intended for the Red Cross to help the wretched of Haiti.

This conversation came 48 hours after many of us had seen pitiful sights from Port au Prince. Tens of thousands are believed still alive beneath the rubble. You twisted their suffering into an opportunity to demean the character of the President of the United States.

This cannot have been an accident. A day earlier, in a sound bite from your show, you said "this will play right into Obama's hands. He's humanitarian, compassionate. They'll use this to burnish their, shall we say, 'credibility' with the black community -- in the both light-skinned and dark-skinned black community in this country. It's made-to-order for them."

Setting aside your riff on Harry Reid, consider what you imply. Obama will aid Haiti to please African-Americans. Haiti has lost untold thousands of lives. One third of the population has lost its homes. Countless people are still buried in the rubble. Every American president would act quickly to help our neighbor. You are so cynical and heartless as to explain Obama's action in a way that unpleasantly suggests how your mind works.

You have a sizable listening audience. You apparently know how to please them. Anybody given a $400 million contract must know what he is doing.

That's what offends me. You know exactly what you're doing.
 
Re: Ebert responds to Limbaugh's insinuation that Obama would steal $$$ donated to Ha

Newsflash: Limbaugh doesn't trust Obama.

Sue him.

Any critique you make of Conservative media types should be taken with a grain of salt considering the fact that you would like to have Larry Flynt's baby.
 
Re: Ebert responds to Limbaugh's insinuation that Obama would steal $$$ donated to Ha

Newsflash: Limbaugh doesn't trust Obama.

Sue him.

Any critique you make of Conservative media types should be taken with a grain of salt considering the fact that you would like to have Larry Flynt's baby.

Except for a few small details, Obama never insisted anyone had to go to the white house's site to donate. Further, it links to the red cross so Obama doesn't get a chance to touch the money in the first place in order to bear any burden of being trusted.

The problem isn't with Rush, Obama and trust. It's with Rush, his listener, the facts and common sense.

Again, Rush doesn't care about the facts as he could have easily dispelled the concerns of his misguided listener and related the reality to him. But instead, he willfully plays along using his ability to reach millions to perpetuate and amplify a myth.

And some people still think he's more than an entertainer..:confused:
 
Re: Ebert responds to Limbaugh's insinuation that Obama would steal $$$ donated to Ha

Except for a few small details, Obama never insisted anyone had to go to the white house's site to donate. Further, it links to the red cross so Obama doesn't get a chance to touch the money in the first place in order to bear any burden of being trusted.

The problem isn't with Rush, Obama and trust. It's with Rush, his listener, the facts and common sense.

Again, Rush doesn't care about the facts as he could have easily dispelled the concerns of his misguided listener and related the reality to him. But instead, he willfully plays along using his ability to reach millions to perpetuate and amplify a myth.

And some people still think he's more than an entertainer..:confused:


Maybe Obama should set up a donation drive on C-Span
 
Re: Ebert responds to Limbaugh's insinuation that Obama would steal $$$ donated to Ha

Maybe Obama should set up a donation drive on C-Span

I see the talking point doesn't fall far from the tree. But maybe he should.:glugglug:
 
Re: Ebert responds to Limbaugh's insinuation that Obama would steal $$$ donated to Ha

I see the talking point doesn't fall far from the tree. But maybe he should.:glugglug:



Didn't know that it had been suggested before.


:glugglug:
 

Ace Bandage

The one and only.
Re: Ebert responds to Limbaugh's insinuation that Obama would steal $$$ donated to Ha

I guess he's giving Rush "two thumbs down." Why don't you stick to movies, Roger? That seems more suited to your mental faculties...
 
Re: Ebert responds to Limbaugh's insinuation that Obama would steal $$$ donated to Ha

Newsflash: Limbaugh doesn't trust Obama.

Sue him.

Any critique you make of Conservative media types should be taken with a grain of salt considering the fact that you would like to have Larry Flynt's baby.

LMAO @ generic Conservatives who consider Limbaugh or even themselves genuine Conservatives :rofl:
 
Re: Ebert responds to Limbaugh's insinuation that Obama would steal $$$ donated to Ha

Why does anyone with a brain care about Rush Limbaugh? He's a pill-poppin' drug abusing loser who's schtick hasn't changed in 15 years. If you want to actually learn about an issue his show is the last place to go.

Maybe one day he will cross the line and the FCC will fine and suspend him permanently. Let the FCC do it's job and monitor his act. All that's left for him to do is to become an official FixedNews puppet :dunno:
 

Rey C.

Racing is life... anything else is just waiting.
Re: Ebert responds to Limbaugh's insinuation that Obama would steal $$$ donated to Ha

Why does anyone with a brain care about Rush Limbaugh? He's a pill-poppin' drug abusing loser who's schtick hasn't changed in 15 years. If you want to actually learn about an issue his show is the last place to go.

Actually it has changed in the past 15 years; he now seems to believe his own press. Years ago, he did have moments of reason and lucidity. Now, last time I listened in anyway, not so much. When he had a TV show, I used to watch him. I listed to his radio show daily, up through the mid 90's or so. Probably 20 years ago, when he debated Gloria Allred on a late night program, I though he made some excellent and well stated points. It was a very good debate, IMO. I'm not sure that he has the ability to do that any longer. His new schtick relies too much on hyperboles and exaggerations of the truth for me to see him as much more than the politico version of Howard Stern these days. Rush is just a political shock jock. He says whatever he has to in order to get attention. Like Sarah Palin, Michelle Malkin, Ann Coulter and Pat Robertson, he's just an attention whore. As long as he can keep people talking, his bank account expands (kinda like his waistline). But, it pays well, so who can blame him (or them)?

The really sad thing is that the GOP seems to be under his thumb these days. If they don't tow his party line, they have to publicly fasten their lips around his shriveled dick to make amends.
 
Top