ForumModeregulator
Believer In GregCentauro
I mean we pay 65$+ for a game...why should we be expected to throw more money at it for content that should have just been included to begin with? I love the concept of DLC, I just think it should be free.
Rockstar DLC is really the only DLC imo worth paying for, because its always an entire set of missions to go with it...but when it comes for paying for a couple of maps, which in time become free anyways, seems like a big scam that takes advantage of our gaming habits...
anyways hatred was sparked after realizing that the DLC maps for halo reach were already found on the disc in the game files (POSSIBLY)...that seems wrong.
I know the main argument is that nobody makes me buy it, or that its not necessary to pay to play, but it just seems like the majority of DLC are items and such that should be normal unlockables or achievements that SHOULD be included in the entire game when you pay for it to begin with. blah blah...
Rockstar DLC is really the only DLC imo worth paying for, because its always an entire set of missions to go with it...but when it comes for paying for a couple of maps, which in time become free anyways, seems like a big scam that takes advantage of our gaming habits...
anyways hatred was sparked after realizing that the DLC maps for halo reach were already found on the disc in the game files (POSSIBLY)...that seems wrong.
I know the main argument is that nobody makes me buy it, or that its not necessary to pay to play, but it just seems like the majority of DLC are items and such that should be normal unlockables or achievements that SHOULD be included in the entire game when you pay for it to begin with. blah blah...
