Sorry, having been educated in Not-America, my knowledge of the founding fathers doesn't go too far beyond what I learned in Hamilton.
That probably applies to most In-America learning as well. Those helpful Mike Huckabee and Rush Limbaugh books weren't around to teach the younger ones.
\\
Listening to the Q&A session yesterday, I was struck by this slip of the tongue from van der Veen responding to a question about 1A protections:
"ELECTED OFFICIALS HAVE A DIFFERENT, A
HIGHER STANDARD ON THE HOLDINGS THAT I GAVE YOU. THE
HIGHEST PROTECTIONS I SHOULD SAY. IT'S NOT A HIGHER STANDARD OF THE HIGHER PROTECTION TO YOUR SPEECH BECAUSE OF THE IMPORTANCE OF POLITICAL DIALOGUE BECAUSE OF WHAT YOU ALL SAY IN YOUR PUBLIC DEBATE ABOUT POLICY, ABOUT THE THINGS THAT AFFECT ALL OF OUR LIVES?"
He started by saying politicians have a higher standard for their speech, but quickly caught himself and noted they have higher protections (i.e., defenses). What an argument!